j*******l
发帖数: 419 | 1 公司律师发来的其中一个supporting evidence是review这每问题，但是后面那段解释
让我有点迷糊，是不是现在只用邀请信和感谢信作为审稿证明已经不够了？感谢各位解
答。
Evidence of your participation as the judge of the work of others in the
same or an allied academic field.
"Please note that peer review is routine in the field and usually has
limited value in demonstrating your international recognition as outstanding
. Please provide documentation of the criteria for selection as a judge,
panelist, reviewer, etc. Please also provide documentary evidence to
establish how your participation is uncommon or otherwise noteworthy
relative to others who participate in similar activities." | q*******2
发帖数: 454 | 2 意思是要editor的证明信，但是如果其他背景够强，是完全没必要的 | P*********I
发帖数: 174 | 3 请editor出个信函，信中需要出现他选你做reviewer的理由。例如：outstanding
researcher, international acclaims等关键字眼。这样比较有利于说明你做review不
是routine work是因为你的杰出成就 |
|
