x*******0
发帖数: 2439 | 1 问题见下:
The record reflects that you actually reviewed one article from XXX. …It
can not be concluded that reviewing one manuscript and judging an
internal competition does not confer extraordinary ability in science
upon you or that you are one of the very few who have risen to the top
of your field.
Reviewing manuscripts is recognized as a professional obligation of
researchers who published themselves in scientific journals. We can not
conclude that you peer review of one manuscript submitted to XXX is
commensurate with sustained national or international acclaim, or being
among that small percentage at the very top of the field of endeavor.
background 见下:
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/31915261.html
I-140 递交后帮业内5 journals review 了约 20多篇,其中3 journals 引用量业内
top
3 review 约20. 另2journals 共3篇.
现在准备了editor letters from 3 journals. 准备强调journals 业内 top .
短时间 review 很多. 最担心就是这些都是 PD 后的.
大家有啥建议, 谢谢!!! | n*****y
发帖数: 198 | | x*******0
发帖数: 2439 | | x*******0
发帖数: 2439 | | u**c
发帖数: 60 | 5 1. editor's reference letter is important. It is not enough if the letter
only verifies your experience as reviewer. 更重要的是要吹杂志本身， 吹你的
ACHIEVEMENT， 和你对杂志的贡献.
2. Journal's background. eg. IF, H factor, etc
【在 x*******0 的大作中提到】
: 问题见下:
: The record reflects that you actually reviewed one article from XXX. …It
: can not be concluded that reviewing one manuscript and judging an
: internal competition does not confer extraordinary ability in science
: upon you or that you are one of the very few who have risen to the top
: of your field.
: Reviewing manuscripts is recognized as a professional obligation of
: researchers who published themselves in scientific journals. We can not
: conclude that you peer review of one manuscript submitted to XXX is
: commensurate with sustained national or international acclaim, or being
|
|
