b********u
发帖数: 890 | 1 给杂志写了证明信的draft， 有句话提到了5%, 但是不是很吃的准5%够不够好去支持
EB1A， 是不是非要1%什么的？ 大侠们给看看，多谢啦。
His excellence made him among the top 5% of the reviewers of the journal who
received constant review invitations due to the worldwide recognition of
talented polymer research. |
b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 2 这句话吧，要是IO真的读，那你的问题就来了。
top 5% reviewers? 啥评价标准？ 审稿数量？ 发文数量？ 给人一种放卫星的感觉。
用数字说话是要有具体实例的。
who
【在 b********u 的大作中提到】
: 给杂志写了证明信的draft， 有句话提到了5%, 但是不是很吃的准5%够不够好去支持
: EB1A， 是不是非要1%什么的？ 大侠们给看看，多谢啦。
: His excellence made him among the top 5% of the reviewers of the journal who
: received constant review invitations due to the worldwide recognition of
: talented polymer research.
|
b********u
发帖数: 890 | 3 我也是担心画蛇添足， 多谢回复，我再看看怎么说合适。 |
l********g
发帖数: 656 | 4 top 10 即可
who
【在 b********u 的大作中提到】
: 给杂志写了证明信的draft， 有句话提到了5%, 但是不是很吃的准5%够不够好去支持
: EB1A， 是不是非要1%什么的？ 大侠们给看看，多谢啦。
: His excellence made him among the top 5% of the reviewers of the journal who
: received constant review invitations due to the worldwide recognition of
: talented polymer research.
|
