w********w
发帖数: 221 | 1 感恩節求祝福過 （http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32663669.html）。聖誕節前收到RFE。claim了老三樣。RFE承認了authorship和judgement，否決了contribution。本人從事biomedical領域。
在信中，IO XM100首先簡單羅列了我提交的證據：You have submitted several
letters of support；Your work has been independently citied 87 times； Your
work has been published in notable journals； One of your articles was an
editor's choice.；You have made first time discoveries. 接著他承認了“you
have made first time discoveries and your work has been recognized;
therefore, you have conducted original research. USCIS also recognizes your
research abilities。” 然後，他認為“the totality of your work has not risen
to a major significance within your field. ”以下是他的理由：
1. Given your publication rate, and citation record it has not been
established your work has made a major significant impact within your field.
2. It is notable you have published your work in notable journals;
however, this alone does not establish your work has made a major
significant impact.
3. USCIS understands your citation record is higher than the average
citation rate, but it must be noted you are comparing your citation to the
average in the field, which does establish your work has made a major
significant impact.
4. USCIS recognizes your work has been helpful and has contributed to
future research; however the record falls short in establishing your work
has made a major significant impact within the field.
最後XM100提出需要
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution
to the field；
2. Evidence of your work being implemented by others， such as contracts，
licensed technology， patients.
實際上，在original petition中，我提交了新聞媒體對我的研究的報導，並且得到很
多著名媒體的轉載；提交了2個生物公司應用我的研究的證據（實際這些研究就是和這2
家公司合作的）；提交了evidences showing my citation ranks top 5% in my field
（Web of Science的排列組合大法）；提交了一些深入討論我的研究的文章。這些
XM100都沒有提及。是不是可以重新打印組織一下提交。
請大家給些建議。多謝！ |
w********w
发帖数: 221 | 2 結合USCIS RFE 模板（http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Outreach/Draft%20Request%20for%20Evidence%20(RFE)%20Template%20for%20Comment/i_140_E11_alien_extraordinary_ability_rfe.pdf），我發現了USCIS針對contribution的模板：
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are
original and of major significance, you may submit:
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary
’s contribution to the field.
2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary’s work important.
3. Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s contributions of major significance.
4. Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited
.
5. Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others.
Possible evidence may include but is not limited to:
o Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
o Licensed technology being used by others;
o Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
6. The above are examples of evidence you may submit to support your
petition and are not all inclusive. You may submit any other relevant
evidence which demonstrates you meet the criterion.
XM100實際上是根據1，5，6點來問我的。是不是他已承認了2，3，4？ |
s*********u
发帖数: 2535 | 3 感觉是模板ＲＦＥ，好好准备应该问题不大。
这个是老调子了，再要推荐信吧。你的引用和生物领域相比偏低，这个是硬伤，就不要
再谈了。
重点谈谈你的文章的影响，新的推荐信里面一定一定要具体，具体到到底是怎么影响他
们的工作的。我看过一些推荐信模板，感觉真的很空，一味说多牛很牛，具体到底怎么
影响他们自己的工作的事实却没有。个人感觉这个是关键。
ＢＬＥＳＳ |
w********w
发帖数: 221 | 4 感恩節求祝福過 （http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32663669.html）。聖誕節前收到RFE。claim了老三樣。RFE承認了authorship和judgement，否決了contribution。本人從事biomedical領域。
在信中，IO XM100首先簡單羅列了我提交的證據：You have submitted several
letters of support；Your work has been independently citied 87 times； Your
work has been published in notable journals； One of your articles was an
editor's choice.；You have made first time discoveries. 接著他承認了“you
have made first time discoveries and your work has been recognized;
therefore, you have conducted original research. USCIS also recognizes your
research abilities。” 然後，他認為“the totality of your work has not risen
to a major significance within your field. ”以下是他的理由：
1. Given your publication rate, and citation record it has not been
established your work has made a major significant impact within your field.
2. It is notable you have published your work in notable journals;
however, this alone does not establish your work has made a major
significant impact.
