g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 1 3年21 Million，10几20个队分，一个队也就1M，一年30万也就够签个
undrafted的。
Gilbert went on to complain that the trade would save the Lakers
"approximately $20 million in salaries and approximately $21 million
in luxury taxes." Why is this a problem? Wasn't the point of the lockout
to change the system so that teams will no longer overspend? Isn't
the more punitive luxury tax supposed to dissuade teams from spending
above the tax line? Since when is it a bad thing when a team saves
money?
Gilbert provides the answer: "That $21 million goes to non-taxpaying
teams and to fund revenue sharing." |
G*******s
发帖数: 10605 | 2 come on, 搞到一个team还是挺多的，能多签下来一个不错的player了，当然要
complain
这就跟让你给30个人每人发500伪币，500伪币算个屁，但是到你那就是一万五了
你这个人啊，跟laker,kobe不沾边的还公正，一旦沾上边就偏的没谱
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: 3年21 Million，10几20个队分，一个队也就1M，一年30万也就够签个
: undrafted的。
: Gilbert went on to complain that the trade would save the Lakers
: "approximately $20 million in salaries and approximately $21 million
: in luxury taxes." Why is this a problem? Wasn't the point of the lockout
: to change the system so that teams will no longer overspend? Isn't
: the more punitive luxury tax supposed to dissuade teams from spending
: above the tax line? Since when is it a bad thing when a team saves
: money?
: Gilbert provides the answer: "That $21 million goes to non-taxpaying
|
s*******u
发帖数: 1855 | 3 这个一个队也不是骑士,是湖人好不好.湖人多出钱跟gilbert什么关?gilbert care的是
他少分那份,也就是1/N,就是bug说的.
【在 G*******s 的大作中提到】
: come on, 搞到一个team还是挺多的，能多签下来一个不错的player了，当然要
: complain
: 这就跟让你给30个人每人发500伪币，500伪币算个屁，但是到你那就是一万五了
: 你这个人啊，跟laker,kobe不沾边的还公正，一旦沾上边就偏的没谱
|
t**********r
发帖数: 2019 | 4 complain个球啊，联盟费这么大劲儿定奢侈税，为的不就是限制球队疯狂消费么，现在
人家要降低payroll, 不符合联盟的初衷么？他写封信说不能让他们省这个钱，省了就
少了本来要分给我们的那份。这什么逻辑？纯粹扯淡啊。
【在 G*******s 的大作中提到】
: come on, 搞到一个team还是挺多的，能多签下来一个不错的player了，当然要
: complain
: 这就跟让你给30个人每人发500伪币，500伪币算个屁，但是到你那就是一万五了
: 你这个人啊，跟laker,kobe不沾边的还公正，一旦沾上边就偏的没谱
|
n***g
发帖数: 5027 | 5 搞完lbj，再搞科比，
骑士老板V5
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: 3年21 Million，10几20个队分，一个队也就1M，一年30万也就够签个
: undrafted的。
: Gilbert went on to complain that the trade would save the Lakers
: "approximately $20 million in salaries and approximately $21 million
: in luxury taxes." Why is this a problem? Wasn't the point of the lockout
: to change the system so that teams will no longer overspend? Isn't
: the more punitive luxury tax supposed to dissuade teams from spending
: above the tax line? Since when is it a bad thing when a team saves
: money?
: Gilbert provides the answer: "That $21 million goes to non-taxpaying
|
