w********i
发帖数: 1721 | 1 http://www.immigration-law.com/
11/20/2015: USCIS Submits on 11/19/2015 Proposed Rule for Employment-Based
Immigration Modernization, aka Approved I-140 EAD/Portability |
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 2 哈哈，你加breaking news了。我来顶你。 大家快点集中力量准备comments吧
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: http://www.immigration-law.com/
: 11/20/2015: USCIS Submits on 11/19/2015 Proposed Rule for Employment-Based
: Immigration Modernization, aka Approved I-140 EAD/Portability
|
w********i
发帖数: 1721 | |
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 4 细节没出，不出也好，免得反移民的提前准备。
昨天参加dhs的会，感觉内容还是非常利好的！！！
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 不知道细节是啥.
|
w********i
发帖数: 1721 | 5 DHS proposes to allow certain approved Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker
(Form I-140) beneficiaries to obtain work authorization
看样子有ead阿 |
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 6 昨天会上提了，不过版上有些人居心拨测，心里不平衡，你懂的。我们还是集中正能量
，不要让有些人没事找事吧。 负能量多了，能帮忙的同胞都望而却步了。现在需要的
是团结和正能量。
Worker
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: DHS proposes to allow certain approved Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker
: (Form I-140) beneficiaries to obtain work authorization
: 看样子有ead阿
|
z******y
发帖数: 969 | 7 应该是一定年限后给EAD。140 批准后一年。 这一点就够了。 |
w********i
发帖数: 1721 | 8 View Rule
View EO 12866 Meetings Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in
XML
DHS/USCIS RIN: 1615-AC05 Publication ID: Fall 2015
Title: Retention of EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 Immigrant Workers and Program
Improvements Affecting Highly-Skilled H-1B Alien Workers
Abstract:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is proposing to amend its
regulations affecting certain employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant
classifications. This rule proposes to amend current regulations to provide
stability and job flexibility for the beneficiaries of approved employment-
based immigrant visa petitions while they wait to become lawful permanent
residents. DHS is also proposing to conform its regulations with the
American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 (AC21) as
amended by the Twenty-First Century Department of Justice Appropriations
Authorization Act (the 21st Century DOJ Appropriations Act), as well as the
American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (ACWIA). The
rule also seeks to clarify several interpretive questions raised by ACWIA
and AC21 regarding H-1B petitions, and incorporate relevant AC21 policy
memoranda and an Administrative Appeals Office precedent decision, and would
ensure that DHS practice is consistent with them.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security(DHS) Priority: Other Significant
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda Agenda Stage of
Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Stage
Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 8 CFR 204 to 205 8 U.S.C. 214 8 CFR 245 8 CFR 274a
(To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations.)
Legal Authority: 6 U.S.C. 112 8 U.S.C. 1154 and 1155 8 U.S.C. 1184
8 U.S.C. 1255 8 U.S.C. 1324a
Legal Deadline: None
Statement of Need:
This rule provides needed stability and flexibility to certain employment-
based immigrants while they wait to become lawful permanent residents. These
amendments would support U.S. employers by better enabling them to hire and
retain highly skilled and other foreign workers. DHS proposes to accomplish
this, in part, by implementing certain provisions of ACWIA and AC21, as
amended by the 21st Century DOJ Appropriations Act. The 21st Century DOJ
Appropriations Authorization Act, which will impact certain foreign
nationals seeking permanent residency in the United States, as well as H-1B
workers. Further, by clarifying interpretive questions related to these
provisions, this rulemaking would ensure that DHS practice is consistent
with statute.
