d********e
发帖数: 81 | 1 我的I140申请仍在pending，近期将和领导回国几周，我返签H1B，她的F1签证仍有效。
一起回美国过海关的时候，会因为我申请了I140有移民倾向，导致她不能持F1入境吗？
如果不会影响入境，顺利的话可能回美国后不久I140会有结果，如果批了会马上交485,
带上LD一起。这种情况（F1入境后不久即递交485)对485结果有影响吗？谢谢各位。如
果有风险的话，可能得取消TRIP。。。 | z**********8
发帖数: 766 | 2 你的140还没有批，你LD的F1应该不会受影响；入关时分在两个道装不认识就行
交485没问题 | g****e
发帖数: 1829 | 3 为啥装不认识呢？他的140和他ld有啥关系？
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 你的140还没有批，你LD的F1应该不会受影响；入关时分在两个道装不认识就行
: 交485没问题
| d*******n
发帖数: 4778 | 4 F1签证还在有效期内，F1入境和你申请140没关系，和她的F1身份是否有效有关，她在
离境之前，要到International center去在I-20上签字，如有封在读证明就更好了。
回美国后的任何时候都可以递交485，不会有影响。
485,
【在 d********e 的大作中提到】
: 我的I140申请仍在pending，近期将和领导回国几周，我返签H1B，她的F1签证仍有效。
: 一起回美国过海关的时候，会因为我申请了I140有移民倾向，导致她不能持F1入境吗？
: 如果不会影响入境，顺利的话可能回美国后不久I140会有结果，如果批了会马上交485,
: 带上LD一起。这种情况（F1入境后不久即递交485)对485结果有影响吗？谢谢各位。如
: 果有风险的话，可能得取消TRIP。。。
| c**2
发帖数: 8496 | 5 her F1入境后不久即提交485的情况 is not a problem, because she is not
considered as F1入境后不久即提交485 in this case. it is just a short
vacation and she comes back to continue her study. | d********e
发帖数: 81 | 6 GOOGLE了一下，说是最好入境2-3个月之后再交485，否则可能有欺诈嫌疑，因为F1入境
的时候得没有移民倾向，如果马上就交身份调整可能说不过去....过海关的时候也貌似
需要分开走...
不知道实际情况应该如何？
http://ipv6.weiming.info/zhuti/EB23/31320003/ | d********e
发帖数: 81 | 7 找了另外一段 请大家帮忙看看。
原帖如下，在倒数第3段。说是F1入境2个月之后交485会保险一点，否则有被怀疑fraud
的可能
http://www.immihelp.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-42802.html
There is no absolute answer to your question since USCIS does not have any
specific guidelines on when the issue of fraud can arise in such cases.
However, DOS has developed a fraud rule that they apply at United States
consulates. While DOS guidance is not necessarily binding on USCIS, it
carries some weight and USCIS officers tend to follow it. So let's start
with that.
Here are the relevant notes from 9 FAM §40.63 of the Foreign Affairs Manual
("FAM"):
N4.7-2--Within 30-Days (TL:VISA-313; 08-27-2001)
If an alien violates his or her nonimmigrant status by adjusting status or
by seeking unauthorized employment within 30 days of entry, the consular
officer may presume that the applicant misrepresented his or her intention
in seeking a visa or entry.
N4.7-3--After 30 days But Within 60 (TL:VISA-313; 08-27-2001)
If an alien initiates such violation of status more than 30 days but less
than 60 days after entry into the United States, no presumption of
misrepresentation arises. However, if the facts in the case give the
consular officer reasonable belief that the alien misrepresented his or her
intent, then the consular officer must give the alien the opportunity to
present countervailing evidence. If the officer does not find such evidence
to be persuasive, then the consular officer must submit a comprehensive
report to the Department (CA/VO/L/A) for the rendering of an advisory
opinion.
N4.7-4--After 60 Days (TL:VISA-313; 08-27-2001)
When violative conduct occurs more than 60 days after entry into the United
States, the Department does not consider such conduct to constitute a basis
for an INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) ineligibility.
To summarize, the 30/60 fraud rule says that if you seek adjustment of
status within 30 days of your entry, you will be presumed to have committed
fraud and must provide evidence to rebut this presumption. If you seek
adjustment after 30 days but within 60 days of your entry, there is no
presumption but they can still accuse you of fraud. If you seek adjustment
after 60 days, it would not be an issue.
So if the USCIS adopts a similar rule, my advice to you is to wait at least
60 days after your entry before you file your application for adjustment of
status. There should be nothing wrong with gathering documentation in
advance as long as you do not file the actual paperwork until at least 60
days have passed. If you really have to file before 60 days have passed (I
don't recommend it), at the very least, I would wait until 30 days have
passed. At least this will avoid the presumption of fraud.
I should also mention that adjustment of status is considered a privilege,
not a right. It can still be denied if USCIS determines that negative
factors exist, including preconceived intent to be an immigrant at the time
of entry as a nonimmigrant. So if USCIS believes that you had preconceived
intent to be an immigrant at the time of entry, even if you did not actually
commit fraud, they can still deny your adjustment of status application as
a matter of discretion.
Fortunately, as a result of Matter of Cavazos, 17 I. & N. Dec. 215 (BIA 1980
) immediate relatives are exempted from this potential problem. According to
Matter of Cavazos, in the absence of other adverse factors, an application
for adjustment of status as an immediate relative should generally be
granted in the exercise of discretion notwithstanding the fact that the
applicant entered the United States as a nonimmigrant with a preconceived
intention to remain. So in your situation, your adjustment of status
application should not be denied on the basis of preconceived intent. """ |
|
