a*****y
发帖数: 1488 | 1 internal proposal, 算种子基金，让你做点东西好申请 NSF。
一个问题是：With the proposed activity, what are the short- and long-term
benefits to the faculty member’s research program?
我想了一下：
short-term: adding one member to the program; produce results to compete
external funding; produce papers
long-term: ????
求指教。 |
|
d***y
发帖数: 8536 | 2 long term 申请federal grants?? |
|
a*****y
发帖数: 1488 | 3 多谢回复。不过一两年内的事情不算 long term 吧。 |
|
u***e
发帖数: 915 | 4 what options do you have if your fundings can not cover your full-time
salary?
teaching jobs, working for other PIs, or industry coding jobs?
share pls... |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 5 Yea, I wonder which one. I will only consider moving if the school is on
the west coast. I think I need another R01 to be attractive enough.
Although, he said that his school is 12 month hard money. I can tell you
some PIs are really dumb even the high achievement ones. I have to explain
to one of our new endow chairs that we are 50% soft money and what will
happen if he loses funding. |
|
f*******h
发帖数: 1269 | 6 OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL:
INTELLECTUAL MERIT:
+ Strengths
- Weaknesses
* Potentially transformative?
BROADER IMPACTS:
* Impacts on science and society:
* Integration of Research and Education and Broadening Participation:
* Postdoc Mentoring Plan (if applicable):
DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN, including dissemination of results:
COLLABORATION PLAN (required for 2 or more PIs):
RESULTS FROM PRIOR NSF SUPPORT (if applicable):
HUMAN SUBJECTS (if applicable):
BUDGET (if necessary):
ADDITIONAL SUGGESTIONS:
PA... 阅读全帖 |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 7 There are also PIs and institutions that have professional grant writers.
Once I have my some additional money, my next hire will be a grant writer
and semi-lab assistant. |
|
q****w
发帖数: 81 | 8 I have acknowledged the grants in all the articles. Some articles have the
grants listed but some others donot have. Thus, I cannot pool them into a
PDF report if the grants are not assigned to the articles.
NIH seems interested in bringing as many as possible troubles to the PIs.
Any ideas to fix the issue?
Thanks! |
|
p*l
发帖数: 1359 | 9 This was the 3rd reviewer. He was not required to give full comments, but he
did. His comment page start with: this is a resubmission from two junior co
-PIs.I had be criticized by my junior status before, but I thought the
junior status should not be treated as a main issue when judging a proposal.
The grant was a resubmission. It got an OK scored in the first round. The
resubmission may not worth funding, but it definitely does not deserve all 6
-7s.
|
|
p*l
发帖数: 1359 | 10 This was the 3rd reviewer. He was not required to give full comments, but he
did. His comment page start with: this is a resubmission from two junior co
-PIs.I had be criticized by my junior status before, but I thought the
junior status should not be treated as a main issue when judging a proposal.
The grant was a resubmission. It got an OK scored in the first round. The
resubmission may not worth funding, but it definitely does not deserve all 6
-7s.
|
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 11 I wrote a P01 grant as one of the PIs before joining the school, got it on
the 2nd year. Got my 1st R01 3 and half year in (submitted about 15 month
into AP and took a year to revise). |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 12 Only ten? I know nano and materials PIs doing 30 to 50 a year. A lot of
useless junk, but... |
|
o****i
发帖数: 142 | 13 做AP一年了，暑假是收获季节，也总结一下：
1. Publications: 只有一篇N作的paper 发表了，有几个revise & resubmit.
2. Grants: 投了5个grant proposals (4个大的，1个小的），1个Co-PI的NSF（$2M)
awarded, 还有一个 PI的collaborative NSF ($0.2M)recommended for award.
