f*******r
发帖数: 5301 | 1 这枪什么枪口装置都没有 难道不就是锯一段的区别吗 | h*********2
发帖数: 2508 | 2 应该是轻管和重管的区别。还有就是FNH有时有军剩就便宜价格批发给零售商，所以会
有某一批突然便宜不少，纯粹是因为进货价格的区别，这是FNH客服的解释。 | f*******r
发帖数: 5301 | 3 16和20都是轻管
20轻管很容易买到九百多的 到处都是
【在 h*********2 的大作中提到】
: 应该是轻管和重管的区别。还有就是FNH有时有军剩就便宜价格批发给零售商，所以会
: 有某一批突然便宜不少，纯粹是因为进货价格的区别，这是FNH客服的解释。
| h*********2
发帖数: 2508 | 4 那就是进货价导致的了，FNH这么解释的，说东西完全没区别，就是contract over-run
优惠给了零售商
【在 f*******r 的大作中提到】
: 16和20都是轻管
: 20轻管很容易买到九百多的 到处都是
| f*******r
发帖数: 5301 | 5 好吧
FNAR还是栓动 我现在很纠结
run
【在 h*********2 的大作中提到】
: 那就是进货价导致的了，FNH这么解释的，说东西完全没区别，就是contract over-run
: 优惠给了零售商
| h*********2
发帖数: 2508 | 6 要是为了SHTF当然是FNAR, 火力+精度+可靠（短程活塞）
下面是个用户在FN论坛对这只枪的评价：
As a designated marksman rifle (DMR), the FNAR is darn near perfect for
police, law enforcement (LE), SWAT and other similar non-battlefield uses.
I disagree that the DM role is limited only to needing a "med/high power
scope", as you comment. However, you may want that kind of scope, at least
for the first shot fired, for a sniper-like role. The accuracy of the rifle
certainly supports it. But these same LE and SWAT teams have real snipers
with dedicated sniper rifles for real sniper shots, if that's all that they
need. No, the FNAR is meant for more than that. A sniper shot is only really
the answer when a single, well-placed shot will stop a bad situation cold.
By contrast, situations have been happening more and more in which a single,
well-placed shot won't solve the problem. There is a famous video of a real
-life two-man bank hold-up gone bad in Southern California (attack? the word
"hold-up" is way too mild). The police were completely out-gunned by two
guys with high-powered rifles wearing body armor. Six or eight policemen
were killed or severely wounded in the firefight. The police had to barge
into a local hunting store and "requisition" a number of .30-06 hunting
rifles to finally bring the two guys down. This was a one-of-a-kind
situation, but there are many other cases of heavily armed gangs resisting
police, drug/human smuggler "private armies" operating down on the Mex
border, etc. In these cases, there are two or more, often many more, heavily
armed, extremely dangerous individuals who have been trapped or provoked
into a desperate, to-the-death firefight. Killing one of the gang is not
enough. Any one of them could cause numerous fatalities. THAT is what the
FNAR is meant to deal with.
In a gang shoot-out, all hell is going to break loose. The DMR operators (
preferrably two or more) might be placed at some stand-off distance (25-75
yards) to support a peaceful arrest, a drug bust involving unknown numbers
of bad guys, a forcible building entry, a crowd/street dispersal, a tear gas
flush-out or other precipitating tactic to end a stand off or end an
unacceptable situation. While it is absolute doctrine of all LE agencies to
avoid gunfire, for public safety reasons, IF the bad guys start shooting,
they are probably going to be moving, running, trying to escape, trying to
engage innocent bystanders for distraction, using get-away vehicles, etc. A
"situation" gone bad, a chaotic shootout with multiple moving assailants is
where a sniper will do no good and a DM operator(s) may save the day. The DM
operator and DMR need to be capable of rapid target acquisition and rapid,
repeat aimed fire upon moving targets. When fitted with 1X to low/mid-power,
wide field-of-view optics, there is none better than the FNAR to be the DMR
. I would call this rapid, repeat, moving fire scenario "dynamic". So
instead of a DM role, it would be a DDM role.
In my vision of the DDMR role for the FNAR (admittedly, a worst case role
from a LE point of view, but damn good to be able to perform, if the case
arises), the fact that with mid/high-power optics the FNAR can be accurate
at 300-600 yards is totally incidental and beside the point. The things that
(incidentally) make it accurate at these ranges were put there for other
reasons. The .308Win cartridge (at 63,000 psi chamber pressure, a magnum
cartridge) was chosen NOT to be a sniper round at 800 yards with a 2 foot
drop but to blow through light cover (drywall), body armor, windshields and
non-armored vehicles at much shorter range (where is LE ever going to have
300-600 yards to play with in a city, or even a small town?). The heavy,
flutted barrel was NOT put there so that your consistency at 500 yards was
better but rather so that under rapid repeat fire at much closer distances
you don't have to think about barrel heating AT ALL. The heavy mass of the
FNAR and the recoil-reducing semi-auto action was NOT put there so a sniper
might, if he was lucky, get off a second shot before he needed to scoot but
rather so that an LE officer could get off 20 shots in 30 seconds, all of
them aimed, accurate, and deadly fire.
So this is the rifle you bought. This is the FNAR, as FN intended it to be.
It is a police rifle for the police version of SHTF, worst case. Thank God
you were able to obtain it!
【在 f*******r 的大作中提到】
: 好吧
: FNAR还是栓动 我现在很纠结
:
: run
| f*******r
发帖数: 5301 | 7 你这是在忽悠heavy barrel吧。。。
rifle
they
really
【在 h*********2 的大作中提到】
: 要是为了SHTF当然是FNAR, 火力+精度+可靠（短程活塞）
: 下面是个用户在FN论坛对这只枪的评价：
: As a designated marksman rifle (DMR), the FNAR is darn near perfect for
: police, law enforcement (LE), SWAT and other similar non-battlefield uses.
: I disagree that the DM role is limited only to needing a "med/high power
: scope", as you comment. However, you may want that kind of scope, at least
: for the first shot fired, for a sniper-like role. The accuracy of the rifle
: certainly supports it. But these same LE and SWAT teams have real snipers
: with dedicated sniper rifles for real sniper shots, if that's all that they
: need. No, the FNAR is meant for more than that. A sniper shot is only really
| h*********2
发帖数: 2508 | 8 看帖子枪主评价的应该是HB版本，
‘The heavy,flutted barrel was NOT put there so that your consistency at 500
yards was better but rather so that under rapid repeat fire at much closer
distances you don't have to think about barrel heating AT ALL. ’
【在 f*******r 的大作中提到】
: 你这是在忽悠heavy barrel吧。。。
:
: rifle
: they
: really
|
|