Summary of the Legal Basis:
The authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary) for these
regulatory amendments can be found in section 102 of the Homeland Security
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 112, and section
103(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), which
authorize the Secretary to administer and enforce the immigration and
nationality laws. In pertinent part, ACWIA authorized the Secretary to
impose a fee on certain H-1B petitioners which would be used to train
American workers, and AC21 provides authority to increase access to foreign
workers as well as to train U.S. workers. In addition, section 274A(h)(3)(B)
of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1324a(h)(3)(B), recognizes the Secretary’s authority
to extend employment to noncitizens in the United States, and section 205 of
the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1155, recognizes the Secretary’s authority to exercise
discretion in determining the revocability of any petition approved by him
under section 204 of the INA.
Alternatives:
The alternative would be to continue under current procedures without change.
Anticipated Costs and Benefits:
The proposed amendments would increase the incentive of highly-skilled and
other foreign workers who have begun the immigration process to remain in
and contribute to the U.S. economy as they complete the process to adjust
status to or otherwise acquire lawful permanent resident status, thereby
minimizing disruptions to petitioning U.S. employers. Attracting and
retaining highly-skilled persons is important when considering the
contributions of these individuals to the U.S. economy, including advances
in entrepreneurial and research and development endeavors, which are highly
correlated with overall economic growth and job creation.
Risks:
Timetable:
Action Date FR Cite
NPRM 12/00/2015
Additional Information: 1615-AB97 will be merged under this rule, 1615-AC05.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels
Affected: None
Federalism: No
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have
international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of international
interest.
RIN Data Printed in the FR: No
Related RINs: Related to 1615-AB97
Agency Contact:
Kevin Cummings
Branch Chief, Business and Foreign Workers Division
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Second Floor, Office of Policy and Strategy, 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20529
Phone:202 272-1470
Fax:202 272-1480
Email: [email protected]
/* */ |
W***o
发帖数: 6519 | 9 猥琐男的春天看起来不远了啊
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: http://www.immigration-law.com/
: 11/20/2015: USCIS Submits on 11/19/2015 Proposed Rule for Employment-Based
: Immigration Modernization, aka Approved I-140 EAD/Portability
|
k******o
发帖数: 550 | 10 发EAD完全没问题，在递解程序里都可以有，DACA也是，不算先例。等着看身份怎么解决 |
|
|
w******1
发帖数: 96 | |
t********n
发帖数: 3178 | 12 就算往最乐观了想，还需要多久呢？H4EAD可是用了N年
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: http://www.immigration-law.com/
: 11/20/2015: USCIS Submits on 11/19/2015 Proposed Rule for Employment-Based
: Immigration Modernization, aka Approved I-140 EAD/Portability
|
i*******s
发帖数: 318 | 13 可否明言是谁? 任何一个华人版都该是不关我事少废话。要不就积极帮忙的风气.
如果有神经病阴阳怪气嫉妒找死。版务必须站出来封人. 否则本版还要版务做甚?
委托军班代管好了
【在 X**J 的大作中提到】
: 昨天会上提了，不过版上有些人居心拨测，心里不平衡，你懂的。我们还是集中正能量
: ，不要让有些人没事找事吧。 负能量多了，能帮忙的同胞都望而却步了。现在需要的
: 是团结和正能量。
:
: Worker
|
W***o
发帖数: 6519 | 14 still much better than hopeless waiting though....
【在 t********n 的大作中提到】
: 就算往最乐观了想，还需要多久呢？H4EAD可是用了N年
|
w********i
发帖数: 1721 | 15 看这个烙印的意思有两个rule-making加上一个memo
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomizedPrecision View Post
Thanks for the engaging call today and for everything that the IV Volunteers
are doing. Really thankful that Aman spared over 3+ hours to patiently
address all questions and Vikram for moderating the conversation really
really well.
As a part of AC21 reforms, I am tracking 3 separate things:
1. I-140 EAD / AP : This is the rule that we expect to be out soon
2. I-140 Ownership Guidance (Who owns it?)
3. Same or Similar Guidance
I realize that #1 is supposed to be issued via formal rule-making and that
will take its due course. However, are #2 and #3 also supposed to go through
the rule-making process or are they just Guidances \ Clarifications that
USCIS will issue separately from #1?