3. 这个夏天: 回国了一个月；参与投了5个federal grant proposals (2 Co-PIs,3 Co
-Is 打酱油的)；接下来把早该投出的paper 投出去；至少要休息一周准备开学。
4. 新学年：把paper 好好搞搞，两年内不做主力写proposal了。
现在100名左右的学校，搞social science。是否该考虑骑驴找马了？ |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 14 I haven't heard it. It is dumb. The older and bigger lab with money from
institute will kill new PIs especially when the money is so tight right now.
One R01 can only support the PI and two people max...
Also, it they give more money to certain states, politicians won't like it
at all. |
|
a******1
发帖数: 161 | 15 PI 估计是不可能的，看了NSF的详细brochure, 好像Co-PI都不让当，
[Faculty Level or Equivalent] Section IV, “Eligibility Information,”
states under “PI Limit” that “Principal Investigators (PI) must be at the
faculty level or equivalent.” How is “faculty level or equivalent” for
the Principal Investigators defined?
Principal Investigators (PI and co-PIs) must have a tenured, tenure-
track, or non-tenure track faculty position and their institution allows
them to serve as PI or co-PI. Postdoctoral researchers are n... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 16 NSF有规定只能有4个co-PI,其他人是senior personnel. 只要他budget里面把你那份算
上就行了.
NSF policy permits only one PI and a maximum of four Co-PIs on a proposal. |
|
s*********x
发帖数: 1923 | 17 The ability of giving a good talk is almost the same as writing a good paper
or proposal. We are NOT talking about language. Instead, we are talking
about how you organize your research topic, how to attract the audience,
whether you have the scientific vision.
I have seen many Chinese PIs give wonderful talks, although their English is
not perfect. |
|
f******g
发帖数: 1003 | 18 This criteria fits with most PIs around the world |
|
n*********9
发帖数: 954 | 19 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: newborn2009 (newborn2009), 信区: Military
标 题: New Mandatory Language Requirements for Foreign Nationals
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Nov 25 19:31:26 2014, 美东)
小将们看看08 的好政策，--只对有守法学历的，不对违法没学历的。
“Effective January 1, 2015, the government has mandated that J-1 visas
cannot be processed by sponsor institutions without quantitative proof of
English proficiency. Please see the attached policy and explanation of the
TOEFL exam requirements. You can forward this information to yo... 阅读全帖 |
|
l***y
发帖数: 4671 | 20 这个抱怨的家伙，看来也是刚拿了 tenure 有好几个 awards 而且被同事们看作
rising star 的，去年十月到十一月间，两个月交了 4 个 proposals。所以看起来也
不是只知道抱怨不知道埋头努力的人。甚至都属于胖老师说的拿走了大部分钱的 top
10% 的那些 PIs。 |
|
a**********y
发帖数: 2367 | 21 还有个问题，假如做的过程需要其他人技术上的帮助，可以有一定合作吗？可以pay其
他教授或者技术人员consultant fee吗？
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives - NSF recognizes that disciplinary
boundaries evolve with time and that inter-, multi-, trans-disciplinary
approaches are often needed to push the frontiers of research and education.
We invite proposals from early-career PIs that want to pursue research and
education activities that cross disciplinary boundaries. Increasingly,
CAREER proposals are co-reviewed between programs within a Division, a
D... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*******e
发帖数: 412 | 22 Faculty Positions Available
Department of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tsinghua University,
Beijing, China
The Department of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences is actively
seeking candidates for tenure track faculty positions at all levels. We seek
outstanding individuals to develop and conduct innovative basic and/or
translational research in areas of including but not limited to 1)
quantitative molecular and systems pharmacology, pharmacogenomics, drug
development sciences, ... 阅读全帖 |
|
E*****e
发帖数: 417 | 23 A very common and stupid comment for junior PIs. You might need to put more
preliminary data in it if you haven't got an independent paper out.
Sometimes that will not help either...
