c**********t 发帖数: 80 | 1 I was off line and could not join the discussion last night. But now I believe
my proof is correct. The key to the proof is that if there does not exist a
segment of length 1/n, then there does not exist a segment of length k/n, for
any integer k. This will induce a contradiction at k=n. And such a proof does
explicitly require the length of the segment being the reciprocal of an
integer. The proof does not apply to general 1/a.
In fact, now I think the above key insight can be further genera | f******k 发帖数: 297 | 2 now you convinced me this is a correct one. so both parts are
solved :)
【在 c**********t 的大作中提到】 : I was off line and could not join the discussion last night. But now I believe : my proof is correct. The key to the proof is that if there does not exist a : segment of length 1/n, then there does not exist a segment of length k/n, for : any integer k. This will induce a contradiction at k=n. And such a proof does : explicitly require the length of the segment being the reciprocal of an : integer. The proof does not apply to general 1/a. : In fact, now I think the above key insight can be further genera
| c***r 发帖数: 46 | 3 This one seems correct to me. :)
【在 f******k 的大作中提到】 : now you convinced me this is a correct one. so both parts are : solved :)
|
|