l***s
发帖数: 841 | 1 U01也分两种。Single project U01的话， junior PI也可以试一试。格式和R01一样，
申请难度也差不多，钱也不是特别多 （2X R01）。 若是大的U01 （8x R01)，junior
PI （AP level） 一般肯定没戏。 |
|
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 3 You should focus on R01. U01 is also very political. My old PI has a U01
and he told me his score clearly are out of funding range. However, someone
said something during the counsel meeting and was funded. He won't tell me
what's been said. |
|
z****3
发帖数: 108 | 4 老板拿到了一个U01 grant。那位大侠知道U01是怎样的基金，多少钱，那多久呀？谢谢
！ |
|
G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 5 which is difficult to get, R01 or U01? |
|
d******a
发帖数: 1047 | 6 I believe U01 is harder, it requires multi-PI |
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 7 U01, Research Project, To support a discrete, specified, circumscribed
project to be performed by the named investigator(s) in an area representing
his specific interest and competencies.
R01, Modular Research Grant Application, The modular research grant
procedures will affect the NIH peer review process by enabling reviewers to
evaluate proposed project budgets on the basis of a general, expert estimate
of the total effort and resources required to conduct the proposed research
. Reviewers wil... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
f*******h
发帖数: 1269 | 9 感觉panel很不靠谱。
我的U01 panel, 居然没有一个相关方向的。 |
|
Y**********7
发帖数: 86 | 10 是PAR-12-288 (Early-Stage Development of Informatics Technology (U01)) 吗？ |
|
F********h
发帖数: 346 | 11 还有几个月开始做新AP，这个U01加我总共四个faculties，我应该要求co-PI么。如果
有幸申请上是不是就没有NIH的New Investigator Status了。另外，这个Grant
submission会比我入职早一个礼拜左右，
应该没什么问题吧。 |
|
G***y
发帖数: 1082 | 12 If the amount of money you will get from the U01 is smaller than an R01, I
wouldn't ask for a co-PI and lose the NIS. |
|
F********h
发帖数: 346 | 13 是一个小U01，分给我最多150k每年吧，比R01少。那我是不是应该要求Co-I或
subcontract。这样还能分到这么多钱么，谢谢回复。 |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 14 First, if you are not a big bull or have political connection don't even
waste your time. P grants are PROJECT grants usually focus on similar
research that requires multiple PIs. U grants are more fitted into
translational grants, U01s usually involve basic science researchers and
physicians. U grant can also be a core service grant such as tissue
depository etc. My former PI has a U grant, you dont' want to know how much
politic is involved. I was one of the investigators in a P grant and... 阅读全帖 |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 15 No, U01 usually involve clinicians or large multi-center projects. It is
around 1.5 million a year for 5 years. It is about 5x the amount of R01 but
usually involve multiple lab and institution. The PI's lab's share is
about a R01 size. The PI also has less flexibility at adjusting efforts.
There are also milestone goal need to be accomplished, or the funding will
stop (I don't know how tightly the enforcement is though). |
|
s*******e
发帖数: 740 | 16 别人说的是对的
U01差别很大，两年的也有，五年的也有。从不到五十万到五百万以上都有可能
but |
|
a*q
发帖数: 2109 | 17 Multi center的一般是U54或者U19吧，U01也有很多基础研究的，不是特别大。U和R跟P
的本质区别前面有人也说了，就是它是一个contract而不是grant，你是必须完成一开
始跟NIH说好了的东西的。
but |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 18 The cost you see on the NIH RePORTER includes indirect cost. Some institute
have close to 100% indirect. That's why you see ~500K for a single R01.
The >2 million ones are all P01 or U01 which is shared by many PIs. My old
boss has an U01 (also U01 budget is very detail), he still runs out of money
at year end.
500k |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 19 The cost you see on the NIH RePORTER includes indirect cost. Some institute
have close to 100% indirect. That's why you see ~500K for a single R01.
The >2 million ones are all P01 or U01 which is shared by many PIs. My old
boss has an U01 (also U01 budget is very detail), he still runs out of money
at year end.
500k |
|
l********s
发帖数: 395 | 20 Last week, I contacted the PO about the borderline U01 score. I asked if
they would consider co-funding, since that I am a Project Leader of a COBRE
that is going to get funded. PO gave me some advice, if co-funding would be
a possibility.
Then last Friday I found out that U01 could not be co-funded through COBRE..
