c**l
发帖数: 76 | 1 那巫术，炼金，星相等等按照这一被你阉割的定义也可以被称为科学了。可惜了。
科学理论当然不是数据的堆积，但是科学理论要由，也只能由直接或间接事实
来验证，也就是证实或证伪。你先前却告诉我“一个理论的证明,不是用事实的
堆积来进行的”。你看来就是没有理解力。
"none of the supposed links of plant to animal, fish to amphibian, amphibian
to reptile, or reptile to birds and mammals are represented nor any
transitional forms at all",好吧，你告诉我，这句话从另一个角度怎么理解。你来解
释一下，OK?
再把原先的找出来
CREL:
废话，你没看还是没看懂我的反驳？给了你东西又不去看，偏要等着被
KICK ASS。回去看看我的“进化是什么”。
或者
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html
以上是原先的 (post #3056)。
我给你的东西有一堆transiti | c**l
发帖数: 76 | 2 Do not want to discuss what is science any more? OK.
Presumably you have read the link that I posted.
你可以自由选择你的信仰，因为信仰是不需要证据的。
However, If you play in science area, follow its rule.
About Lady Hope, she cannot provide any evidence that Darwin was converted at
his deathbed. And her self-claimed statement is quite interesting. (see my
previous post, in JHQ now)
And considering Darwin was well known agnostic, that is why I call her liar.
Hope's statement as Darwin said.
"I was a young man with unf |
|
