z*******h
发帖数: 346 | 1 https://www.cprogramming.com/c++11/rvalue-references-and-move-semantics-in-c
++11.html
vector变量是allocate在stack上，但是里面的东西是allocate在heap上，这样move
semantics就allocate一个新的vector object(里面就装size和一个pointer，不费内存
），但是C++11就不在heap上重新为vector里面的东西allocate memory了，它就偷偷地
把rvalue vector里面的pointer偷过来。
你的vector里面装的是指针，那么这些指针们allocate在heap上，每个再指向那些heap
上的pole们。我觉得你直接在vector里装pole不更省事吗？ |
|
l******t
发帖数: 2113 | 2
有两种情况，一种是ED allocation out of dealer's allocations, 比如M235i这种新
车型和4系刚出来的时候，这种情况通常dealer不愿意折扣太多，所以基本是ED MSRP或
者多少$off ED MSRP
另外一种就是单独的ED allocation，不从dealer allocation里面出，这种基本就是从
ED invoice+$500到$1500。4系大概6个多月以后就没有从dealer allocation里面出了
，所以基本就是从invoice往上谈。 |
|
l******t
发帖数: 2113 | 3
有两种情况，一种是ED allocation out of dealer's allocations, 比如M235i这种新
车型和4系刚出来的时候，这种情况通常dealer不愿意折扣太多，所以基本是ED MSRP或
者多少$off ED MSRP
另外一种就是单独的ED allocation，不从dealer allocation里面出，这种基本就是从
ED invoice+$500到$1500。4系大概6个多月以后就没有从dealer allocation里面出了
，所以基本就是从invoice往上谈。 |
|
c***s
发帖数: 70028 | 4 前总统马英九今天表示，常设仲裁法院认定太平岛是礁不是岛，他非常错愕与愤怒，绝不接受荒谬不公的国际仲裁，他呼吁政府立即提出具体措施，捍卫中华民国的太平岛。
马英九指出，这个法庭的存在，应该是为国际争端定纷息争、避免走上冲突甚至战争。但是，这样的仲裁结果，不但没有排难解纷，反而增加了冲突的可能。「在背後操控的势力，看似赢了面子，其实却输了裡子。」
「菲律宾对中国」南海仲裁案，常设仲裁法院今天公布结果，称中国大陆在9段线范围内主张的历史权利没有法律依据，而南沙群岛的所有海上地物，均为礁岩，包括太平岛在内。
马英九晚间在脸书发文表示，从去年12月到今年5月，包括他在内，150多名部会首长、国内外学者专家和国内外媒体，都访问太平岛，亲眼见证这个淡水充裕（南沙唯一）、农产丰富、生活机能完整的岛屿，完全符合「联合国海洋法公约」第121条关于「岛屿」必须「维持人类生存与自身经济生活」的要件。
他说，至今年4月底为止，也有430篇国际媒体完整陈述「太平岛是岛」的事实。太平岛是「岛」不是「礁」，已是国内外多数人的共识。
马英九指出，70年来，太平岛是在中华民国有效统治之下，对地区提供医疗救难等服务，夙有口... 阅读全帖 |
|
y*z
发帖数: 3244 | 5 The Hague, 12 July 2016
The Tribunal Renders Its Award
A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under
Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (the “
Convention”) in the arbitration instituted by the Republic of the
Philippines against the People’s Republic of China.
This arbitration concerned the role of historic rights and the source of
maritime entitlements in the South China Sea, the status of certain maritime
features and the maritime enti... 阅读全帖 |
|
C****U
发帖数: 994 | 6 (非正式翻译)
南海仲裁案
(菲律宾共和国 v. 中华人民共和国)
海牙，2016年7月12日
仲裁庭发布裁决
今日，根据《联合国海洋法公约》(“《公约》”)附件七组成的仲裁庭就菲律宾共和国
对中华人民共和国提起的仲裁案作出了一致裁决。
该仲裁案涉及在南海的历史性权利的作用和海洋权利的渊源、某些岛礁的地位及其能够
产生的海洋权利，以及菲律宾声称违反了《公约》的中国某些行为的合法性问题。考虑
到《公约》对强制争端解决的限制性规定，仲裁庭强调，它既不对任何涉及陆地领土主
权的问题进行裁决，也不划定当事双方之间的任何边界。
中国反复申明“其不接受、不参与由菲律宾单方面提起的仲裁”。然而，《公约》附件
七规定，“争端一方缺席或不对案件进行辩护，应不妨碍程序的进行”。附件七同时规
定，在争端一方不参与程序的情况下，仲裁庭“必须不但查明对该争端确有管辖权，而
且查明所提要求在事实上和法庭上均确有根据”。因此，在整个程序中，仲裁庭采取了
一些步骤验证菲律宾诉求的正确性，包括要求菲律宾提交进一步的书面论证，在两次庭
审之前及庭审过程中对菲律宾进行询问，指定独立的专家就技术性问题向仲裁庭报告，
以及获取... 阅读全帖 |
|
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 7 Speaking exclusively to Breitbart News, political polling pioneer Pat
Caddell said the Reuters news service was guilty of an unprecedented act of
professional malpractice after it announced Friday it has dropped the “
Neither” option from their presidential campaign tracking polls and then
went back and reconfigured previously released polls to present different
results with a reinterpretation of the “Neither” responses in those polls.
