p******g
发帖数: 94 | 1 拿到绿卡几个月了，贴出来和大家分享一下，
我的case很弱，申的时候只有5paper，1篇影响因子7点几，别的都是1附近
另外重点是申请了很多刊物审稿，有些刊物会把你放到reviewer数据库里，这样尽管我
只审了2篇稿，但是我只提了我是十几家刊物的reviewer！
另外我也夹带了一点点私货，宣传了一下
自己工作之余做的网站，斑竹如果觉得不合适我改下，大家要是觉得有用，去facebook
like/share一下我的page（facebook.com/scienceprinting）感激不尽，当然要是能
在我网站上印点啥，不仅要热泪盈眶了。
(Please insert your letterhead.)
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Re: Second Preference National Interest Waiver Petition for Dr. (
scienceprinting.com)
Dear Sir/Madam:
I am writing this letter in support of Dr. (... 阅读全帖 |
|
h**l
发帖数: 4883 | 2 今天看到正确答案了。。。
Penalty for substantial understatement
You understate your tax if the tax shown on your return is less than the
correct tax. The understatement is substantial if it is more than the larger
of 10 percent of the correct tax or $5,000 for individuals. For
corporations, the understatement is considered substantial if the tax shown
on your return exceeds the lesser of 10 percent (or if greater, $10,000) or
$10,000,000.
You may avoid the substantial understatement penalty if you have subs... 阅读全帖 |
|
t***h
发帖数: 40 | 3 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin )
)
----------------------------------------------------------------)
APPELLANT’S... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 4 http://www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/article/0,,id=236664
The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), enacted in 2010 as part of
the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act, is an important
development in U.S. efforts to combat tax evasion by U.S. persons holding
investments in offshore accounts.
Under FATCA, certain U.S. taxpayers holding financial assets outside the
United States must report those assets to the IRS. In addition, FATCA will
require foreign financial institu... 阅读全帖 |
|
G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 5 【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: tshch (大丈夫), 信区: USANews
标 题: 这就是美国的法律
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Nov 19 02:57:27 2012, 美东)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin ... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***o
发帖数: 145 | 6 这是真人真事， 请大家舆论支持。
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin )
)
------------------------------------------------------------... 阅读全帖 |
|
t***h
发帖数: 40 | 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin )
)
----------------------------------------------------------------)
APPELLANT’S... 阅读全帖 |
|
t***h
发帖数: 40 | 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin )
)
----------------------------------------------------------------)
APPELLANT’S... 阅读全帖 |
|
t***h
发帖数: 40 | 9 这就是美国的司法： 腐败至及：
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin )
)
-------------------------------------------------------------... 阅读全帖 |
|
t***h
发帖数: 40 | 10 请教这是什麽美国政府？？？？
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin )
)
--------------------------------------------------------------... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 11 An ex-boyfriend turned up to question her narratives in a sworn affidavit
alleging that she was demonstrably neither aerophobic nor claustrophobic—
and perhaps far from being a novice in matters of taking lie-detector tests.
Instead, he suggested that she had used her psychotherapy skills to coach
her doppelganger friend how to massage such a test—a Zelig-like best friend
who unfortunately also turned up at the hearings, and may well have hosted
Ford before the Senate circus, and also allegedly ... 阅读全帖 |
|
o******s
发帖数: 2946 | 12 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: brihand (brihand), 信区: Military
标 题: IRS官方网站上关于FATCA的消息
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Dec 28 16:45:10 2011, 美东)
http://www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/article/0,,id=236664
The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), enacted in 2010 as part of
the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act, is an important
development in U.S. efforts to combat tax evasion by U.S. persons holding
investments in offshore accounts.
Under FATCA, certain U.S. taxpayers holding fina... 阅读全帖 |
|
s********1
发帖数: 1024 | 13 护照公证是需要的，W-7表的Instruction说得很清楚。当然，如果父母已经有了税号，
就不必再填W-7表申请了，也就不需要护照公证了。不过，既然楼主在问是否可以退税
，我认为楼主的父母应该是没有税号的。另外，就像楼上说的，本人必须是resident
alien 报税时才可以利用这个。
关于这个183天，你的公式是错的。前一年是算1/3，前二年（2008）是算1/6的。
节选自IRS website: http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc851.html
You are considered a resident alien if you met one of the following two
tests for the calendar year:
The first test is the "green card test." 。。。
The second test is the "substantial presence test". 。。。
To meet the substantial presence test, you must hav... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*********1
发帖数: 440 | 14 I think the key is whether the parents are "resident alien"
Under the residency rules of the Code, any alien who is not a RESIDENT ALIEN
is a NONRESIDENT ALIEN. An alien will become a RESIDENT ALIEN in one of
three ways:
1.
