j***w
发帖数: 938 | 1 我越来越对研究生物蛋白质感兴趣了，想拿到博士学位后再读一个生化博士，专门研究
蛋白质功能和结构。做生物的都知道，想取得不错的成果，除了自身努力外，与实验室
的水平分不开。所以，想听听各位的意见，有没有了解这个的，谢谢先！ |
n***g
发帖数: 5027 | 2 请说说具体方向啊，这个太笼统了，大部分实验室都做点蛋白相关的啊 |
d********m
发帖数: 3662 | 3 LZ这么有志向，那给你推荐了牛的。SYG，而且都不用再杀鸡了 |
b******y
发帖数: 627 | 4 Are you sure that you are not naive? Ask yourself this question for ten
times over a month. Come with the same question after that. |
j***w
发帖数: 938 | 5 像SYG那样的做蛋白的，但是要在美国的
【在 n***g 的大作中提到】
: 请说说具体方向啊，这个太笼统了，大部分实验室都做点蛋白相关的啊
|
j***w
发帖数: 938 | 6 那还不如回去做薄厚呢
要美国这边的
【在 d********m 的大作中提到】
: LZ这么有志向，那给你推荐了牛的。SYG，而且都不用再杀鸡了
|
j***w
发帖数: 938 | 7 为什么这么说？
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: Are you sure that you are not naive? Ask yourself this question for ten
: times over a month. Come with the same question after that.
|
b******y
发帖数: 627 | 8 If it were 15 years ago, your thought might lead you somewhere substantial,
i.e. being a successful PI in a decent institute. However, we are in year
2012. There are 1000+ labs actively in solving structures in the world. X-
ray crystallography is so mature that anyone of them can solve important
targets on yearly basis. Let alone EM is catching up and NMR steals a small
slice. By the time you are ready to do something, all the low hanging fruits
are gone and the entry barrier to any specific fields is too high.
However, the above-mentioned problem is not most worrisome one. There will
simply be not many positions (faculty or industry) available for x-ray
crystallographers, while there will be more x-ray crystallographers floating
around. I can bet my money on this statement.
Why bother? Or at least be cautious. |
