A****e
发帖数: 382 | 1 大家回头看看这厮在2月VB提醒大家的话就知道了，他的剧本早就写好了：
鳌拜的2月VB原话是这么说的：
“Once the level of new filings or USCIS processing increases significantly,
it will be necessary to slow or stop the movement of the cut-off. Readers
are once again advised that an eventual need to retrogress the cut-off date
is also a distinct possibility.”
New filings or USCIS processing increases significantly 是必然的，因为毕竟过
去的步伐不小，所以it will be necessary to slow or stop the movement of the
cut-off，然后呢，鳌拜把话先放下：Readers are once again advised that an
eventual need to retrogress the cut-off date is also a distinct possibility.
这个我早就在前面分析过：
http://74.53.4.74/article/EB23/31570105_3.html
所以大家要密切关注他最近额外加在里面的以前没有的东西，估计能发现一些蛛丝马迹。 | w*******t
发帖数: 2459 | 2 以后就叫他"奥奔"...这几个月VB的走法思路显然去年就谋划好了.
有点3012的影子...吸取了07大潮的教训.
一时间搞的版上现出了文革的场面..."亩产万斤"...
几个喊了半天,连08,09,10的PERM总量都没弄明白...
MAY的VB应该还是不动...关键是六月VB. 如果出现比较大的retrogress, 就很糟糕了.
这就意味着08,09的485总量的瓶颈(假设5月底,08-09的485大部分都交了).
对于10年剩下的, 什么时候能交485, 还是有变数的. | m******t
发帖数: 4077 | 3 这孙子就是个drama queer。
明明可以稳步前进，非要九浅一深。
significantly,
date
possibility.
【在 A****e 的大作中提到】
: 大家回头看看这厮在2月VB提醒大家的话就知道了，他的剧本早就写好了：
: 鳌拜的2月VB原话是这么说的：
: “Once the level of new filings or USCIS processing increases significantly,
: it will be necessary to slow or stop the movement of the cut-off. Readers
: are once again advised that an eventual need to retrogress the cut-off date
: is also a distinct possibility.”
: New filings or USCIS processing increases significantly 是必然的，因为毕竟过
: 去的步伐不小，所以it will be necessary to slow or stop the movement of the
: cut-off，然后呢，鳌拜把话先放下：Readers are once again advised that an
: eventual need to retrogress the cut-off date is also a distinct possibility.
| w****o
发帖数: 2260 | 4 你这马后炮，那你说说下月的排期吧！
【在 A****e 的大作中提到】
: 大家回头看看这厮在2月VB提醒大家的话就知道了，他的剧本早就写好了：
: 鳌拜的2月VB原话是这么说的：
: “Once the level of new filings or USCIS processing increases significantly,
: it will be necessary to slow or stop the movement of the cut-off. Readers
: are once again advised that an eventual need to retrogress the cut-off date
: is also a distinct possibility.”
: New filings or USCIS processing increases significantly 是必然的，因为毕竟过
: 去的步伐不小，所以it will be necessary to slow or stop the movement of the
: cut-off，然后呢，鳌拜把话先放下：Readers are once again advised that an
: eventual need to retrogress the cut-off date is also a distinct possibility.
|
|
