由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - 特别记录 Global Times 2016.10.12 【记录历史】谁重复验证了NgAgo?
相关主题
DNA Electrophoresis, Image Manipulation and so on so forth转 “韩春雨撤回论文”那家报道最狠?
关于HAN讨论的一点建议Invited Review for General public
Iamback又向澳洲哥开火了如何查一篇文章被引用的次数?
Nature News: The controversy over NgAgo请教:how to motivate students/postdocs?
澎湃第三弹:自然报道不应作为韩春雨实验可重复的证据how to motivate students/postdocs? 之我见
关于NgAgo的一些吐槽外行请教,Baylor College of Medicine这个学校咋样? (转载)
Questions about NgAgo我给所有联署人群信提到的一个想法
Nature News: NgAgo gene-editing controversy escalates in peer-reviewed papers转发:2015年国际青年学者东湖论坛—生命科学分论坛
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: global话题: ngago话题: times话题: han话题: august
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
c********n
发帖数: 225
1
特别记录
Date:2016年10月12日
Title:Scholars call for probe into NgAgo claims
Link:
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1010811.shtml
Key points:
1. Global Times article
2. twitter link:
https://twitter.com/globaltimesnews/status/786179634400468992
原文引用
“In August, Han had told the Global Times that foreign scientists'
accusations reveal their motive of ganging up against NgAgo. He had also
expressed his willingness to share his raw data and testing conditions.
Facing the doubts, the HUST told Xinhua in August that Han would "publicly
verify" his findings under the supervision of an "authoritative third party"
in a month, but no follow-up has been announced yet.
Han and the university could not be reached for comment as of press time.”
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
转发:2015年国际青年学者东湖论坛—生命科学分论坛澎湃第三弹:自然报道不应作为韩春雨实验可重复的证据
华中科技大学生命科学与技术学院招聘启事 (转载)关于NgAgo的一些吐槽
感觉韩春雨做科研的境界比颜宁高Questions about NgAgo
zz颜宁对韩春雨的评论Nature News: NgAgo gene-editing controversy escalates in peer-reviewed papers
DNA Electrophoresis, Image Manipulation and so on so forth转 “韩春雨撤回论文”那家报道最狠?
关于HAN讨论的一点建议Invited Review for General public
Iamback又向澳洲哥开火了如何查一篇文章被引用的次数?
Nature News: The controversy over NgAgo请教:how to motivate students/postdocs?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: global话题: ngago话题: times话题: han话题: august