c**l
发帖数: 1022 | 1 大概内容就是用7%的法律条款来应付.我准备这样回.其实也就是重新把数据贴一遍.
I just want to point out that my inquiry has nothing to do with the 7% per
country limit. What I was asking was that the employment-based immigration
was treated unequally as family-based immigration.
All I am asking is just to be treated equally and it has nothing to do with
the per country limit.
I think the reply from VisaNet completely ignored the fact of the following
data. If possible could you re-submit my inquiry with the following data?
Thank you very much for your help!
EB or Employment Based:
Q1: total visa usage 24,040, only 17% of annual quota.
Q2: total visa usage 21,944, only 15% of annual quota.
Q3: total visa usage 36,128, only 25% of annual quota.
FB or Family Based:
Q1: total visa usage 62,955, 27.9% of annual quota
Q2: total visa usage 69,730, 30.9% of annual quota
Q3: total visa usage 67,480, 29.9% of annual quota |
|
