t******f
发帖数: 349 | 1 本来修改了的eb1a PL，结果律师这么说了，心颤...
1) Description of the journals in which you have been published is unlikely
to be considered significant, especially as relevant journal statistics have
already been included (i.e. impact factor, ranking, etc.)
2) We strongly prefer to use SCImago, Google Scholar Metrics, and impact
factor statistics over Eigenfactor scores
3) The USCIS is unlikely to consider impact factors below 4 as significant.
4) Providing the journal information for papers which have cited your work
is unlikely to be considered significant and will likely not strengthen your
case. We should instead focus on your own publications.
5) It is unnecessary to list and describe the citations to your works, and
is unlikely to strengthen your case. |
f***h
发帖数: 283 | 2 这种驴屎除了会拖后腿，别的不会。
就拿（3）来说，有的领域连最好的杂志也没有4分。
相信你自己。1，4，5 都是挖掘亮点的途径。自己有时间的话，还不如摆脱这种驴屎，
自己 DIY. |
c*******n
发帖数: 82 | 3 楼主可以把这个律师开了啊，还不如找大蜜啊，钱少而且更专业 |
p********r
发帖数: 3243 | 4 那个词是俺发明的,老兄。呵呵
撸主，你何苦去招惹驴屎呢？！ |
p******8
发帖数: 516 | 5 DIY...
【在 f***h 的大作中提到】
: 这种驴屎除了会拖后腿，别的不会。
: 就拿（3）来说，有的领域连最好的杂志也没有4分。
: 相信你自己。1，4，5 都是挖掘亮点的途径。自己有时间的话，还不如摆脱这种驴屎，
: 自己 DIY.
|
m******p
发帖数: 5393 | 6 不是你NIW的把材料寄丢的律师吧
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/33379001.html
unlikely
have
your
【在 t******f 的大作中提到】
: 本来修改了的eb1a PL，结果律师这么说了，心颤...
: 1) Description of the journals in which you have been published is unlikely
: to be considered significant, especially as relevant journal statistics have
: already been included (i.e. impact factor, ranking, etc.)
: 2) We strongly prefer to use SCImago, Google Scholar Metrics, and impact
: factor statistics over Eigenfactor scores
: 3) The USCIS is unlikely to consider impact factors below 4 as significant.
: 4) Providing the journal information for papers which have cited your work
: is unlikely to be considered significant and will likely not strengthen your
: case. We should instead focus on your own publications.
|
s******y
发帖数: 17729 | 7 3) The USCIS is unlikely to consider impact factors below 4 as significant.
绝对是胡说霸道
有点行业顶级杂志（领域top10）也就三两分
unlikely
have
your
【在 t******f 的大作中提到】
: 本来修改了的eb1a PL，结果律师这么说了，心颤...
: 1) Description of the journals in which you have been published is unlikely
: to be considered significant, especially as relevant journal statistics have
: already been included (i.e. impact factor, ranking, etc.)
: 2) We strongly prefer to use SCImago, Google Scholar Metrics, and impact
: factor statistics over Eigenfactor scores
: 3) The USCIS is unlikely to consider impact factors below 4 as significant.
: 4) Providing the journal information for papers which have cited your work
: is unlikely to be considered significant and will likely not strengthen your
: case. We should instead focus on your own publications.
|
t******f
发帖数: 349 | 8 I want to break up the contract with the stupid attorney. But how?
How about #2? |
K*****1
发帖数: 56 | 9 这个律师还不如DIY，大家自然是哪里有亮点就用哪个数据库，而且impact factor和专
业关系太大了。
unlikely
have
your
【在 t******f 的大作中提到】
: 本来修改了的eb1a PL，结果律师这么说了，心颤...
: 1) Description of the journals in which you have been published is unlikely
: to be considered significant, especially as relevant journal statistics have
: already been included (i.e. impact factor, ranking, etc.)
: 2) We strongly prefer to use SCImago, Google Scholar Metrics, and impact
: factor statistics over Eigenfactor scores
: 3) The USCIS is unlikely to consider impact factors below 4 as significant.
