s****z
发帖数: 1501 | 1 绿卡办到哪步要选yes啊
比如律师去办了prevailing wage
公司去放了job order
那要选yes么
谢谢啦！ |
l***g
发帖数: 1035 | 2 only after file the 140
【在 s****z 的大作中提到】
: 绿卡办到哪步要选yes啊
: 比如律师去办了prevailing wage
: 公司去放了job order
: 那要选yes么
: 谢谢啦！
|
l**********n
发帖数: 2810 | 3 Did u file ur 485 yet? If not, no. |
s****z
发帖数: 1501 | |
a****l
发帖数: 8211 | 5 form 140 is "immigration petition".
【在 s****z 的大作中提到】
: 绿卡办到哪步要选yes啊
: 比如律师去办了prevailing wage
: 公司去放了job order
: 那要选yes么
: 谢谢啦！
|
l**********n
发帖数: 2810 | 6 140 is the company's petition for an immigrant worker - not an application
for permanent residence.There is a difference.
【在 a****l 的大作中提到】
: form 140 is "immigration petition".
|
I******e
发帖数: 6478 | 7 Has anyone ever filed an immigrant petition on your behalf
140上已经有了申请人的信息了
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: 140 is the company's petition for an immigrant worker - not an application
: for permanent residence.There is a difference.
|
a****l
发帖数: 8211 | 8 The question is "Has anyone ever filed an immigrant petition on your behalf"
The title of form 140 is "Immigration Petition for Alien Worker", part 3 is
"Information About the Person for Whom You are Filling", so very apparently
form 140 (or 130 or anything similiar) is "someone filed an immigration on
your behalf". 140 is company's immigration petition for one specific worker,
not just any worker.
The application for permanent residence is actually 485, you can apply for
permanent residence when you have an approved immigration petition.
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: 140 is the company's petition for an immigrant worker - not an application
: for permanent residence.There is a difference.
|
j******0
发帖数: 558 | 9 after I485
【在 s****z 的大作中提到】
: 绿卡办到哪步要选yes啊
: 比如律师去办了prevailing wage
: 公司去放了job order
: 那要选yes么
: 谢谢啦！
|
a****l
发帖数: 8211 | 10 saying "No" is an unnecessary risk, especially when you are applying for h1.
Your green card can be revoked any time for this reason. |
|
|
E**********7
发帖数: 495 | 11 I completely agree with you that "No" answer is wrong once I-140 has been
filed. I-140 IS "immigration petition" filed on your behalf.
But this misrepresentation should only affect the visa, not the GC.
h1.
【在 a****l 的大作中提到】
: saying "No" is an unnecessary risk, especially when you are applying for h1.
: Your green card can be revoked any time for this reason.
|
a***n
发帖数: 665 | 12 you both are right - once I-140 was filed, one needs to answer "YES"
to this question.
I completely agree with you that "No" answer is wrong once I-140 has been
filed. I-140 IS "immigration petition" filed on your behalf.
But this misrepresentation should only affect the visa, not the GC.
h1.
【在 E**********7 的大作中提到】
: I completely agree with you that "No" answer is wrong once I-140 has been
: filed. I-140 IS "immigration petition" filed on your behalf.
: But this misrepresentation should only affect the visa, not the GC.
:
: h1.
|
a****l
发帖数: 8211 | 13 actually it definitely would. If you applied for h1 to enter US (with this
false answer),then adjusted to PR through 485, it can be considered that you
provided false information to enter US, and since entering US is the basis
for obtaining 485, it can be inferred that you provided false information to
obtain 485/green card, thus 485 can be revoked, anytime uscis found out
about it. For this reason I say it is a totally unnecessary risk.
【在 E**********7 的大作中提到】
: I completely agree with you that "No" answer is wrong once I-140 has been
: filed. I-140 IS "immigration petition" filed on your behalf.
: But this misrepresentation should only affect the visa, not the GC.
:
: h1.
|
y**********g
发帖数: 143 | 14 If I am on H1B and my I140 has been approved, my wife is H4 or F1 Visa, when
she applies for the H4 or F1 Visa, how should she answer this question?
you
basis
to
【在 a****l 的大作中提到】
: actually it definitely would. If you applied for h1 to enter US (with this
: false answer),then adjusted to PR through 485, it can be considered that you
: provided false information to enter US, and since entering US is the basis
: for obtaining 485, it can be inferred that you provided false information to
: obtain 485/green card, thus 485 can be revoked, anytime uscis found out
: about it. For this reason I say it is a totally unnecessary risk.
|
a****l
发帖数: 8211 | 15 no, her answer is no. because that 140 has nothing to do with her.
when
【在 y**********g 的大作中提到】
: If I am on H1B and my I140 has been approved, my wife is H4 or F1 Visa, when
: she applies for the H4 or F1 Visa, how should she answer this question?