By being admitted to the United States as, or changing status to, a
Lawful Permanent Resident under the immigration laws (the Green Card Test);
2.
By passing the Substantial Presence Test (which is a numerical formula
which measures days of presence in the U... 阅读全帖 |
|
t***h
发帖数: 40 | 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin )
)
----------------------------------------------------------------)
APPELLANT’S... 阅读全帖 |
|
w***1
发帖数: 9 | 16 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: yecao (野草), 信区: Military
标 题: 看一看美国的司法腐败， 法官是怎样把一个无故孩子从妈妈身
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Nov 23 20:28:00 2012, 美东)
这是真人真事， 请大家舆论支持。
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
... 阅读全帖 |
|
B*****I
发帖数: 1378 | 17 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
tshch (大丈夫) 于 (Mon Nov 19 03:35:51 2012, 美东) 提到:
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin )
... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***o
发帖数: 145 | 18 请看这法律问件， 美国的法官是怎样腐败， 把孩子从妈妈身边强走的。请舆论只持。
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin )
)
-------------------------------------... 阅读全帖 |
|
y*****y
发帖数: 1208 | 19 Beida, i know you are hopeless. but again, here is one article by law
professor Heriot on the damaging side of affirmative action in college
admission. read it, moron.......
The Say Irony of Affirmative Action by Prof Gail Heriot
In 2003, the Supreme Court held that the University of Michigan's law school
could substantially relax its admissions standards in order to admit a "
critical mass" of African-American and Hispanic students. Many observers
interpreted that decision — Grut... 阅读全帖 |
|
y*****y
发帖数: 1208 | 20 Beida, i know you are hopeless. but again, here is one article by law
professor Heriot on the damaging side of affirmative action in college
admission. read it, moron.......
The Say Irony of Affirmative Action by Prof Gail Heriot
In 2003, the Supreme Court held that the University of Michigan's law school
could substantially relax its admissions standards in order to admit a "
critical mass" of African-American and Hispanic students. Many observers
interpreted that decision — Grut... 阅读全帖 |
|
L********r
发帖数: 758 | 21 下面的文章要读一读。
文章摘要如下：鸡头>凤尾原则是被广泛观察到的现象所支持的。同一入学新生，相比
于去与自己水平相当的大学，选择去比自己水平高很多的藤校是很不明智的。所以AA造
成对黑青年“毁人>诲人”。
如斯成立，则亚裔家长推自个的娃也须小心。如家长推了10年娃也没学会自推，那靠补
习班、凑活动经验上了藤校也是去给牛娃当分母做尾巴去了，也许不如去一州校帮助大
。学费省下来还可以投资给娃当个天使基金啥的。
发信人: yariguy (yari guy), 信区: Parenting
标 题: Re: Support Asian American students!!!
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jan 21 10:52:51 2013, 美东)
The Say Irony of Affirmative Action by Prof Gail Heriot
In 2003, the Supreme Court held that the University of Michigan's law school
could substantially relax its... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*****r
发帖数: 8227 | 22 The Near- and Longer-Term Prospects for the U.S. Economy
Good morning. As always, thanks are due to the Federal Reserve Bank of
Kansas City for organizing this conference. This year's topic, long-term
economic growth, is indeed pertinent--as has so often been the case at this
symposium in past years. In particular, the financial crisis and the
subsequent slow recovery have caused some to question whether the United
States, notwithstanding its long-term record of vigorous economic growth,
might n... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***n
发帖数: 2318 | 23 5 Principal Reasons Why I'm Still Short Tesla
Aug. 8, 2017 5:29 PM ET|
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4096526-5-principal-reasons-still-short-
tesla
Amit Ghate
Long/short equity, value
Summary
I review my long-standing TSLA short position.
Despite a large run-up in price, I find the reasons to be short the stock
more compelling than ever.
