由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Football版 - 技术问题:catch or no catch
相关主题
Applicable rules to the play are as follows:为什么我认为呆子那个球应该是catch
刚才茶几的最后一个TDit's 4th down pass, much better knocking the ball away
那个球最后一伸如果过线了,应该怎么判[合集] 钢人最后那个为什么算没控制球?
问个规则Pats own Steelers
Re: rules on puntfair catch?
SF有个TD是接球的飞身跃过底线并出线,为什么算?If this TD is not reversed, I'll be speechless
呆子太牛了菜鸟问一个技术问题
呆子就是妖孽。。。这个catch如何?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: catch话题: ball话题: control话题: inbounds话题: enough
进入Football版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
G**Y
发帖数: 33224
1
为啥今年突然这么多争议球
s*****o
发帖数: 22187
2
呆子去年把这个rule顶到新高潮

【在 G**Y 的大作中提到】
: 为啥今年突然这么多争议球
b**l
发帖数: 33123
3
解说都搞不清楚,我们就更别提了

【在 G**Y 的大作中提到】
: 为啥今年突然这么多争议球
N*****m
发帖数: 42603
4
去年,哦不,威震天那年就有了

【在 G**Y 的大作中提到】
: 为啥今年突然这么多争议球
L**F
发帖数: 615
5
这个问题连专家也搞不清楚,现有规则下裁判主观影响太大。呆子那事以后NFL重写了
规则:
“A player who makes a catch may advance the ball. A forward pass is
complete (by the offense) or intercepted (by the defense) if a player, who
is inbounds: a) secures control of the ball in his hands or arms prior to
the ball touching the ground; and b) touches the ground inbounds with both
feet or with any part of his body other than his hands; and c) maintains
control of the ball long enough, after (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, to
enable him to perform any act common to the game (i.e., maintaining control
long enough to pitch it, pass it, advance with it, or avoid or ward off an
opponent, etc.).”
看看,什么叫“maintaining control long enough”? 这就是搞笑, 裁判觉得多长
时间是就是了。
1 (共1页)
进入Football版参与讨论
相关主题
这个catch如何?Re: rules on punt
Must maintain possession going to the groundSF有个TD是接球的飞身跃过底线并出线,为什么算?
这个reverse其实和呆子那个reverse相互矛盾了呆子太牛了
昨天贝克汉姆那个不算的踢地呆子就是妖孽。。。
Applicable rules to the play are as follows:为什么我认为呆子那个球应该是catch
刚才茶几的最后一个TDit's 4th down pass, much better knocking the ball away
那个球最后一伸如果过线了,应该怎么判[合集] 钢人最后那个为什么算没控制球?
问个规则Pats own Steelers
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: catch话题: ball话题: control话题: inbounds话题: enough