3. USCIS understands your citation record is higher than the average
citation rate, but it must be noted you are comparing your citation to the
average in the field, which does establish your work has made a major
significant impact.
4. USCIS recognizes your work has been helpful and has contributed to
future research; however the record falls short in establishing your work
has made a major significant impact within the field.
最後XM100提出需要
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution
to the field；
2. Evidence of your work being implemented by others， such as contracts，
licensed technology， patients.
實際上，在original petition中，我提交了新聞媒體對我的研究的報導，並且得到很
多著名媒體的轉載；提交了2個生物公司應用我的研究的證據（實際這些研究就是和這2
家公司合作的）；提交了evidences showing my citation ranks top 5% in my field
（Web of Science的排列組合大法）；提交了一些深入討論我的研究的文章。這些
XM100都沒有提及。是不是可以重新打印組織一下提交。
請大家給些建議。多謝！ |
w********w
发帖数: 221 | 5 結合USCIS RFE 模板（http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Outreach/Draft%20Request%20for%20Evidence%20(RFE)%20Template%20for%20Comment/i_140_E11_alien_extraordinary_ability_rfe.pdf），我發現了USCIS針對contribution的模板：
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are
original and of major significance, you may submit:
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary
’s contribution to the field.
2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary’s work important.
3. Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s contributions of major significance.
4. Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited
.
5. Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others.
Possible evidence may include but is not limited to:
o Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
o Licensed technology being used by others;
o Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
6. The above are examples of evidence you may submit to support your
petition and are not all inclusive. You may submit any other relevant
evidence which demonstrates you meet the criterion.
XM100實際上是根據1，5，6點來問我的。是不是他已承認了2，3，4？ |
s*********u
发帖数: 2535 | 6 感觉是模板ＲＦＥ，好好准备应该问题不大。
这个是老调子了，再要推荐信吧。你的引用和生物领域相比偏低，这个是硬伤，就不要
再谈了。
重点谈谈你的文章的影响，新的推荐信里面一定一定要具体，具体到到底是怎么影响他
们的工作的。我看过一些推荐信模板，感觉真的很空，一味说多牛很牛，具体到底怎么
影响他们自己的工作的事实却没有。个人感觉这个是关键。
ＢＬＥＳＳ |
P***Y
发帖数: 236 | |
t*******c
发帖数: 117 | 8 我认为你可以把你提到的那些材料重新组织提交，再补充一些能挖掘到的新材料。
你背景根据应该没问题。
bless |
l**n
发帖数: 908 | 9 你这个case跟我的太像了
连87个独立引用，一篇editors' choice这么刁钻的数据都一样。
我也是contribution 和 totality被RFE。
你可以参考一下我的回复——当然，我也是参考别人的。最重要的一点就是按照他的模
板走。比如说contribution就按那5个方面来安排证据。具体如何安排你可以参考一下
我是怎么把证据给放进去的。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Immigration/32783499_3.html
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Immigration/32783613_3.html
不用太担心，顺着IO脾气来，你的case还是很不错的。关键是把东西组织好，合了IO的
口味就行。
好运！
Your
your
risen
【在 w********w 的大作中提到】
: 感恩節求祝福過 （http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32663669.html）。聖誕節前收到RFE。claim了老三樣。RFE承認了authorship和judgement，否決了contribution。本人從事biomedical領域。
: 在信中，IO XM100首先簡單羅列了我提交的證據：You have submitted several
: letters of support；Your work has been independently citied 87 times； Your
: work has been published in notable journals； One of your articles was an
: editor's choice.；You have made first time discoveries. 接著他承認了“you
: have made first time discoveries and your work has been recognized;
: therefore, you have conducted original research. USCIS also recognizes your
: research abilities。” 然後，他認為“the totality of your work has not risen
: to a major significance within your field. ”以下是他的理由：
: 1. Given your publication rate, and citation record it has not been
|
w********w
发帖数: 221 | |
l**n
发帖数: 908 | 11 呵呵，没看到发文的日子
同喜同喜
【在 w********w 的大作中提到】
: 謝謝ICAN.我的CASE也過了！
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32784133.html
|