In particular, corporate governance, emerging competition, bloated
valuations and a slow change in sentiment toward the company may help
reverse the stock ru... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*******n
发帖数: 19 | 24 我家LD以J1身份2009年4月来美，同年11月拿到work permit工作，请问他是resident还
是non-resident？按照substantial presence test应该是resident. 但不知道受不受
excempt，因为substantial presence test中（1）写到看有不有tax treaty，我是J1
，因为有tax treaty，所以前三年都是nonresident，但是J2工作没有享受我的tax
treaty所以，他是不是不受这点排除；（2）substantial presence test中写到拿J签
证的teacher，trainee和student不能用substantial presence test。那么J2,过来工
作是research fellow，能不能按照substantial presence test来判断是不是resident
呢？ |
|
s*****g
发帖数: 26 | 25 再来阐述一下我的问题的背景：
根据以下link，儿女可以claim探亲父母是dependent，从而获得
Exemptions for Dependents
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p17/ch03.html#en_US_2010_publin
a) 首先，父母必须是qualifying relative
a1) Not a qualifying child test ---> 满足
a2) Member of household or relationship test ---> 满足
a3) Gross income test ---> 满足
a4) Support test ---> 满足
b) 另外还需要满足以下tests
b1) Dependent taxpayer test --> 满足，我不是其他任何人的dependent
b2) Joint return test --> 满足
b3) Citizen or resident test ---> 父母不是citizen, 所以必须是US resid... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*****g
发帖数: 26 | 26 再来阐述一下我的问题的背景：
根据以下link，儿女可以claim探亲父母是dependent，从而获得
Exemptions for Dependents
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p17/ch03.html#en_US_2010_publin
a) 首先，父母必须是qualifying relative
a1) Not a qualifying child test ---> 满足
a2) Member of household or relationship test ---> 满足
a3) Gross income test ---> 满足
a4) Support test ---> 满足
b) 另外还需要满足以下tests
b1) Dependent taxpayer test --> 满足，我不是其他任何人的dependent
b2) Joint return test --> 满足
b3) Citizen or resident test ---> 父母不是citizen, 所以必须是US resid... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*******a
发帖数: 65 | 27 http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc851.html
Topic 851 - Resident and Non-Resident Aliens
Since resident and nonresident aliens are taxed differently, it is important
for you to determine your status. You are considered a nonresident alien
for any period that you are neither a U. S. citizen nor a U. S. resident
alien.
You are considered a resident alien if you met one of the following two
tests
for the calendar year:
The first test is the "green card test". If at any time during the calendar
year you... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
m*****n
发帖数: 171 | 29 My company deducted my FICA (Social Security and Medicare Tax) for the whole
year 2013 when I transferred from F1 OPT to H1B. Then I start to check the
official IRS website for info about exemption. We all know as a resident
alien, we have to pay FICA. Quote from IRS website as follows:
"Resident aliens, in general, have the same liability for Social Security/
Medicare Taxes that U.S. Citizens have.
Nonresident aliens, in general, are also liable for Social Security/Medicare
Taxes on wages paid ... 阅读全帖 |
|
e********g
发帖数: 16 | 30 https://www.irs.gov/publications/p519/ch01.html#en_US_2015_publink1000222172
First-Year Choice If you
do not meet either the green card test or the substantial presence test for
2014 or 2015 and you did not choose to be treated as a resident for part of
2014, but you meet the substantial presence test for 2014, you can choose
to be treated as a U.S. resident for part of 2015. To make this choice, you
must:
but you meet the substantial presence ... 阅读全帖 |
|
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 31 一般人写这个，不过是照搬罢了。既然是基础问题，建议大家提问前，花几分钟google
一下。 对于你这个问题，我建议选一。
原因如下，1是指那基本三条，2是指某个著名的被uscis驳回的案例。
链接在下面，有空你读读好了。
1.In 1998, the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) issued a precedent
decision, Matter of In Re: New York State Department of Transportation, 22 I
&N Dec. 215 (Comm. 1998) (“NYSDOT”), which created a three-prong test for
petitioners seeking a national interest waiver. You should remember that the
purpose of these prongs is to set minimum requirements for activities that
are in the natio... 阅读全帖 |
|
c***p
发帖数: 1042 | 32 RFE 就是给了个模板
A. Documentation to establish that the beneficiary will continue to work in
their claimed area of expertise
It must be shown how the beneficiary will continue working in the United
States in the claimed area of expertise. The petition does not indicate that
the beneficiary has prearranged commitments for working in this field.
