boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - 蒲慕明教授对网络意见的回应
相关主题
蒲慕明:不著袈衣亦如来
蒲慕明:不著袈衣亦如来
蒲慕明:但求慈航心中渡
四月冷泉港在苏州的Crick神经年会是蒲慕明策划的?
中国科学的两条道路
蒲慕明拿1.8亿
蒲慕明批评施一公和饶毅,呼吁科学家自律
11公饶毅回应蒲慕明ZT
后留学时代与后归国时代[转载] (转载)
ZT 蒲慕明:中国科学“病”在何处
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: funding话题: china话题: system话题: scientists
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
G******O
发帖数: 189
1
转自www.changhai.org by chang905.
Based on the reaction on the web so far, I think I may have overlooked the
extent of funding problem in many of China's universities and research
institutions. My statement "I do not know any productive scientist in China
who is not well-funded" may be relevant only in biomedical sciences and in
more elite institutions. Also, I have not been sympathetic enough to many
scientists who are apparently stressed by the lack of funding and feel
powerless in changing the situation. Asking them for self-discipline does
not strike the cord.
I have seen much waste in elite laboratories and institutions, and have
clearly proposed that a solution for the funding problem is to shift the
money for mega-projects to smaller investigator-initiated projects, by
increasing both the number and size of the latter grants. This is apparently
ignored by many viewers. My point that current community fails to react to
misconduct properly is also ignored.
I fully agree that the funding system has to be changed. However, at present
, I do not think drastic changes in the system will necessarily bring a more
fair system. If there is no self-discipline and ethical standard on the
part of scientists involved in the review and funding processes, no system
will yield fair results.
There is also a philosophical issue that I would not go into now - whether
Chinese science ought to move further along the elitist route or a
democratic route. Is it more important to have a few Nobel prize winners or
to have a large population of active research scientists, who may not
achieve as much in their own research but would contribute more to the
spread of science and scientific culture into our society?
Z**********g
发帖数: 222
2
没完没了了?能不能学习一下晓东同志啊.
b****y
发帖数: 105
3
能站出来说话的人越多越好,甭管有没有道理,都闷声大发财了倒是不好了

the
China
in
many
does

【在 G******O 的大作中提到】
: 转自www.changhai.org by chang905.
: Based on the reaction on the web so far, I think I may have overlooked the
: extent of funding problem in many of China's universities and research
: institutions. My statement "I do not know any productive scientist in China
: who is not well-funded" may be relevant only in biomedical sciences and in
: more elite institutions. Also, I have not been sympathetic enough to many
: scientists who are apparently stressed by the lack of funding and feel
: powerless in changing the situation. Asking them for self-discipline does
: not strike the cord.
: I have seen much waste in elite laboratories and institutions, and have

I***a
发帖数: 13467
4
能力越强得人,责任越重,
晓东同志应该适当发表一点
p****p
发帖数: 3360
5
没完没了才是目的,同学。这样才有深入讨论。

【在 Z**********g 的大作中提到】
: 没完没了了?能不能学习一下晓东同志啊.
j**********k
发帖数: 296
6
re这个。做人要低调,做事要高调。

【在 Z**********g 的大作中提到】
: 没完没了了?能不能学习一下晓东同志啊.
i***R
发帖数: 663
7
You really got a lot of kills in uncharted 2.

【在 j**********k 的大作中提到】
: re这个。做人要低调,做事要高调。
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
ZT 蒲慕明:中国科学“病”在何处
施一公饶毅回应《蒲慕明:中国科学“病”在何处》
坑杀饶毅的黑手是谁?
饶毅,施一公,王晓东, 饶子和,蒲慕明,谁的武功更高?请排座次。 (转载)
Re: 中科院神经所2012年年会蒲慕明所长的讲话 (转载)
好久没见生物版有蒲慕明的新闻了
zz: 饶毅博文:中科院神经所查处一起学术不端
被那封霸气的邮件吸引,问个生理学问题
八卦兼吐槽一下
中科院蒲慕明获格鲁伯神经科学奖,获奖者问鼎诺奖
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: funding话题: china话题: system话题: scientists