Any info on that would be great. Just trying to keep these things straight.
#3 is supposed to a Memo and this memo was sent to OMB more than month ago.
This is the same/similar fix.
#1 and #2 are related and should be done via the rule making that we are
expecting soon. In fact, my understanding is that #2 (I-140 ownership or "
remaining valid even after employer revokes") should be done first under the
so-called AC21 regulation. I-140 EAD/AP rule making should just then allow
I-140 employees to apply for EAD/AP based on that "remaining valid" I-140.
Keep in mind that there two rules in the agenda. 1615-AC05 and 1615-AB97
In summary, 1615-AB97 (AC21 reg) should define the I-140 (I140EAD reg)
ownership issue, while 1615-AC05 should give EAD/AP. And the effect is
freedom! |
D**s
发帖数: 6361 | 16 希望是好的，不过到大选之前，都不会有大进展的... |
w*l
发帖数: 933 | 17 应该不会有两个了.
RIN: 1615-AB97应该会包含在今天提交的RIN: 1615-AC05里了。
看AB97的最后一句：
USCIS is considering incorporating the provisions of the regulation into the
regulation titled Employment-based Immigration Modernization (RIN: 1615-
AC05)
Source:
http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201504&R
Volunteers
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 看这个烙印的意思有两个rule-making加上一个memo
: Quote:
: Originally Posted by RandomizedPrecision View Post
: Thanks for the engaging call today and for everything that the IV Volunteers
: are doing. Really thankful that Aman spared over 3+ hours to patiently
: address all questions and Vikram for moderating the conversation really
: really well.
: As a part of AC21 reforms, I am tracking 3 separate things:
: 1. I-140 EAD / AP : This is the rule that we expect to be out soon
: 2. I-140 Ownership Guidance (Who owns it?)
|
w********d
发帖数: 1131 | 18 ZT: Immigration voice
Words have meaning. When we go to the Hill (Congress) or Administration (DHS
) asking for Job MOBILITY, companies and lawyers go there asking for job
PORTABILITY
"Job MOBILITY" and "Job PORTABILITY" may sound the same, it may even rhyme,
but it ain't the same.
Job Portability means - if you change job, then you port or take your
priority date with you, so you can start your green card petition from
scratch again with the new employer using the priority date from your GC
petition from previous employer. But you will still have to maintain H1 (non
-immigrant) status with the new employer and everything. This system is
already in place. And AILA document advocates for Portability.
Job Mobility means - if your green card application is pending, you get EAD
+ AP after I140 so you can change jobs using the EAD. And your ongoing green
card petition will continue as is, and you can file for AOS with another
employer (which could be different from the original petitioning employer),
so you never have to start your GC process all over again from scratch once
your I-140 has been approved. So you no longer have to change jobs on H1
visa and will not have to apply for new H1 and new green card every time you
change jobs after approval of I-140.
IV has been pushing for Job MOBILITY. That is what AC21 regulation ought to
be about. And immigration lawyers and companies are trying to re-brand Job
MOBILITY as Job PORTABILITY.
Look at AILA's document again. You CANNOT find the word 'MOBILITY' in that
document. It only mentions PORTABILITY - meaning you will be slaves of H1
system for rest of your lives. Hey, if you have to file H1 and Green card
over and over again, guess who benefits? IMMIGRATION LAWYERS.
But if immigrants will get EADs and APs (which you can file yourself), it
will result in less number of H1 visa filing (for which lawyers charge 2000
to 8000 each) and less green card filings (for which lawyers charge $8000 to
$20,000) as you will no longer have to re-apply for H1 and green card over
and over again.