章；所有的文章都是和以前老板发的。这个人自己能干出什么样的研究？ |
|
s******l
发帖数: 125 | 24 You can check in the center whether other PIs have wet lab. If yes, you are
OK, if not, it could be a problem |
|
l****y
发帖数: 486 | 25 I should mention that, at least in NIH, there is very little restriction on
exactly which format you will need to use to write your proposal (except
that you need to follow the major format: Specific Aims, Significance,
Innovation etc). For example, there is no restriction on whether you should
list all your preliminary data separately or present the data along the way
when you propose the approach, whether you should discuss expected result/
pitfalls/alternative approaches separately or mix the... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****y
发帖数: 486 | 26 Many institutions have this kind of mock study sections.Usually it is free,
meaning the reviewers participating in the study section typically will not
get paid (unless your institution can allocate specific funds to support
this). Several ways to organize this:
one is to limit the number of proposals each PI can submit in each cycle or
each year, as some one already pointed out.
To motivate PIs to serve in this kind of study section, institution can
emphasize that serving in study section can b... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****y
发帖数: 486 | 27 Of course, no one wants to recruit a trouble maker. As I mentioned above,
Chair still needs to seek suggestions from other PIs. But for recruiting new
faculty, I still feel that Chair should take the major lead here. |
|
g**********0
发帖数: 30 | 28 星期一开组会时，老板说下星期来面试的一位印度博后很厉害，光是funding就有快200
万。我们都自叹不如。今天小蜜发了他的CV。 我看了一下，是NIH和NSF的co-PIs。我
好奇google了一下，发现，NIH是他博后老板的Career Development Award，是在他博
士毕业前就申请到的。我想他是现在做他的课题吧，请问各位Faculty如果是这样的话
， 在CV可以说是CO-PI吗？ Career Development Awards 有Co-PI吗？
还有，NSF的项目没有他的名字，而且是在他博士期间的项目。请问博士生可以作为NSF
项目的Co-PI吗？ |
|
l***9
发帖数: 360 | 29 600 sq ft maybe a bit small? Mine is 1,000 sq ft and still feel crowded.
Ask for
the average space of other PIs in the department first? |
|
E*****e
发帖数: 417 | 30 My 2 cents:
1. The earlier, the better in most cases.
2. It is fine to contact multiple PIs at the same time but be specific about
your future research in his/her lab. |
|
E*****e
发帖数: 417 | 31 In your email, you can state what type of projects you are interested while
of course keeping certain flexibility. Most PIs like a well-thought-out plan
from postdoc applicants. Good luck.
他们组里的研究方向吗？还是面试的时候再当面讨论？ |
|
A***a
发帖数: 73 | 32 For a rejected proposal with a good score or comments, my guess is:
1) You have a good chance to get support if you address the comments
carefully. Talk with the PM to ask for some suggestions. If he is quite
positive and suggests you to revise and resubmit, your chance will be very
good.
Usually, at least one reviewer feels that your proposal is well written.
The other two reviewers may feel that your proposal has some potential but
it is not good enough for them to give you HC (highly compe... 阅读全帖 |
|
o****e
发帖数: 72 | 33 I guess most trainees only care : (1) those who help their trainee find jobs
. (2) those who do not or can not help their trainees find jobs.
Luckily, both my Ph.D and postdoc PIs belong to the first type. |
|
s*********x
发帖数: 1923 | 34 Sadly, scenario 2 happens a lot more than you expected. I have heard
multiple PIs complained about it. |
|
l****y
发帖数: 486 | 35 知道你喜欢诋毁这一行，但说句你不爱听的，极少会有PI会釆取你的建议。
最现实可行的是，PI自己招人要谨慎，（胖老师的几条建议很好）。学生自己也要想清
楚，如果认为这一行没前途，就不要出来做博后。但总有一些稀里糊涂，不淸不楚的（
including both PIs and postdocs)，那就让这些人做炮灰去好了.总的来说，PI做炮
灰的可能性小很多，因为手下只要有少数人work out 就够了（楼主既便在这儿埋怨，
他手下好歹有几个可以的，这就够了），他有什么incentive去照你的建议去做？ |
|
C***t
发帖数: 915 | 36 1. Practically, if we need to frequently write proposals and papers, it's
critical to follow the latest studies in the field. We don't have to read
the whole article, but should be familiar with the methods and results. Only
those highly established PIs like 11G, who obtain their funding through
different sources or have subordinates manage their research progress, can
have the leisure not to keep up with the literature.
