d*****n
发帖数: 3084 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Apple 讨论区 】
发信人: danjuan (Keep your feet on the ground.), 信区: Apple
标 题: 外接硬盘跟SAN/NAS之类的有什么区别
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Feb 11 10:27:20 2013, 美东)
小office需要，想用MAC Mini做文件服务器，然后加External Thunderbolt Storage，
看起来速度很快，这个跟SAN/NAS之类的东西有什么区别？看起来也可以用RAID，速度
也极快啊。
这样如果可行的话，那么操作系统能否在外接硬盘上搜索文件呢？就像google卖的搜索
服务器一样。 | d*****n
发帖数: 3084 | 2 这么低级的问题，但不是家用的。望各位大拿用我们老百姓的语言解释一下。看起来，
果子版其实应该弄到shopping类去。 | a**********k
发帖数: 1953 | 3 SAN provides storage at Block level (via Ethernet,
Fiber-Channel etc.) while NAS is at File level via
NFS/CIFS over IP stack).
The storage solution you mentioned looks like directly
attached via PCIe or SAS. In that case, the storage device
is neither SAN nor NAS for the server because it's
directly attached. But if you use a MAC Mini as file
server, then this MAC will be a NAS for its clients,
if there's any.
Hope it helps.
【在 d*****n 的大作中提到】
: 这么低级的问题，但不是家用的。望各位大拿用我们老百姓的语言解释一下。看起来，
: 果子版其实应该弄到shopping类去。
| d*****n
发帖数: 3084 | 4 Thanks. ...there should be ANY:)
【在 a**********k 的大作中提到】
: SAN provides storage at Block level (via Ethernet,
: Fiber-Channel etc.) while NAS is at File level via
: NFS/CIFS over IP stack).
: The storage solution you mentioned looks like directly
: attached via PCIe or SAS. In that case, the storage device
: is neither SAN nor NAS for the server because it's
: directly attached. But if you use a MAC Mini as file
: server, then this MAC will be a NAS for its clients,
: if there's any.
: Hope it helps.
|
|
