j**u
发帖数: 6059 | 1 The petitioner states that it is the national interest to waive the labor
certification requirement. The petitioner must persuasively demonstrate that
the national interest would be adversely affected if a labor certification
was required. The petitioner must establish that the beneficiary’s skills
or background are unique and innovative and serve the national interest.
后一个好说，自己unique的background。前一个关于labor certification的，该如何
回复这个RFE呢？多谢多谢。 | K**o
发帖数: 906 | 2 1: evidence that u r serving national interest greater than peers
2: LC process will prevent u from making huge contribution using ur superb
skill because blablabla | j**u
发帖数: 6059 | 3 多谢。我就是不知道最后那个blablabla具体该怎么阐述。
【在 K**o 的大作中提到】
: 1: evidence that u r serving national interest greater than peers
: 2: LC process will prevent u from making huge contribution using ur superb
: skill because blablabla
| K**o
发帖数: 906 | 4 首先狂举证,你比peer牛很多,贡献更多;
其次,如果lc,因为visa原因不能involve 某些合作, 参与你最牛的项目等;然后
national interest就狂损失了.
【在 j**u 的大作中提到】
: 多谢。我就是不知道最后那个blablabla具体该怎么阐述。
| j**u
发帖数: 6059 | 5 有道理，多谢。包子请查收。
【在 K**o 的大作中提到】
: 首先狂举证,你比peer牛很多,贡献更多;
: 其次,如果lc,因为visa原因不能involve 某些合作, 参与你最牛的项目等;然后
: national interest就狂损失了.
|
|
