b***e
发帖数: 1419 | 1 Not sure about other areas, but ICALP is a rather low conf.
in programming languages. I reviewed a PL paper for ICALP 05
last month. |
|
r****c
发帖数: 2585 | 2 How about ranking of Icalp? good? |
|
l*********g
发帖数: 17 | 3 ICALP'05 (Track B) notification |
|
r****c
发帖数: 2585 | 4 Do not worry, I know someone got rejected by ICALP but go to SODA.
hoho |
|
l***i
发帖数: 632 | 5 stoc focs soda icalp ccc esa random approx etc...
我们审稿都可以看到作者是谁的... |
|
c****i
发帖数: 420 | 6 异端！竟然把icalp放到ccc前面！
的话
盲， |
|
c****i
发帖数: 420 | 7 又胡扯，別的我不清楚，信息口那些事我可以說非常清楚了。
會議有屁用，icalp best paper都申不上。 |
|
s*****g
发帖数: 5159 | 8 老板博士的时候是做并行计算的，他讨厌那个领域的人牛逼轰轰的样子，毕业以后自立
门户改作算法，靠着抱粗腿也取得了一定成就，包括若干FOCS/STOC/SODA/JACM的文章
，之所以说他抱粗腿，是因为这些文章里没有和学生一起发的，和学生发的文章最好的
也就是PODC/ICALP。
昨天听师弟说他老人家得了今年的Dijkstra Prize，这是并行计算领域的最高奖了，靠
的是他老人家和他师姐当年发的一片据说影响力很大的文章。我发信祝贺的时候，他老
人家说已经不记得那片文章具体说的什么了...运气来了，躺着也中枪。
没包子，非要去找我老板要，注意他不吃猪肉... |
|
h****t
发帖数: 93 | 9 ICALP, seems second tier |
|
l*****g
发帖数: 49 | 10
General conferences:
first tier: STOC and FOCS
second tier: SODA, ICALP
others: ESA, ISAAC, STACS, COCOON, FSTTCS
other more specific conference:
SoCG for computational geometry
SPAA for parallel algorithms
IPCO for combinatorial optimization
RANDOM for randomized techniques
APPROX for approximation algorithms
then there are other conferences for computational complexity:
CCC: computational complexity
CRYPTO: cryptography |
|
y***s
发帖数: 294 | 11 不好意思，想问一个在行家里手看来可能有点投机取巧的问题。
我以前学过一段时间theory，不讨厌，学也能学，只是觉得这一行并不是
最能发挥自己兴趣和优势的，所以就转行做了别的。其实我现在写的每一
篇paper，都不会忘记来点各式各样的证明，e.g. NP-hardness/approximability/
inapproximability, etc. 有的paper干脆就是纯证明，一点实验都没有的。
但是我投的全都是system领域的会议。
最近考虑一个问题，就是如何让自己的CV看起来尽可能与众不同。我想了
一个点子，就是以第一作者甚至唯一作者的身份在比较decent的theory会议
或者期刊上发表一篇文章。如果STOC/FOCS太难，SIAM SODA/SIAM Journal
on Computing/ICALP/ESA/Journal of Algorithms之类的够不够decent？
还有什么别的会议/期刊吗？希望审稿期越短越好。
关于文章的内容上，现在手头有一个题目，是一个在system领域有相当
fundamental的重要性的问题。我已经把theory问题定义清楚了 |
|
y***u
发帖数: 101 | 12 theory/algorithms会议的politics相对少一些, 不过如果问题不是well known
的话主要看technique本身是不是interesting和nontrivial. 可以找一个教授
帮你看看再作建议吧,你提到的conf/journal都不错.
当然stoc/focs/sicomp是最牛的, soda其次,然后是icalp, esa等
single-authored paper很酷. |
|
w******T
发帖数: 71 | 13 Does any one get notification of ICALP05?
thanks |
|
r****c
发帖数: 2585 | 14 hoho
it should be later in recent days |
|
|
w******T
发帖数: 71 | 16 until Now, I have not.
your notification is from Tract A? |
|
|
h****t
发帖数: 93 | 18 i think second tier in algorithm, theory, fundations |
|
r****c
发帖数: 2585 | 19 Compare with ESA? STACS? |
|
h****t
发帖数: 93 | 20 comparing with STOC, SODA, FOCS |
|
r****c
发帖数: 2585 | 21 I still think FOCS > STOC > SODA |
|
w******T
发帖数: 71 | 22 I got the notification (Track A), which is a bad message.
wuwu.... |
|
d*******g
发帖数: 36 | 23
I think there are lots of good conferences for your paper depending on your
concentration: algorithms or applications.
If your result has good theoretical contributions, then recomb and wabi are
good choices. Of course, FOCS, STOC and SODA, ICALP, ESA, STACS,MFCS, CPM,
ISAAC… all are good ones and they have sessions for computational biology.
If your paper is a little bit less in theoretical contribution, then your
focus is application and you can try ISMB,ECCB, CIBCB, BIBE,PSB, CSB, … all
of t |
|
|
|