EAD+AP for I140 will mean immigration lawyers will get less work and
immigration lawyers will make less money. So what does an organization of
immigration lawyers do? They quietly push for agenda so that its members (
immigration lawyers) get more work by more H1 and GCs re-filings, to ensure
that members of their organization (immigration lawyers) make more money
even when number of H1s and GCs are not increased by Congress. This is how
organizations work to maximum the benefit of their members. Nothing wrong
with that. We just want it to be transparent to the people/immigrants who
are naive to believe that AILA's purpose is for a better system for
immigrants. |
w********i
发帖数: 1721 | 19 good catch
the
【在 w*l 的大作中提到】
: 应该不会有两个了.
: RIN: 1615-AB97应该会包含在今天提交的RIN: 1615-AC05里了。
: 看AB97的最后一句：
: USCIS is considering incorporating the provisions of the regulation into the
: regulation titled Employment-based Immigration Modernization (RIN: 1615-
: AC05)
: Source:
: http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201504&R
:
: Volunteers
|
w********i
发帖数: 1721 | 20 最新消息
11/20/2015: 140 EAD/Portability Reform Involves Two Proposed Rules Both of
Which Are Under Review by OMB Now
看来老印说的靠谱啊
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: good catch
:
: the
|
|
|
t********n
发帖数: 3178 | 21 最晚30天就能看见这两条是什么了，关键还是执行的时间，跟H4EAD一样的话受益的人
恐怕都还没来美国
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 最新消息
: 11/20/2015: 140 EAD/Portability Reform Involves Two Proposed Rules Both of
: Which Are Under Review by OMB Now
: 看来老印说的靠谱啊
|
s****a
发帖数: 397 | 22 oh law是否day dreaming。没有第二个rule了。
1615-AC05写的很清楚，1615-AB97 will be merged under this rule, 1615-AC05
也没有他说的economically significant, 明明写的是other significant
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 最新消息
: 11/20/2015: 140 EAD/Portability Reform Involves Two Proposed Rules Both of
: Which Are Under Review by OMB Now
: 看来老印说的靠谱啊
|
w*l
发帖数: 933 | 23 OH Law说的是RIN: 1615-ZB44
所有的pending都在官网可以找到：
http://www.reginfo.gov/public/jsp/EO/eoDashboard.jsp?agency_cd=
【在 s****a 的大作中提到】
: oh law是否day dreaming。没有第二个rule了。
: 1615-AC05写的很清楚，1615-AB97 will be merged under this rule, 1615-AC05
: 也没有他说的economically significant, 明明写的是other significant
|
w********i
发帖数: 1721 | 24 这种rule making确实是可快可慢. 看巴马急不急了. 14早一点的pd赶不上这波也是有
可能的.
【在 t********n 的大作中提到】
: 最晚30天就能看见这两条是什么了，关键还是执行的时间，跟H4EAD一样的话受益的人
: 恐怕都还没来美国
|
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 25 不想挑起事端，就算这里封板应该也都不能推动140 EAD. 如果有空的话 希望大家可以
多找人comments ，等rule出来团结华人，到各大网站去Post。让这个通过。 现在是个
求同存异的时候，多一个人能出力，多一份希望！
上次post 白宫请愿后看到很多同胞去sign,谢谢大家了，希望这次rule出来以后我们能
找到更多的人！
【在 i*******s 的大作中提到】
: 可否明言是谁? 任何一个华人版都该是不关我事少废话。要不就积极帮忙的风气.
: 如果有神经病阴阳怪气嫉妒找死。版务必须站出来封人. 否则本版还要版务做甚?
