a******e 发帖数: 271 | 1 USCIS 今天PO出了一些新的准则,其中有一条和EB-1B有关,有大神可以看得懂的吗?
求教。谢谢!
Employers petitioning for EB-1 outstanding professors and researchers may
now submit initial evidence comparable to the other forms of evidence
already listed in 8 CFR 204.5(i)(3)(i), much like certain employment-based
immigrant categories that already allow for submission of comparable
evidence.
链接:
http://www.uscis.gov/news/dhs-enhances-opportunities-h-1b1-e-3- |
L**i 发帖数: 22365 | |
g**8 发帖数: 7 | 3 求解释
【在 a******e 的大作中提到】 : USCIS 今天PO出了一些新的准则,其中有一条和EB-1B有关,有大神可以看得懂的吗? : 求教。谢谢! : Employers petitioning for EB-1 outstanding professors and researchers may : now submit initial evidence comparable to the other forms of evidence : already listed in 8 CFR 204.5(i)(3)(i), much like certain employment-based : immigrant categories that already allow for submission of comparable : evidence. : 链接: : http://www.uscis.gov/news/dhs-enhances-opportunities-h-1b1-e-3-
|
h***a 发帖数: 1775 | |
J*******o 发帖数: 31 | 5 同样关注。看了一下关于这次的原始文件。
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/01/15/2016-00478/enhancing-
opportunities-for-h-1b1-cw-1-and-e-3-nonimmigrants-and-eb-1-immigrants
说是EB-1 allow "comparable" evidences。感觉这意思是条件有所放宽。(尼玛,看
英文法律文件太肯爹了,请高手来指点一下迷津)。
【在 h***a 的大作中提到】 : 是那个允许专利和funding作为证据吗?
|
L**i 发帖数: 22365 | 6 感觉是放宽了,属于对不上那几个category的也可以claim |