:
: you
: basis
: to
|
p***e
发帖数: 29053 | |
w*******t
发帖数: 2459 | 17 As I remember, the question is to ask the status of H1 holder in the form.
To her/his best knowledge, H-4 applicant has to answer whether the principal
does it or not...
【在 a****l 的大作中提到】
: no, her answer is no. because that 140 has nothing to do with her.
:
: when
|
p***e
发帖数: 29053 | 18 以前156是要问的，DS160没有问的呀
principal
【在 w*******t 的大作中提到】
: As I remember, the question is to ask the status of H1 holder in the form.
: To her/his best knowledge, H-4 applicant has to answer whether the principal
: does it or not...
|
y**********g
发帖数: 143 | 19 我也觉得有点奇怪，我去年帮我妈填DS160的时候。好像也没有看到这个问题，今年我
太太回去签证，她就看到了，不知道什么原因，难道这些问题是随机的？
另外， 这个问题会因为签证类型不同而变化吗？譬如象楼上说的，申请H4的话，就问
H1那个人是不是已经在申请绿卡？我太太说她没有看到什么不同，她记得就是问申请人
自己的情况。
【在 p***e 的大作中提到】
: 以前156是要问的，DS160没有问的呀
:
: principal
|
a***n
发帖数: 665 | 20 last year, when i applied for H1b visa in TJ, no such question
was asked in the DS-160. But i just tried the online DS-160 again,
and this IS one of the questions (at least for H1-b applicant).
【在 y**********g 的大作中提到】
: 我也觉得有点奇怪，我去年帮我妈填DS160的时候。好像也没有看到这个问题，今年我
: 太太回去签证，她就看到了，不知道什么原因，难道这些问题是随机的？
: 另外， 这个问题会因为签证类型不同而变化吗？譬如象楼上说的，申请H4的话，就问
: H1那个人是不是已经在申请绿卡？我太太说她没有看到什么不同，她记得就是问申请人
: 自己的情况。
|
|
|
H*********S
发帖数: 22772 | 21 只要还没有递交485，都不算
【在 s****z 的大作中提到】
: 绿卡办到哪步要选yes啊
: 比如律师去办了prevailing wage
: 公司去放了job order
: 那要选yes么
: 谢谢啦！
|
s****y
发帖数: 581 | 22 主申请人递I－１４０后，就算＇Yes＇。
但是，主申请人配偶如H４就不算，所以＇No＇。主申请人配偶只有在I－４８５递减后
，才算＇Yes＇。
以上是明确的，我为这个问题，问过所有我认识的移民律师和专家，还有老ID，答案都
是一值的。
【在 H*********S 的大作中提到】
: 只要还没有递交485，都不算
|
a***n
发帖数: 665 | 23 这个值得mark。
【在 s****y 的大作中提到】
: 主申请人递I－１４０后，就算＇Yes＇。
: 但是，主申请人配偶如H４就不算，所以＇No＇。主申请人配偶只有在I－４８５递减后
: ，才算＇Yes＇。
: 以上是明确的，我为这个问题，问过所有我认识的移民律师和专家，还有老ID，答案都
: 是一值的。
|
l**********n
发帖数: 2810 | 24 正好跟我咨询的结果相反，跟我自己的经验也相反。
【在 s****y 的大作中提到】
: 主申请人递I－１４０后，就算＇Yes＇。
: 但是，主申请人配偶如H４就不算，所以＇No＇。主申请人配偶只有在I－４８５递减后
: ，才算＇Yes＇。
: 以上是明确的，我为这个问题，问过所有我认识的移民律师和专家，还有老ID，答案都
: 是一值的。
|
S****n
发帖数: 519 | 25 就这么简单的一个事儿，有没有标准答案？
减后
案都
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: 正好跟我咨询的结果相反，跟我自己的经验也相反。
|
l**********n
发帖数: 2810 | 26 一个可能本身就模棱两可，另一个可能是很多律师本身也不确定。反正我140批了，而
且一直填的No。
【在 S****n 的大作中提到】
: 就这么简单的一个事儿，有没有标准答案？
:
: 减后
: 案都
|
