h*********7
发帖数: 1352 | 1 新华网北京9月6日电（记者吕诺）跌倒是我国65岁以上老年人伤害死亡的首位原因。发
现老年人跌倒时应该怎么办？卫生部6日公布的《老年人跌倒干预技术指南》提出：不
要急于扶起，要分情况进行处理。
指南提出，如老人意识不清，在场者应立即拨打急救电话。有外伤、出血，应立即止血
、包扎；有呕吐，应将其头部偏向一侧，并清理口、鼻腔呕吐物，保证呼吸通畅；有抽
搐，应移至平整软地面或身体下垫软物，防止碰、擦伤，必要时牙间垫较硬物，防止舌
咬伤，不要硬掰抽搐肢体，防止肌肉、骨骼损伤；如呼吸、心跳停止，应立即进行胸外
心脏按压、口对口人工呼吸等急救措施；如需搬动，应保证平稳，尽量平卧。
指南提出，如老人意识清楚，应询问老年人跌倒情况及对跌倒过程是否有记忆。如不能
记起，可能为晕厥或脑血管意外，应立即护送老年人到医院诊治或拨打急救电话；要询
问是否有剧烈头痛或口角歪斜、言语不利、手脚无力等提示脑卒中的情况，如有，立即
扶起老年人可能加重脑出血或脑缺血，使病情加重，应立即拨打急救电话；有外伤、出
血，应立即止血、包扎并护送老年人到医院进一步处理；查看有无提示骨折情形，如无
相关专业知识，不要随便搬动，以免加重病情，应立即拨打急救电话；查询有无腰、背
部疼痛及大小便失禁等提示腰椎损害情形，如无相关专业知识，不要随便搬动，以免加
重病情，应立即拨打急救电话；如老年人试图自行站起，可协助老人缓慢起立，坐、卧
休息并观察，确认无碍后方可离开；如需搬动，应保证平稳，尽量平卧休息；发生跌倒
均应在家庭成员或家庭保健员陪同下到医院诊治，查找跌倒危险因素，评估跌倒风险，
制定防止措施及方案。
《老年人跌倒干预技术指南》是卫生部疾病预防控制局组织编写的伤害干预系列技术指
南之一。同时发布的指南还有《儿童道路交通伤害干预技术指南》《儿童溺水干预技术
指南》《儿童跌倒干预技术指南》等。 | I*D
发帖数: 40035 | | m**********n
发帖数: 27535 | 3 这是医学常识，你懂个屁
【在 I*D 的大作中提到】
: 真是中国特色，这都要政府来规定
| b*******8
发帖数: 37364 | 4 谁叫110就是谁的责任，不心虚理亏你干嘛打电话？ | I*D
发帖数: 40035 | 5 我是不懂，不象你，不但懂屁，连屎都懂
【在 m**********n 的大作中提到】
: 这是医学常识，你懂个屁
| x********v
发帖数: 2535 | 6 这不是中国特色。很多国家都有。我还上过紧急救助课程呢，专门就是讲碰到有人受伤
紧急情况下应该怎么办。
其中碰到骑摩托车的人摔倒受伤是最难办的事情。因为他可能骨折了，你随便移动，也
许就再也接不回来，落下终身残疾。更麻烦的是他带的头盔，弄不好脖子断了，窒息一下子就救不回来了。所以这时候不能动他，而是等待紧急救护人员来处理。他们因为更有经验，而且有设备，且知道移动时候该怎么固定受伤部位，不容易出事情。如果很明显他头颈没有受伤，才可以两个人共同帮他把头盔取下来，让他呼吸顺畅一些。
【在 I*D 的大作中提到】
: 真是中国特色，这都要政府来规定
| e**o
发帖数: 6038 | 7 这个也不是什么规定啊
基本医学知识的普及而已
【在 I*D 的大作中提到】
: 真是中国特色，这都要政府来规定
| T******y
发帖数: 14506 | | L*********d
发帖数: 7037 | 9 加州最高法院发来贺电
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/24/opinion/ed-goodsam24
Blocking good Samaritans
State lawmakers should come to the rescue after justices restrict what
people can do to help in a crisis.
December 24, 2008
At a time of year when people are inclined to help those in need, the
California Supreme Court has given some of them reason for pause. By
narrowing the so-called good-Samaritan law that has long protected
bystanders who step forward in an emergency, a recent court ruling could
scare off would-be do-gooders by confusing them about what help they can
offer without fearing a lawsuit.
Every state -- and almost every industrialized nation -- has some version of
the law that shields amateur rescuers from liability. In California, the
Health and Safety Code extends that protection to everyone "who in good
faith, and not for compensation, renders emergency care at the scene of an
emergency."
The ruling last week involved a paraplegic woman who claims that her
disability was caused by a co-worker who pulled her from a car following an
accident. The two had been partying with friends when the vehicle in which
Alexandra Van Horn was a passenger crashed. Co-worker Lisa Torti, who was in
another car, removed Van Horn from the wreck. Usually, emergency procedures
call for not moving someone who might have suffered a spinal injury unless
absolutely necessary. Van Horn says she was yanked out roughly by the arm;
Torti claims she had to get Van Horn out of the car quickly because she saw
signs that it was about to catch fire, though others say they saw no such
signs.
Torti contended that she was protected from liability as a volunteer rescuer
, but the court majority interpreted the law to cover only bystanders who
provide emergency medical care, not rescue. That's because California's good
-Samaritan law is part of a broad code section governing all kinds of
emergency services, and it refers frequently to "medical" care. Yet as the
court minority pointed out, the good-Samaritan portion of the code refers
only to "emergency care," and the very fact that it doesn't specify medical
care implies that it means all sorts of care.
We don't foresee people acting as cavalierly as the characters in "Seinfeld,
" who in the series finale stood around cracking jokes about a crime victim
instead of trying to help him, but the damage could be considerable. Not
only might the ruling stop bystanders from pulling someone to safety from,
say, the edge of a cliff -- what if the yank dislocates a shoulder? -- but
it could stop them from giving the medical aid that is protected. Let's see,
if someone is drowning in the ocean, might we get in trouble for pulling
them out of the waves, or for performing CPR? If we don't do the former, we
certainly won't need to bother with the latter, and when in doubt, more of
us will tend to do nothing at all. Public knowledge of the good-Samaritan
law is vague enough without people having to recall which acts of attempted
heroism are covered and which aren't.
Torti may have made a terrible error. Amateurs often make mistakes under
pressure -- occasionally, they make damaging or fatal mistakes. But on the
whole, society is safer when we watch out for each other. In order to
preserve the spirit of selfless acts that can save lives, the Legislature
must expand the law so that it protects all well-intentioned amateur
rescuers.
【在 I*D 的大作中提到】
: 真是中国特色，这都要政府来规定
|
|