: 委托军班代管好了
|
c****b
发帖数: 115 | 26 这里写了Economically Significant: Yes啊。。。
http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eoDetails?rrid=125726
【在 s****a 的大作中提到】
: oh law是否day dreaming。没有第二个rule了。
: 1615-AC05写的很清楚，1615-AB97 will be merged under this rule, 1615-AC05
: 也没有他说的economically significant, 明明写的是other significant
|
i*******s
发帖数: 318 | 27 赞积极态度 支持一个。 下次发现有阴阳怪气的东西, 喊一声 我一定开骂。
就好比军班 大家平常骂骂咧咧 版主不站出来是知道大家搞笑。真有人发伤害民族感情
的贴。马上会被缝的. 我觉得移民班是不是也应该有原则的加强管理. 啥事情任何
人可以同意不同意 但说话少tmd 加强带棒的, 比喻讽刺连篇. 这不是文学班
【在 X**J 的大作中提到】
: 不想挑起事端，就算这里封板应该也都不能推动140 EAD. 如果有空的话 希望大家可以
: 多找人comments ，等rule出来团结华人，到各大网站去Post。让这个通过。 现在是个
: 求同存异的时候，多一个人能出力，多一份希望！
: 上次post 白宫请愿后看到很多同胞去sign,谢谢大家了，希望这次rule出来以后我们能
: 找到更多的人！
:
:
|
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 28 谢谢你，等rule for review的时候，咱们一起想想怎么可以找更多的人,让我们的声音
淹没 反合法移民的。
抄了几条不错的comments. 虽然现在post 有点早了。不过喜欢更多的人能够看到！
1. After EAD, people will invest more here than their home country.
2. Pay more taxes, since they can have more income.
3. Can buy home here without the fear to go back.
4. Can start business and employ US workers as well.
All these points are in favor of US economy.
【在 i*******s 的大作中提到】
: 赞积极态度 支持一个。 下次发现有阴阳怪气的东西, 喊一声 我一定开骂。
: 就好比军班 大家平常骂骂咧咧 版主不站出来是知道大家搞笑。真有人发伤害民族感情
: 的贴。马上会被缝的. 我觉得移民班是不是也应该有原则的加强管理. 啥事情任何
: 人可以同意不同意 但说话少tmd 加强带棒的, 比喻讽刺连篇. 这不是文学班
|
z****d
发帖数: 1761 | 29 非常有意义的一则消息啊，其实合法的跟合法的比起来少太多了，也安全多了，而且美
国就是个移民国家，拿抢工作说事情完全就是个靠不住的理由。 |
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 30 赞 link!!!
【在 c****b 的大作中提到】
: 这里写了Economically Significant: Yes啊。。。
: http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eoDetails?rrid=125726
|
|
|
w********i
发帖数: 1721 | |
o********0
发帖数: 2145 | |
s****l
发帖数: 277 | |
c*******s
发帖数: 71 | 34 同问
【在 s****l 的大作中提到】
: 带ap吗？？
|
b****h
发帖数: 2105 | 35 这个memo作用不是太大，还是等等那个rule
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 前面那个烙印说的memo出来了:
: http://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Outreach/Draft%2
|
y******u
发帖数: 804 | 36 Immigration Girl的猜测
There has been no talk of AP benefits as part of the EAD. But, be aware that
DACA recipients can apply for an AP to travel, same for TPS. I suspect they
will allow you to apply for an AP if you need to travel, but it will not be
included automatically in the EAD.
http://immigrationgirl.com/
【在 s****l 的大作中提到】
: 带ap吗？？
|
A****Y
发帖数: 993 | 37 赞！
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: http://www.immigration-law.com/
: 11/20/2015: USCIS Submits on 11/19/2015 Proposed Rule for Employment-Based
: Immigration Modernization, aka Approved I-140 EAD/Portability
|
y********9
发帖数: 88 | 38 如果通过了得话，下任上台也是能revoke的吧？ |
m****7
发帖数: 329 | 39 经过这么多程序出台的政策，一个人就能否决，这人也太牛逼了吧~？
除非像STEM那样程序上有问题。
【在 y********9 的大作中提到】
: 如果通过了得话，下任上台也是能revoke的吧？
|
W***o
发帖数: 6519 | |
|
|
w********i
发帖数: 1721 | 41 号称是12月开始comments.
