|
l****z 发帖数: 29846 | 2 这个就是巴马政府的惯用手段了: 先给个好看的数字, 然后再把数字改成差的数字.
媒体不会报道第二个真实的数字. 普通老百姓基本不会看到
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/prod2.nr0.htm
Report on Productivity and Costs, Second Quarter 2016 by the BLS.
Due to a 4.7-percentage point downward revision to first-quarter hourly
compensation, unit labor costs decreased 0.2 percent in the first quarter of
2016, rather than increasing 4.5 percent as reported June 7. Real hourly
compensation decreased 0.4 percent after revision, rather than the
previously-published incre... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
o*******o 发帖数: 41 | 5 这个只能说明通胀率,用它来估计收入分布是很扯的。
1952年,92%这个bracket的收入是$250,001
按照1952年的统计(http://www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-015.pdf 第九页),这个bracket的人是0.4%,的确不到1%,但也绝对不是今天2000w的收入人群。
接近1%的是150,000的bracket,这个bracket的税率是90% (100,000就算这个bracket)
所以说,top 1%的税率在90%以上只少不多 |
|
|