..
This Monday I sent the PO an email to report this situation, and asked him
when the council would meet. He emailed me the date Tuesday.
Today I got an auto-email saying that the su... 阅读全帖 |
|
b******k
发帖数: 1874 | 21 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
flyingsoul (flyingsoul) 于 (Sun Dec 16 11:40:02 2012, 美东) 提到:
有几点想法：
A。Option 1
1。所有武器应该毁灭，包括枪支。联合国应该制定一个条约，即便在战场上，也不允
许使用真枪实弹，一律用联合国认可的麻醉弹代替，使对方暂时死亡。
2。任何拥有枪支者，当以图谋杀人罪论处。（枪是什么？是强制结束别人生命的装置
。）
B。Option 2
3。现有拥枪者应该定时，比如3个月一次，进行精神方面的检查，费用每次定为500元
，自付。
C。Option 3
4。既然在美国，拥有枪支是与生俱来的 Right，那么每个人就应该发一支 Machine
Gun。（看看结果如何？）
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
XOXO2012 (♂♀) 于 (Sun Dec 16 13:52:38 2012, 美东) 提到:
为什么这个话题在买卖提吵得闹翻了天？老刑付钱了？
☆─────────────... 阅读全帖 |
|
m******g
发帖数: 91 | 22 my env is: (anything wrong in it? Thx..................
[oracle@yw216 Disk1]$ env
PWD=/home/oracle/Disk1
ORACLE_SID=ora1
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
LDEMULATION=elf_i386_glibc21
TMPDIR=/home/oracle/tmp
XAUTHORITY=/home/oracle/.Xauthority
LC_MESSAGES=en_GB
HOSTNAME=yw216.quns.cam.ac.uk
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/u01/app/oracle/product/8.1.7/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib
NLSPATH=/usr/share/locale/%l/%N
GCC_EXEC_PREFIX=/usr/i386-glibc21-linux/lib/gcc-lib/
CLASSPATH=/u01/app/oracle/product/8.1.7/jdbc/lib/c |
|
P*C
发帖数: 6109 | 23
你上街很注意人家拿枪打你你怎么办，
遇到我没问题，遇到老黑,u01这种杂碎怎么办，去看电影的那帮人不小心啊？
让人家媳妇小心，你自己也小心点吧，另外经常记得刷牙，嘴太臭 |
|
k*******n
发帖数: 5546 | 24 【 以下文字转载自 GunsAndGears 讨论区 】
发信人: u01 (TheOne), 信区: GunsAndGears
标 题: 不立危墙，未雨绸缪
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Dec 14 17:54:01 2012, 美东)
随便说说，斑竹觉得不合适就删。
美国社会不是中国社会，不存在基于民族大团结的unified ethical standard，也不存
在基于强力政府的强力管理，甚至不存在足够长的历史。美国社会从一开始就是联邦制
。因此美国人特别擅长patch things up, 而不擅长未雨绸缪。如果出现局部混乱，在
美国必然是以族群和社区为利益中心抱团，短期内各家自扫门前雪。
所以拥枪只是手段，关键是在问题出现时，大家选择依靠自己，还是依靠政府？这也是
共和党和民主党主张的区别。
愿大家能更抱团，更合作，不要轻易落到那些无人在意的社会缝隙中去。 |
|
M*****n
发帖数: 16729 | 25 相当于NIH parent.
不晓得NIH有没有类似973的。可能P01， U01有点像吧。 |
|
|
P******3
发帖数: 244 | 27 success rate for new U01 in 2012 is 22.8%; R01 is 14.9%, R21 is 14.1%, R03
is 19.9%. |
|
R*******e
发帖数: 619 | 28 是不是只有超级牛人才能申请， 年轻AP基本没有分？ |
|
|
h*****w
发帖数: 8561 | 30 NIH 最近刚弄了个BIG DATA的UO1,每个800万的BUDGET,不是小虾能拿的到的. |
|
|
|
k********8
发帖数: 156 | 33 看了一下，不知道什么性质的研究可以申请。有申请过的牛牛来介绍一下不？ |
|
s******y
发帖数: 28562 | 34 我猜他可能说的是那种RFA 的R01 grant? 或者那些什么U01, P01?