Please submit evidence that the beneficiary is coming to the United States
to continue work in the field. The work must be in the field in which the
beneficiar... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
|
|
y*****o
发帖数: 2364 | 37 April 3, 2016
USCIS
Attn: I-140
2501 S. State Highway 121 Business
Suite 400
Lewisville, TX 75067
RE: EB-1 Petition for Permanent Residency under the category of Alien of
Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner/Beneficiary: XXX YANG, Ph.D.
Classification Sought: 203(b)(1)(A)
Type of Petition: I-140
Dear Immigration Officer:
This letter is respectfully submitted in support of Dr. XXX Yang’s petition
for classification as a qualified immigrant under the first p... 阅读全帖 |
|
a********r
发帖数: 218 | 38 My case was approved in NSC after DIY NIW I-140 and RFE. I would like to
share my answers here, if you have more questions, please email to
d************[email protected]. Good luck for all I-140 applicants.
Eligibility for the requested waiver entails demonstrating that the national
interest would be adversely affected if a labor certification were required
. You must demonstrate that it would be contrary to the national interest to
potentially deprive the prospective employer of your services by mak... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*********g
发帖数: 975 | 39 大哥你贴完整点。 这些是指导review I-140 文件，不是法律。里面的东西全是教雇
员如何review 对应的 PERM LC。指导文件和实际操作会有区别。
总结一下：
首先 None of these reasons should automatically result in the petition
being denied; 大家可以放心，不会直接据你。
你列出来的三点：
(1) Overly Specific Job Offer
这是file PERM的大忌。没多少律师会犯这种错误 和I-140无关
(8) Beneficiary Overqualified
The beneficiary's education substantially over-qualifies him or her for the
job offered
substantially 是一个非常主观的词。你可以说一个PH.D.却去当厨师了，那就可以说
substantially. 一个master/Ph.D. 工程师去做 entry level engineer可以么？当然
可以了。是不是sub... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*******o
发帖数: 5387 | 40 【 以下文字转载自 Parenting 讨论区 】
发信人: LoanSeeker (Need Better Loan), 信区: Parenting
标 题: 爬藤的家长注意喽
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jan 21 16:04:05 2013, 美东)
下面的文章要读一读。
文章摘要如下：鸡头>凤尾原则是被广泛观察到的现象所支持的。同一入学新生，相比
于去与自己水平相当的大学，选择去比自己水平高很多的藤校是很不明智的。所以AA造
成对黑青年“毁人>诲人”。
如斯成立，则亚裔家长推自个的娃也须小心。如家长推了10年娃也没学会自推，那靠补
习班、凑活动经验上了藤校也是去给牛娃当分母做尾巴去了，也许不如去一州校帮助大
。学费省下来还可以投资给娃当个天使基金啥的。
发信人: yariguy (yari guy), 信区: Parenting
标 题: Re: Support Asian American students!!!
