a******e
发帖数: 271 | 1 USCIS 今天PO出了一些新的准则，其中有一条和EB-1B有关，有大神可以看得懂的吗？
求教。谢谢！
Employers petitioning for EB-1 outstanding professors and researchers may
now submit initial evidence comparable to the other forms of evidence
already listed in 8 CFR 204.5(i)(3)(i), much like certain employment-based
immigrant categories that already allow for submission of comparable
evidence.
链接：
http://www.uscis.gov/news/dhs-enhances-opportunities-h-1b1-e-3- |
L**i
发帖数: 22365 | |
g**8
发帖数: 7 | 3 求解释
【在 a******e 的大作中提到】
: USCIS 今天PO出了一些新的准则，其中有一条和EB-1B有关，有大神可以看得懂的吗？
: 求教。谢谢！
: Employers petitioning for EB-1 outstanding professors and researchers may
: now submit initial evidence comparable to the other forms of evidence
: already listed in 8 CFR 204.5(i)(3)(i), much like certain employment-based
: immigrant categories that already allow for submission of comparable
: evidence.
: 链接：
: http://www.uscis.gov/news/dhs-enhances-opportunities-h-1b1-e-3-
|
h***a
发帖数: 1775 | |
J*******o
发帖数: 31 | 5 同样关注。看了一下关于这次的原始文件。
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/01/15/2016-00478/enhancing-
opportunities-for-h-1b1-cw-1-and-e-3-nonimmigrants-and-eb-1-immigrants
说是EB-1 allow "comparable" evidences。感觉这意思是条件有所放宽。（尼玛，看
英文法律文件太肯爹了，请高手来指点一下迷津）。
【在 h***a 的大作中提到】
: 是那个允许专利和funding作为证据吗？
|
L**i
发帖数: 22365 | 6 感觉是放宽了，属于对不上那几个category的也可以claim |