: 4) Providing the journal information for papers which have cited your work
: is unlikely to be considered significant and will likely not strengthen your
: case. We should instead focus on your own publications.
|
t******f
发帖数: 349 | 10 If I break up with attorney right now, I guess I still need to pay 1K to her
since the contract says it will calculate the charge by hour. |
|
|
s********c
发帖数: 2313 | 11 楼主的这个律师。。。
挖亮点是王道！
同楼上问，不会是你的NIW的律师吧。。。 |
p********r
发帖数: 3243 | |
s******y
发帖数: 17729 | 13 被坑了吧，刚开始看你在版面搞推荐信的时候，就跟你说小心软文托儿。多扫版面帖子
，从垃圾中挑出好货。
【在 t******f 的大作中提到】
: I want to break up the contract with the stupid attorney. But how?
: How about #2?
|
c********3
发帖数: 4531 | 14 自身条件牛逼的话，听律师的也没问题，反正都是躺过 |
A**********n
发帖数: 824 | 15 这个律师很专业地希望楼主进一步修改,并且指导了如何修改，不知有什么错。律师的
修改建议让楼主心颤，该骂还是该赞？律师说楼主躺着也能过，楼主不心颤而心花怒放
，等移民官让楼主心颤时就晚喽。
1）指出了问题,2）指导了如何解决1）的问题。
3）是律师的观点。他/她有多个案子的经验（这里的人的经验都不大于一个案子），没
有理由不相信他/她，楼主花钱买的就是他/她的这些知识和经验。
4）即指出了问题,又指导了如何解决问题。
5）那是律师的专业指导。楼主花钱买的就是他/她的这些知识和经验。
逢提律师就"不如DIY"似乎也缺乏足够的数据样本基础。例如，的确有些专业（例如，
化工）的TOP期刊（哪些人承认“TOP”这个词很重要）也就2，3IF。但是，不代表移民
官就承认这些期刊是TOP期刊，如何解释（吹捧）这些专业的期刊的“TOP"是个难题，
有一点是肯定的：不能用IF来吹。本人不才：找名人或其它依据设法证明“公认为TOP
”---的确很难，把自己包装成“领域内少数顶尖”本身就不是容易的事，因为自己根
本就不是“领域内少数顶尖”。向律师请教，花钱就是让他/她解决这类难题的。如果
他/她不能提供实质指导，那这个律师的水平或责任心就有问题了。
unlikely
have
your
【在 t******f 的大作中提到】
: 本来修改了的eb1a PL，结果律师这么说了，心颤...
: 1) Description of the journals in which you have been published is unlikely
: to be considered significant, especially as relevant journal statistics have
: already been included (i.e. impact factor, ranking, etc.)
: 2) We strongly prefer to use SCImago, Google Scholar Metrics, and impact
: factor statistics over Eigenfactor scores
: 3) The USCIS is unlikely to consider impact factors below 4 as significant.
: 4) Providing the journal information for papers which have cited your work
: is unlikely to be considered significant and will likely not strengthen your
: case. We should instead focus on your own publications.
|
b**********3
发帖数: 342 | 16 楼主提到的5样律师不建议用的， 我全用了， diy, PP, 直接通过。 |
A**********n
发帖数: 824 | 17 对这些问题,个案有时很难成为决策依据.例如,本ID个人没有用这些东西,直接通过,已
绿.楼主现在得到的信息是:用可以通过,不用也可以通过.有何意义? 具体案例具体分析
,例如,假设用<4的IF来说明期刊,那个期刊可能刚好是移民官认可的TOP,也可能相反.
【在 b**********3 的大作中提到】
: 楼主提到的5样律师不建议用的， 我全用了， diy, PP, 直接通过。
|
b****t
发帖数: 21 | 18 这其实都只是机率问题 律所的律师看过的案件比较多
会给这些建议可能只是这些点都是有可能被特定几个移民官issue RFE，
可能只是建议lz不要采用以免被RFE的机率而已。就算使用也是有直接通过的机率。
因为其实移民官的标准也是看移民官心情而异，但如果是律所送的case被RFE
现在板上的认知就是觉得很该死一定会上来抱怨一番。
大律所跟小律所看过的案件经验差异是很大的，就算小律所认真的律师跟不认真的律师
差异也是很大，
板上自从经历加州收钱不办事律师和敲诈风波後对律师普遍就是仇视的态度，
其实一般找律师也是为了省时间如果不相信律师DIY就好了，这麽苦逼昨啥呢。 |
j*******0
发帖数: 232 | 19 1k is nothing. I paid much more than that when I terminates my contract with
the 1st attorney. You will realize it is worthy!
her
【在 t******f 的大作中提到】
: If I break up with attorney right now, I guess I still need to pay 1K to her
: since the contract says it will calculate the charge by hour.
|
