x3
发帖数: 616 | 1 被RFE,承认authorship和review,不承认original contribution
补了很多材料证明orignial contribution
律师想再帮我加个critical role，但是比较犹豫，因为这个role没有问题，但是
organization不distinguish，排名大概七八十的学校，律师说我的学校有过先例，移
民官不承认我们学校distinguish，现在问题是：如果claim这一条正面影响和负面影响
有多大，要不要claim,多谢了 | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 2 Here's just my 2 cents, please do talk more with your lawyer.
Original contribution is almost equivalent to totality, so it doesn't matter
much whether you add one more claim or not, since you need to prove your
original contribution anyway.
To prove that, you can emphasize that your role is critical, together with
many other evidences, without explicitly claiming it.
【在 x3 的大作中提到】
: 被RFE,承认authorship和review,不承认original contribution
: 补了很多材料证明orignial contribution
: 律师想再帮我加个critical role，但是比较犹豫，因为这个role没有问题，但是
: organization不distinguish，排名大概七八十的学校，律师说我的学校有过先例，移
: 民官不承认我们学校distinguish，现在问题是：如果claim这一条正面影响和负面影响
: 有多大，要不要claim,多谢了
| b*********r
发帖数: 7139 | 3 thx for the input and welcome back:)
matter
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: Here's just my 2 cents, please do talk more with your lawyer.
: Original contribution is almost equivalent to totality, so it doesn't matter
: much whether you add one more claim or not, since you need to prove your
: original contribution anyway.
: To prove that, you can emphasize that your role is critical, together with
: many other evidences, without explicitly claiming it.
|
|