我们平常见的这种non-solicited, self-initiated 的R01 grant， 的确是没有啥原因
就不能乱要钱的，连做老鼠的人，一般也就是乖乖的要个modular。除非要做人或者做
猴子的，才敢小心翼翼的多要一点。不过，我以前好像听说过一个说法是我们这种self
-initiated 的R01 grant其实不是NIH支出的大头。所以可能他说“大部分grant 不用
modular budget”可能是指那些其他grant吧？但是在我的印象中那些“其他grant”一
般都有比较浓厚的政治意味，不是我们一般人够得着的。
I
modular |
|
l********s
发帖数: 395 | 35 Beginning of Year 2, here are my "glorious" history as a junior PI:
R01, scored terribly 1 week ago
Another R01 like Proposal, rejected today
U01, scored 28 for the 1st time, don't know what will happen to the
resubmission, very scared and restless now.
Paper #1: rejected/resubmission request last October (prep for resubmission
next week)
Paper #2: rejected by BMC Medicine
Paper #3: rejected by NAR, waiting for Genome Biology response
Paper #4: submitted to Clin Cancer Res....
More rejections to... 阅读全帖 |
|
l***s
发帖数: 841 | 36 U01分数不错，应该能拿到吧。 Genome Biology投过一次，审稿慢的不得了。 花了快3
个月，最后还给据了。 从那以后，再没投过。不知道现在快点了吗？NAR从来都很快。
Bioinformatics现在审稿越来越慢了。最近的一篇花了7个多月才搞定。
resubmission |
|
l********s
发帖数: 395 | 37 Beginning of Year 2, here are my "glorious" history as a junior PI:
R01, scored terribly 1 week ago
Another R01 like Proposal, rejected today
U01, scored 28 for the 1st time, don't know what will happen to the
resubmission, very scared and restless now.
Paper #1: rejected/resubmission request last October (prep for resubmission
next week)
Paper #2: rejected by BMC Medicine
Paper #3: rejected by NAR, waiting for Genome Biology response
Paper #4: submitted to Clin Cancer Res....
More rejections to... 阅读全帖 |
|
l***s
发帖数: 841 | 38 U01分数不错，应该能拿到吧。 Genome Biology投过一次，审稿慢的不得了。 花了快3
个月，最后还给据了。 从那以后，再没投过。不知道现在快点了吗？NAR从来都很快。
Bioinformatics现在审稿越来越慢了。最近的一篇花了7个多月才搞定。
resubmission |
|
l********s
发帖数: 395 | 39 Yeah need more tolerance to failures.
I guess I had good luck to start with that well scored U01 so I had thought
too lightly. Naive.
hopeusw, can you exchange R43 writing tips? I have one coming with a company
but seems they just want me to do all the science and writing...thanks! |
|
l********s
发帖数: 395 | 40 U01 was the 1st grant I wrote within 1 month of starting the job...beginners
luck. It was not funded but they asked me to resubmit. The review will be
out April...so afraid now
快3 |
|
l********s
发帖数: 395 | 41 Some updates:
paper #1 is now under major revision in Mol. Human Reproduction
Paper #2 is now under major revision in Genome Biology
Perhaps things are going to turn to better directions.
I am praying everyday that my U01 will get funding in April...
resubmission |
|
l********s
发帖数: 395 | 42 One question is, if you are new PI getting a MPI grant with a senior
researcher, will you lose the new PI or early stage investigator status?
Another question is, if you get U01 as the PI, will you lose the new PI (
early stage investigator status for subsequent R01? |
|
f********y
发帖数: 119 | 43 co-PI 也算的。拿到了你的new investigator status 就没有了。R03/R21不算。 U01
不知道怎么算。 |
|
l********s
发帖数: 395 | 44 That is so unfair! I was told that U01 does not have bonus for New PI/ESI! |
|
l********s
发帖数: 395 | 45 what the heck is wrong with reviewers? first time 28, resubmission 30??? |
|
|
l***s
发帖数: 841 | 47 和PO哀求一下，看能不能fund A0 submission. 28还是不错的。 |
|
l********s
发帖数: 395 | 48 Begging :(
When I called the PO and introduce myself again, he said "I know..." |
|
F********h
发帖数: 346 | 49 自己顶一下，新AP很迷茫啊，怕给人当postdoc使了又实在是很想要这个机会。希望版
里的前辈能给点建议。 |
|
s*********x
发帖数: 1923 | 50
Yes, co-PI counts as PI and you will lose the New Investigator Status. |
|
