n******h
发帖数: 2544 | 1 看了他的网站觉得很多理念很好很make sense，具体到买基金的策略上，他提倡买
index，而且充分diversify。
股票型的也就算了，如果看bond，total bond的回报过去很多年一直远远低于PIMCO，
这个怎么解释呢？ | w***n
发帖数: 1519 | 2 It's not that difficult to understand: There are always outstanding someone
who can beat index, be it stock index or bond index.
Boglehead's approach is for ordinary people. If you are extremely good and
you know what you are doing, why would you want to buy index fund and
diversify?
【在 n******h 的大作中提到】
: 看了他的网站觉得很多理念很好很make sense，具体到买基金的策略上，他提倡买
: index，而且充分diversify。
: 股票型的也就算了，如果看bond，total bond的回报过去很多年一直远远低于PIMCO，
: 这个怎么解释呢？
| w***n
发帖数: 1519 | 3
Or, in Peter Lynch's word, "diworsify"
【在 w***n 的大作中提到】
: It's not that difficult to understand: There are always outstanding someone
: who can beat index, be it stock index or bond index.
: Boglehead's approach is for ordinary people. If you are extremely good and
: you know what you are doing, why would you want to buy index fund and
: diversify?
| S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 4 On equity side, especially US large caps, Cap-weighted indexing has sound
footing, Other than that, not so much, especially in bond, small caps, and
in places where it is not so transparent and you need local knowledge such
as Asia.
【在 n******h 的大作中提到】
: 看了他的网站觉得很多理念很好很make sense，具体到买基金的策略上，他提倡买
: index，而且充分diversify。
: 股票型的也就算了，如果看bond，total bond的回报过去很多年一直远远低于PIMCO，
: 这个怎么解释呢？
|
|
