l**********1
发帖数: 5204 | 1 奇了 怪了 没啥人曝这条吗 快一周了 哈
09/05/2012
Glasgow’s Beatson Institute investigating circumstances of Cell retraction
for inappropriate images
with 6 comments
The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, Scotland is looking
into how inappropriate images ended up in a Cell paper that has just been
retracted.
Here’s the notice for the paper by Lynne Marshall, Niall S. Kenneth, and
Robert J. White:
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article
Withdrawal http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.
This article has been retracted at the request of the Authors.
Our paper reported that overexpression of tRNAiMet can promote cell
proliferation and transformation. It has now become clear that images in
several figures are duplications that do not represent the experiments
described in the legends. Although we remain convinced that tRNAiMet can
have proliferative and oncogenic effects based on subsequent work in our lab
and others, given these issues with the validity of the figures, we believe
the most appropriate course of action is to retract the paper. We deeply
regret this circumstance and apologize to the community. The first author, L
.M., has not agreed to this Retraction.
We wanted to know whether there had been an investigation, and why Marshall
had declined to sign the notice. Professor Karen Vousden, director of the
Beatson Institute, tells Retraction Watch:
We launched an investigation into this matter and we’re unable to comment
further until the investigation is complete. All authors were invited to
sign the retraction notice.
Senior author Robert White told us he is out on sick leave.
We’ve tried to reach Marshall, now until July a post-doctoral fellow at the
University of Alberta in Calgary, for comment, and will update with
anything we learn.
The Cell paper has been cited 84 times, according to Thomson Scientific’s
Web of Knowledge.
Second-to-last paragraph updated 5 p.m. Eastern, 9/10/12, with new
information about when Marshall’s Calgary postdoc ended.
link:
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/glasgows-beatso | l**********1
发帖数: 5204 | | D*a
发帖数: 6830 | 3 每次看到Although we remain convinced that blablabla就特别想笑，哈哈
08年的paper，citation该计入的都计入了，对cell没影响啊。 | G***y
发帖数: 1082 | 4 The comment is awesome:
"Inappropriate images”…I was hoping for at least an R-rated issue of Cell
…"
retraction
【在 l**********1 的大作中提到】
: 奇了 怪了 没啥人曝这条吗 快一周了 哈
: 09/05/2012
: Glasgow’s Beatson Institute investigating circumstances of Cell retraction
: for inappropriate images
: with 6 comments
: The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, Scotland is looking
: into how inappropriate images ended up in a Cell paper that has just been
: retracted.
: Here’s the notice for the paper by Lynne Marshall, Niall S. Kenneth, and
: Robert J. White:
| n******2
发帖数: 971 | | m**p
发帖数: 2471 | 6 repeat成功了还是失败了？
【在 n******2 的大作中提到】
: 尼玛啊~啊~啊
: 天下还有我这么不幸的人吗？
|
|
