由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Belief版 - Falsifiability and Natural Selection
相关主题
Re: [转载] Re: 怎么这一段时间这里的人气这么差达尔文从信到不信的转变 (进化?!)
Re: Are you serious on debate? I highly doubt it.[合集] 推薦Stanford 線上課程 Darwin's Legacy
Modern thoughts in evolution as Neo-Darwinian (Z)[合集] 凑热闹:SCIENCE VS. RELIGION (Z)
孟德尔 Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)If Darwin has really killed God, when was the funeral? (Z)
Interesting show NG channel:"Was Darwin wrong?"转: 概率计算否定了进化论的核心
[合集] 批判《游子吟〉〉之3 zzlittletshirt 的拙劣謊言 (转载)
On Darwin's 200th, a theory still in controversy (zz)[合集] 关于宗教的最好的说法。。。
达尔文诞辰200周年,教廷承认进化论也谈科学PK基督教
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: selection话题: natural话题: philosophy话题: 1969
进入Belief版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
b*****h
发帖数: 3386
1
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3749996.pdf (1969)
Popper's Falsifiability and Darwin's Natural Selection
Author(s): K. K. Lee
Source: Philosophy, Vol. 44, No. 170 (Oct., 1969), pp. 291-302
Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Institute of
Philosophy
俺最近的厕所读物。 读完了,再报告一下G点所在。大家有兴趣的,可以读读。
s*****n
发帖数: 209
2
It is a tough read. As I have always suspected, philosophers typically have
nothing useful to say behind the complicated language.
It appears that he mainly uses Darwin's original work to
attack Darwinism, whilst Darwinism has progressed with time.
(By contrast, it is reasonable to attack the orginal Bible,
as long as it is considered as an absolute truth.)
All scientific theories progress precisely by trying to
satisfy the Popper's Falsifiability. What could not be explained
became
b*****h
发帖数: 3386
3
还没看到那么远。 不过我怀疑作者指的是:given the age of earth is
about <10k according to the bible, such an earth where a life
can evolve does not exist. 当然作者不相信这个biblical age.
不过这个怀疑当时的确存在。后来地质证明地球有50亿历史,证实了进化论
所作的预测--地球需要很古老,才能进化出现在丰富多彩的生命。

have

【在 s*****n 的大作中提到】
: It is a tough read. As I have always suspected, philosophers typically have
: nothing useful to say behind the complicated language.
: It appears that he mainly uses Darwin's original work to
: attack Darwinism, whilst Darwinism has progressed with time.
: (By contrast, it is reasonable to attack the orginal Bible,
: as long as it is considered as an absolute truth.)
: All scientific theories progress precisely by trying to
: satisfy the Popper's Falsifiability. What could not be explained
: became

s*****n
发帖数: 209
4
He did mention ``the immense geological time-scale,'' so he must
be aware of the age of the earth. (The paper was published in
1969.) So it is rather puzzling for his physicists' statement.
I did speed reading. It is not worth the time to slow read
any philosopher's book.

【在 b*****h 的大作中提到】
: 还没看到那么远。 不过我怀疑作者指的是:given the age of earth is
: about <10k according to the bible, such an earth where a life
: can evolve does not exist. 当然作者不相信这个biblical age.
: 不过这个怀疑当时的确存在。后来地质证明地球有50亿历史,证实了进化论
: 所作的预测--地球需要很古老,才能进化出现在丰富多彩的生命。
:
: have

b*****h
发帖数: 3386
5
哈哈。

【在 s*****n 的大作中提到】
: He did mention ``the immense geological time-scale,'' so he must
: be aware of the age of the earth. (The paper was published in
: 1969.) So it is rather puzzling for his physicists' statement.
: I did speed reading. It is not worth the time to slow read
: any philosopher's book.

b*****h
发帖数: 3386
6
Actually, I generally enjoy reading philosophies in English,
not in Chinese. It is much more clearly phrased in English ...

【在 s*****n 的大作中提到】
: He did mention ``the immense geological time-scale,'' so he must
: be aware of the age of the earth. (The paper was published in
: 1969.) So it is rather puzzling for his physicists' statement.
: I did speed reading. It is not worth the time to slow read
: any philosopher's book.

1 (共1页)
进入Belief版参与讨论
相关主题
也谈科学PK基督教Interesting show NG channel:"Was Darwin wrong?"
A work in progress[合集] 批判《游子吟〉〉之3 zz
人民政协报 VS NatureOn Darwin's 200th, a theory still in controversy (zz)
Hallucinate Naturally Within Seconds达尔文诞辰200周年,教廷承认进化论
Re: [转载] Re: 怎么这一段时间这里的人气这么差达尔文从信到不信的转变 (进化?!)
Re: Are you serious on debate? I highly doubt it.[合集] 推薦Stanford 線上課程 Darwin's Legacy
Modern thoughts in evolution as Neo-Darwinian (Z)[合集] 凑热闹:SCIENCE VS. RELIGION (Z)
孟德尔 Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)If Darwin has really killed God, when was the funeral? (Z)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: selection话题: natural话题: philosophy话题: 1969