z****a
发帖数: 372 | 1 背景:
Journal paper: 8 (7 english, 1 chinese)
conference proceeding paper: 3 (english)
Citation: 60 (ISI and CNKI, independent citation: ~30) WEAK
Provisional patent: 3
Presentation: 10
Review：〉30 for >10 journals
RL: 10 (2 dependent, 3 for patent (2 from companies showing interest, 1 from
univ IP office indicating agreement signed), 2 for review,1 citing paper, 2
for presentation and paper)
Claim: authorship, contribution, judge.
authorship and judge通过，质疑contribution and totality.大家帮我看看，前面的
部分貌似是模板，所有contribution的条例都有，最后又好像强调impact on
scientific community...
IO是不是要的就是最后的关于citation,editor / editorial position 证明？RFE只提
供这些还是再把contribution部分重新提交一遍？
谢谢 | m**********l
发帖数: 28 | | d*******n
发帖数: 1339 | 3 你没有提供文章和引用的证据吗？也没有提供审稿的证据？
很奇怪哦
from
2
【在 z****a 的大作中提到】
: 背景:
: Journal paper: 8 (7 english, 1 chinese)
: conference proceeding paper: 3 (english)
: Citation: 60 (ISI and CNKI, independent citation: ~30) WEAK
: Provisional patent: 3
: Presentation: 10
: Review：〉30 for >10 journals
: RL: 10 (2 dependent, 3 for patent (2 from companies showing interest, 1 from
: univ IP office indicating agreement signed), 2 for review,1 citing paper, 2
: for presentation and paper)
| z****a
发帖数: 372 | 4 这些证据都提供了，文章都打印了，引用打印的ISI.审稿提供了editor邀请和感谢信
【在 d*******n 的大作中提到】
: 你没有提供文章和引用的证据吗？也没有提供审稿的证据？
: 很奇怪哦
:
: from
: 2
| z****a
发帖数: 372 | 5 没有PP
【在 m**********l 的大作中提到】
: 请问楼主专业和是否直接pp？
: 谢谢
: bless
| d******g
发帖数: 988 | 6 Yeah, this does seem strange, looks like you didn't provide the articles and
all the evidence.
Anyway, treat the RFE as filing it again, so give them all you have.
And how many citations are for the Chinese paper, and how many are for the 7
English papers? Try to look for some long citation in review articles, and
put them in the front to impress the IO. If your paper just published in
2011 or 2012, you may have the references stating that for new paper, this
citation is not low at all. Or, have the reference stating that you are
doing pioneer work, so low citation is normal.
List the journals of your publication, show that they are the top-ranked
journals in your field.
They also talked about the internationally outstanding. So spread your
references out, and maybe listing all the institute that cited you, or
contacted you for paper/code/results. | t****a
发帖数: 439 | | z****a
发帖数: 372 | 8 Thanks for your good suggestions!
and
7
and
【在 d******g 的大作中提到】
: Yeah, this does seem strange, looks like you didn't provide the articles and
: all the evidence.
: Anyway, treat the RFE as filing it again, so give them all you have.
: And how many citations are for the Chinese paper, and how many are for the 7
: English papers? Try to look for some long citation in review articles, and
: put them in the front to impress the IO. If your paper just published in
: 2011 or 2012, you may have the references stating that for new paper, this
: citation is not low at all. Or, have the reference stating that you are
: doing pioneer work, so low citation is normal.
: List the journals of your publication, show that they are the top-ranked
| l*******s
发帖数: 437 | | e****e
发帖数: 158 | 10 既然怀疑totality，我觉得RFE时每项都得提供更细更好的证据。再找人谢谢推荐信，
最新的引用再好好整整，有更多的审稿也加上。 | z****a
发帖数: 372 | | z****a
发帖数: 372 | 12 我仔细看了一下RFE，IO承认我提交了evidence of the beneficiary's citation
record...
A review of the record does not establish that ...
1. please submit a complete record of the scholarly books or articles...
2. updated results from scholarly literature search websites to show
beneficiary's citation record excluding cites by the beneficiary, coauthors
and research group
3. evidence provided shows the beneficiary has acted as a judge of the work
of others in their academic field..however, 就是说这个不能证明国际影响力，可
以交editorial position, large number review, reviewer for membership/prizes
etc
我的问题：
1。这个情况是不是要求补独立引用，还是这个只是要求补引用的模板话，引用低如果
在交独立的可能就更不好看了
2。这种情况是不是还应该补editor的信证明reviewer要有国际影响力，我原来有一封
，又找到了一封，还有一个editor也答应写，但是因为现在找独立推荐人关于
contribution很难，考虑要不要把这个editor作为独立推荐谈我在他杂志上发表文章的
重要性？
还有就是原来的信重点强调一下改改找原来的人重新签名可以么？找推荐人太难了
and
7
and
【在 d******g 的大作中提到】
: Yeah, this does seem strange, looks like you didn't provide the articles and
: all the evidence.
: Anyway, treat the RFE as filing it again, so give them all you have.
: And how many citations are for the Chinese paper, and how many are for the 7
: English papers? Try to look for some long citation in review articles, and
: put them in the front to impress the IO. If your paper just published in
: 2011 or 2012, you may have the references stating that for new paper, this
: citation is not low at all. Or, have the reference stating that you are
: doing pioneer work, so low citation is normal.
: List the journals of your publication, show that they are the top-ranked
|
|
