由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Faculty版 - NIH这个21点policy九月开始实施
相关主题
NCI, R21, 13分, 希望大吗NIH R01 percentile
Re: NIH R01: put up for consideration for fundingR01 grant
2014 年度R01 的 paylineNIH JIT
NIH R21 scoregrant proposal 分数下来了
NIH fisical yearRO1
NIH的PO回信要Leaders Committee meeting决定PO通知R01被批准后多久才能受到正式通知?
有申请NCI(NIH)R21的?这个NIH R21有戏吗?
nih R01什么时候能收到确认的通知NIH怎么又砍funding 了?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: nih话题: policy话题: councils话题: exceptions话题: pi
进入Faculty版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
b*****d
发帖数: 61690
1
Exception要director office来批。而且一定要增加资助的PI总数。
This isn’t the first time that NIH has taken aim at what some call "fat
cats.” A policy in place since 2012 requires that institute advisory
councils give extra scrutiny to grant applications from researchers who
already have more than $1 million in direct research funding. But the policy
allows for exceptions and “has not had much impact,” Lauer says. He says
it’s different this time because the NIH director’s office will weigh in
on any exceptions to the 21-point rule, and the policy has clear objectives
to raise the number of funded investigators.
NIH plans to discuss the policy with its advisory councils in the coming
weeks, with an eye toward implementing it for grant applications starting in
September.
D**s
发帖数: 6361
2
扩大资助pi面积,缩小每个pi的资助规模…
要是最后弄成funding也搞AA就毁了…

policy
says
objectives

【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: Exception要director office来批。而且一定要增加资助的PI总数。
: This isn’t the first time that NIH has taken aim at what some call "fat
: cats.” A policy in place since 2012 requires that institute advisory
: councils give extra scrutiny to grant applications from researchers who
: already have more than $1 million in direct research funding. But the policy
: allows for exceptions and “has not had much impact,” Lauer says. He says
: it’s different this time because the NIH director’s office will weigh in
: on any exceptions to the 21-point rule, and the policy has clear objectives
: to raise the number of funded investigators.
: NIH plans to discuss the policy with its advisory councils in the coming

l***s
发帖数: 841
3
目前寡头集中度太高,需要平衡照顾一下劳苦人民。周围见过太多30分以上的PI花钱如
流水,也见过不少0分的但很有才智的PI关了门。这个问题在NCI尤其严重。

【在 D**s 的大作中提到】
: 扩大资助pi面积,缩小每个pi的资助规模…
: 要是最后弄成funding也搞AA就毁了…
:
: policy
: says
: objectives

y********1
发帖数: 13
4
看来还是可以超过21点。那6%的可以继续拿5个R01,因为他们都属于“exceptions“
D**s
发帖数: 6361
5
其实恰恰相反,现在这个阶段,出于国家之间研究领域的竞争,需要高度集中化研究…
研究成本越来越高,不集中资源就无法取得突破性进展…搞小作坊才是无法解决目前的
问题…

【在 l***s 的大作中提到】
: 目前寡头集中度太高,需要平衡照顾一下劳苦人民。周围见过太多30分以上的PI花钱如
: 流水,也见过不少0分的但很有才智的PI关了门。这个问题在NCI尤其严重。

1 (共1页)
进入Faculty版参与讨论
相关主题
NIH怎么又砍funding 了?NIH fisical year
NIH big data U01, R01 and NCI U01?NIH的PO回信要Leaders Committee meeting决定
可以给NCI R21作为PI同一时间投两个proposal不?有申请NCI(NIH)R21的?
NIH又挂了nih R01什么时候能收到确认的通知
NCI, R21, 13分, 希望大吗NIH R01 percentile
Re: NIH R01: put up for consideration for fundingR01 grant
2014 年度R01 的 paylineNIH JIT
NIH R21 scoregrant proposal 分数下来了
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: nih话题: policy话题: councils话题: exceptions话题: pi