2. If one truly cares about science, he/she would want to know what's going... 阅读全帖 |
|
H****N
发帖数: 997 | 37 To me, the sole most important indicator is where the past trainees in the
lab have ended up. If most of them did not become PIs, your chances of
becoming a faculty would be very low, no matter what. In addition, don't go
to a lab that takes 5-10 year to publish a paper. That is way too long. |
|
z***t
发帖数: 2374 | 38 做实验和分析都很重要
所以近些年涌现出不少厉害PIs
他们都是数学或物理出身，然后又转生物
这样两个方向都非常强 |
|
E*****e
发帖数: 417 | 39 选择这份工的代价，大多数PIs都有一抽屉悲剧的proposals。 |
|
w***o
发帖数: 151 | 40 I am thinking of
1PI
40-50%
4 Co-PIs
1) 20/15 helping writing the grant/and getting 2 collaborators
2) 20/15 department chair, helps coordination
3) 10 only for his part
$) 10/5 collaborator of #1 co-PI, do not do much
the |
|
A***a
发帖数: 73 | 41 When we review the applicant’s CV, we consider the following aspects:
1。你的毕业学校好于申请学校。至少同一档次。Otherwise, unless you are an
experienced AP with good research and funding records, you have little
chance to be considered. Are you from a leading research group? Is your
advisor famous?
2。文章quantity and quality 满足基本要求。very important. You need to have
at least 3~5 first authored papers published in top journals in your area
for a fresh phd。If you have GOOGLE CITATION REPORT showing that most of
your pap... 阅读全帖 |
|
c**********e
发帖数: 143 | 42 你看看以下回答满意吗
Why you are interested in our department?
1. You have very strong XXX research environment. And many PIs in your
departments are interested in XXX and these are my interest too. In addition
, I found you department has good collaboration with researchers in other
departments, campus and institutes. Moreover, you have a great XXXX research
center. I believe I can easily perform my research and find good
collaboration there. Thus, I think these excellent research and
collaborative ... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*******k
发帖数: 63 | 43 I think it depends on different PIs. My boss always agrees to give H1B, he
never asks to give J visa instead. |
|
e*****e
发帖数: 283 | 44 去年十二月投的NSF SBE某小项目 非CAREER。3月25号panel review. 3月28号status
date和PO都变了。今天实在忍不住了 发信问了PO。得到以下回复：
"Most PIs will hear something from us within the next couple weeks."
各位大侠，这种panel后立刻换PO是啥意思啊？ |
|
f****d
发帖数: 105 | 45 不share proposal 给PIs , 基本就给这个合作定调了。 |
|
f****d
发帖数: 105 | 46 不share proposal 给PIs , 基本就给这个合作定调了。 |
|
u*****s
发帖数: 172 | 47 我和老美同事一起拿了个项目。只能fund一个学生。当然就co-advise了。那个学生一
半时间做这个项目，同时拓展一个我们两个PIs都感兴趣的项目。
之前我们说好这个学生做的事情应该是我们两个人都想做的，funding也一起申请。文
章都是两个通讯作者。
现在这个co-advise的学生是我几个学生里面做的最好的。 |
|
n**********o
发帖数: 1016 | 48 No, PM is not allowed to discuss any pending proposal with PIs. |
|
n**********o
发帖数: 1016 | 49 No, PM is not allowed to discuss any pending proposal with PIs. |
|
p**********n
发帖数: 1470 | 50 in my opinion, NIH is a lot better than NSF in many ways, but most
importantly, NIH prefers more prelim results, while NSF doesn't like too
many (many proposals got killed because PIs present too many results and it
looks like everything has been done already; this does not happen with NIH i
heard). |
|