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jan 21 10:52:51 2013, 美东)
The Say Irony of Affirmativ... 阅读全帖 |
|
G*******s
发帖数: 4956 | 41 Blinded By Tradition:
An Open Letter to Dave Hunt
Regarding His Newly Published Attack Upon the Reformation, What Love Is This
? Calvinism's Misrepresentation of God
James White
Updated 5/16/02, see bottom of file
Dear Dave,
In the period of time since I finally received my own copy of your book (you
may recall I scanned through it while standing at your table in St. Louis a
t the PFO Conference) I have gone through a number of different emotions. A
t first I was just going to do one Dividing ... 阅读全帖 |
|
s**********8
发帖数: 25265 | 42 PMA
Premarket Approval (PMA)
Please note: As of October 1, 2002, FDA charges a fee for review of
Premarket Approvals1
Overview
When a PMA is Required
Devices Used in Blood Establishments
Data Requirements
References
Overview
Premarket approval (PMA) is the FDA process of scientific and regulatory
review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Class III medical devices
. Class III devices are those that support or sustain human life, are of
substantial importance in preventing impairment of... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****p
发帖数: 27354 | 43 我来看看你们的反应，看你们够不够有深度辨别力，请说说这个声明的优缺点和幕后故
事。
http://www.toxicology.org/ms/GM_Food.asp
The Safety of Genetically Modified Foods Produced through Biotechnology
Adopted by SOT September 25th, 2002
Executive Summary
The Society of Toxicology (SOT) is committed to protecting and enhancing
human, animal and environmental health through the sound application of the
fundamental principles of the science of toxicology. It is with this goal in
mind that the SOT defines here its current consensus position on ... 阅读全帖 |
|
R****a
发帖数: 6858 | 44
中国工业产值超美国26% 取代其成头号制造国
2013年09月04日10:49 来源：国际金融报 手机看新闻
打印网摘纠错商城分享推荐 字号
原标题：中国工业产值超美国26% 取代其成头号制造国
2007年6月以来工业产值比较（％）
●一个世纪以来，美国第一次失去了世界头号工业制造国的地位，让位给中国
●全球金融危机以来，中国工业产值翻了一番，而美国没有增长
●现在，中国的工业产值是美国的126%
目前在世的人们，一生从未经历过这样一件事——美国竟然不是世界工业的领头羊
。世界最新数据表明，中国已经取代美国，成为世界头号工业生产国，而且，是“远远
”超过。这结束了美国长达一个世纪在该领域的领袖历史，因此，清晰记录这其中究竟
发生了什么，并仔细分析它代表了中国经济发展的含义，具有重大意义。
联合国日前发布的数据显示，在金融危机前的2007年，中国工业生产总值只有美国
的62%，而到了2011年，中国工业生产总值就已经是美国的120%——2011年，中国工业
生产总值达2.9万亿美元，美国为2.4万亿美元。
联合国2012年数据目前尚未发布，所以笔者... 阅读全帖 |
|
J*V
发帖数: 3150 | 45 http://www.toxicology.org/ms/GM_Food.asp
The Safety of Genetically Modified Foods Produced through Biotechnology
Adopted by SOT September 25th, 2002
Executive Summary
The Society of Toxicology (SOT) is committed to protecting and enhancing
human, animal and environmental health through the sound application of the
fundamental principles of the science of toxicology. It is with this goal in
mind that the SOT defines here its current consensus position on the safety
of foods produced through biote... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 46 By Terence P. Jeffrey
December 14, 2011
Considering the debate around President Barack Obama's health care plan and
the lawsuits filed against it, then-Solicitor General Elena Kagan's written
answers to some of the 13 written questions relating to Obamacare that
Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans submitted to her during her Supreme
Court confirmation process were remarkably simple and straightforward.
"No," she said.
That was how she answered question No. 2, which inquired if she had eve... 阅读全帖 |
|
t*f
发帖数: 7 | 47 "分数按照IIHS的substantial better, better, average, worse, substantial worse
，依次为2， 1， 0，-1，-2。最后各车系的评分排列大家自己比较。"
I am not sure how meaningful this analysis is.
first of all, no one sane person buys a fleet of cars from a given maker. so
"averaging" doesn't make much sense.
2ndly, is "substantially better" twice as good as "better"? consider three
makers who produce two models each. Maker A's two models score "subtantially
better" and "substantially worse"; Maker B's two models "better" and "worse
", |
|
b****a
发帖数: 460 | 48 【 以下文字转载自 Law 讨论区 】
发信人: bbcvoa (An), 信区: Law
标 题: 非法销售ADODE PHOTOSHOP
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Nov 1 21:58:56 2012, 美东)
大家好，小弟在此请教大家一个问题。
前几天我在ebay上销售2份ADOBE PHOTOSHOP CS6 软件，价值350美元。该软件我是从
别处合法购买，由于不再需要，就挂在ebay上出售。
今天突然收到一份来自ADOBE代理律师的email警告信，要求我终止销售，还要在10天内
上缴1200美元罚款，否则就采取进一步法律行动。
现在的问题是我合法购买的软件在ebay上销售，觉得没有什么问题。我不知道是否应该
缴纳该罚款。如果不理它，我担心他们会给我的家里地址发正式的律师信。
在此请教大家如何处理，谢谢
Re: Sale of Counterfeit and/or Unauthorized Sale of Adobe. Software
Products
Dear XXX:
This firm is counsel to the Software & I... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
