K******g
发帖数: 1870 | 1 公司律师说我刚毕业不久（1年半），必须证明我读phd期间三年的research经验。所以
就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里，特地在第
一段话中突出我的outstanding contributions 是“during his graduate study at
University of xxx." 请问这样子好吗？我总感觉这样子会weaken这个testimonial的
作用
另外一个就是在正文中提到我的paper的时候，还特别强调了”In his study, Dr. xx
and his PhD research supervisor, Dr. xxx, developed ...". 我觉得这样子就更加
weaken我的case了。
不管怎样，我还是会follow律师的意见，但是我很想知道其他有经验的人的看法。多谢
了。 | f*****e
发帖数: 1889 | 2 我觉得你的律师说的很有道理啊.
你要证明你有三年的工作经验. 如果你要算上GA的经验的话,你要证明你在读书其间的
研究也是OUTSTANDING的, 并且你还拿到了你的DEGREE.
更恰当的做法是单独写个SECTION说明有三年的工作经验. | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 3 Your lawyer's right, you need to include your Ph.D. experience as your
outstanding research experience.
The first sentence seems fine.
In the second sentence, it's specified that you and your advisor did the
work, and it sounds a bit unnecessary. You can just say that "Dr. xx's
research in yyy has influenced zzz", and it can be mentioned elsewhere that
the research in yyy is your Ph.D. work, but the fact that this work was done
during your Ph.D. needs not to be specified clearly everywhere.
以就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里，特地在
第一段话中突出我的outstanding contributions 是“during his graduate study at
University of xxx." 请问这样子好吗？我总感觉这样子会weaken这个testimonial的
作用
xx and his PhD research supervisor, Dr. xxx, developed ...". 我觉得这样子就
更加weaken我的case了。
谢了。
【在 K******g 的大作中提到】
: 公司律师说我刚毕业不久（1年半），必须证明我读phd期间三年的research经验。所以
: 就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里，特地在第
: 一段话中突出我的outstanding contributions 是“during his graduate study at
: University of xxx." 请问这样子好吗？我总感觉这样子会weaken这个testimonial的
: 作用
: 另外一个就是在正文中提到我的paper的时候，还特别强调了”In his study, Dr. xx
: and his PhD research supervisor, Dr. xxx, developed ...". 我觉得这样子就更加
: weaken我的case了。
: 不管怎样，我还是会follow律师的意见，但是我很想知道其他有经验的人的看法。多谢
: 了。
| c****e
发帖数: 311 | 4 我也觉得你律师的建议有道理。虽然第二个说法可以改进下。但是目的还是挺对的。我
当时没强调PhD的工作，也没用之前老板的推荐信。就被RFE了三年研究经历。后来要了
PhD老板的推荐信来证明了下。
xx
【在 K******g 的大作中提到】
: 公司律师说我刚毕业不久（1年半），必须证明我读phd期间三年的research经验。所以
: 就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里，特地在第
: 一段话中突出我的outstanding contributions 是“during his graduate study at
: University of xxx." 请问这样子好吗？我总感觉这样子会weaken这个testimonial的
: 作用
: 另外一个就是在正文中提到我的paper的时候，还特别强调了”In his study, Dr. xx
: and his PhD research supervisor, Dr. xxx, developed ...". 我觉得这样子就更加
: weaken我的case了。
: 不管怎样，我还是会follow律师的意见，但是我很想知道其他有经验的人的看法。多谢
: 了。
| e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 5 完全同意，尤其第二条
that
done
at
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: Your lawyer's right, you need to include your Ph.D. experience as your
: outstanding research experience.
: The first sentence seems fine.
: In the second sentence, it's specified that you and your advisor did the
: work, and it sounds a bit unnecessary. You can just say that "Dr. xx's
: research in yyy has influenced zzz", and it can be mentioned elsewhere that
: the research in yyy is your Ph.D. work, but the fact that this work was done
: during your Ph.D. needs not to be specified clearly everywhere.
:
: 以就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里，特地在
| K******g
发帖数: 1870 | 6 不会觉得把我的advisor带上会觉得weaken我的case吗？尤其是那篇文章是我的advisor
的第一作者，我是第二作者。
【在 e******r 的大作中提到】
: 完全同意，尤其第二条
:
: that
: done
: at
| K******g
发帖数: 1870 | 7 那是一篇文章，老板是第一作者我是第二作者，但是我觉得提到我老板会很大的weaken
我的case。
that
done
at
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: Your lawyer's right, you need to include your Ph.D. experience as your
: outstanding research experience.
: The first sentence seems fine.
: In the second sentence, it's specified that you and your advisor did the
: work, and it sounds a bit unnecessary. You can just say that "Dr. xx's
: research in yyy has influenced zzz", and it can be mentioned elsewhere that
: the research in yyy is your Ph.D. work, but the fact that this work was done
: during your Ph.D. needs not to be specified clearly everywhere.
:
: 以就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里，特地在
| T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 8 二作 is good to use, and you don't need to specify this all the time. Just
say your paper xxx or your work in yyy has this or that usage.
"我觉得提到我老板会很大的weaken我的case" yes, if this is mentioned
everywhere, it didn't sound good to me. But you should still mention your
research experience during Ph.D. in ONE or TWO places, as you do need to
show that you have at least 3 years of OUTSTANDING research experience. And
then use "Dr. KingMing's work" in other places.
weaken我的case。
【在 K******g 的大作中提到】
: 那是一篇文章，老板是第一作者我是第二作者，但是我觉得提到我老板会很大的weaken
: 我的case。
:
: that
: done
: at
|
|