【在 W***o 的大作中提到】
: 得啥时候能有消息？
|
w********d
发帖数: 1131 | 42 烙印们已经开始准备comments了， 如：
1.)We are stuck in EB backlogs .
2.)Not able to change employer
3.)No career progress
4.)stuck with same employer for many years and employers are exploting us (
no growth for employees in the company ).
5.)Work load , work responsibilities are growing , but no promotions \salary
revision\career progress etc..
6.)Our life is become very miserable because of uncertainity
7.)Finally we are treated like a modern slaves in office culture .
)
2.)Asking EAD point 2
3.)Asking AP point 3
4.)Remove minimum stay peroiod with Employer after I140 approved [ 6 month /
1 Year]
5.)No Need to maintain H1 Staus
6.)Issue Multiple Entry Visa for 10 Years along with I140 EAD + AP within US
7.)I-140 EAD/AP - for dependent kids that will save their visa status from
aging out before GC
8.)consider previous employers I140.
9.)No Sick leave, Off, vacation , Paternity leaves |
z**x
发帖数: 226 | 43 还要说到"limit maximum contribution". 比如，工作了好几年，有能力有经验担当更
大的活，却只能维持在原状态，不能充分作贡献。还比如，有了太多的uncertainity，
不敢过多地invest，经济不能更大程度的流通。
salary
【在 w********d 的大作中提到】
: 烙印们已经开始准备comments了， 如：
: 1.)We are stuck in EB backlogs .
: 2.)Not able to change employer
: 3.)No career progress
: 4.)stuck with same employer for many years and employers are exploting us (
: no growth for employees in the company ).
: 5.)Work load , work responsibilities are growing , but no promotions \salary
: revision\career progress etc..
: 6.)Our life is become very miserable because of uncertainity
: 7.)Finally we are treated like a modern slaves in office culture .
|
c******3
发帖数: 6509 | |
l******4
发帖数: 1105 | 45 my two cents:
我们要从美国社会的角度来讲，比如说影响投资，不能创业。其实都是一个事，就是看
从哪个角度讲。老美就喜欢搞得是明明对他自己有利，他说起来是对社会有多大贡献似
的。 |
c****b
发帖数: 115 | 46 不能同意更多！
【在 l******4 的大作中提到】
: my two cents:
: 我们要从美国社会的角度来讲，比如说影响投资，不能创业。其实都是一个事，就是看
: 从哪个角度讲。老美就喜欢搞得是明明对他自己有利，他说起来是对社会有多大贡献似
: 的。
|
a********m
发帖数: 15480 | 47 同意。光说什么对eb不公平没太大意义，eb本身就是为了米国经济做贡献，改进的方向
也是对米国有利才有意义。
【在 l******4 的大作中提到】
: my two cents:
: 我们要从美国社会的角度来讲，比如说影响投资，不能创业。其实都是一个事，就是看
: 从哪个角度讲。老美就喜欢搞得是明明对他自己有利，他说起来是对社会有多大贡献似
: 的。
|
F********r
发帖数: 1748 | 48 是，上去评论的主要写对美国的贡献，不要写自己多苦大仇深。uscis只为美国利益服
务。
同意。光说什么对eb不公平没太大意义，eb本身就是为了米国经济做贡献，改进的方向
也是对米国有利才有意义。
【在 a********m 的大作中提到】
: 同意。光说什么对eb不公平没太大意义，eb本身就是为了米国经济做贡献，改进的方向
: 也是对米国有利才有意义。
|
y******u
发帖数: 804 | 49 比如国内有资产，稳定之后想转移过来投资之类，显得多高大上啊
【在 F********r 的大作中提到】
: 是，上去评论的主要写对美国的贡献，不要写自己多苦大仇深。uscis只为美国利益服
: 务。
:
: 同意。光说什么对eb不公平没太大意义，eb本身就是为了米国经济做贡献，改进的方向
: 也是对米国有利才有意义。
|
M***0
发帖数: 1180 | |