“This comes as close as I have ever seen to cooking the resu... 阅读全帖 |
|
x*b
发帖数: 5723 | 8 这个月全美的dealer都有Dealer Demo for Macan，我约了今天下午去的Fremont
Porsche。首先还是要赞一下服务态度，可能是因为weekday没什么人，车一早就准备好
了，配置应该至少算中配了，有我必配的大部分Option了，包括不多见的21" wheels所
以也正好感受一下是否会太颠，但是美中不足的是没有Air suspension，所以只能感受
标准车高下的情况了。
先从内饰/空间说起：
走的标准的Porsche风格，做工精良，用料明显比BBA同级车高一档，这个就不多说了。
但是要大赞一下新款的方向盘，918上搬下来的，无论是手感还是Shape都绝佳，我个人
觉得比我所有试过的BMW的或Porsche之前款的方向盘手感都要好，包括好评不断的F30
的M-Sport方向盘。
其次是坐姿，我个人没有感觉到和X3 M-Sport明显的差别，可能是没有air suspension
所以车高固定的情况下座椅高度相差不明显，但是根据网上的数据如果有Air
suspension车身最低的时候座椅高度应该能比X3低近10厘米。不过座椅包裹性依旧的
好，即使不是最好的... 阅读全帖 |
|
s******d
发帖数: 323 | 9 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
nihuai (DULM) 于 (Tue Dec 12 12:56:19 2006) 提到:
又到午休时间。今天聊聊rebalancing. 很多投资股票多年的朋友都没听说过这个概念
。guru们也不常用这个骗人。
谈rebalancing, 不得不先说asset allocation.
financial planning的一个很重要的部分就是asset allocation based on individual
's appetite and ability to
take risk, 概念可大可下。不理解asset allocation, 是很难了解active management
的问题，也就无从理解
passive investment style using index fund的真正优点。
什么是asset allocation? 核心观点就是表现好的asset每年都不同而且很难预见。／
／废话！所以有个组合的话更
有可能达到你的目标。更重要的是不同的asset可以提供non-c |
|
O*********9
发帖数: 48 | 10 "For your 401k lineup, I think PTTRX is good although it may be a little too
big, Dodge & Cox made inexcusable mistakes in 2008 and thanks god I had
never invested with them, Thornburg is very fine shop but Thornburg
International Equity seems to be a privately offering make it difficult to
judge. So all index portfolio in 401k looks good, or using PTTRX for bond
portion. Finally, you could take the best in your 401k plan and leave the
rest to your taxable and IRA, as long as the total allocatio... 阅读全帖 |
|
t*m
发帖数: 4414 | 11 几个月前用空做了一个simulation, 假设投资15, 14, 13, 12, 11, or 10年至今。
starting allocation: 20% VBTLX; 80% VFIAX
Scenarios:
1. never rebalance
2. rebalance every 6 months
3. rebalance every 12 months
4. rebalance when allocation is 3% of my target (20/80)
5. rebalance when allocation is 5% of my target (20/80)
6. rebalance when allocation is 10% of my target (20/80)
最后结果，各个scenario 之最终的收益，几乎没有差别。
结论，
(1) rebalance 没有什么大用。
(2) rebalance 也没有什么大坏处。
（我假设钱在IRA里，没有考虑税的问题。） |
|
D*****t
发帖数: 558 | 12 looks pretty good to me. Whether or not 涨得慢但稳健 is not important when
considering asset allocation. diversification and non-correlation among
asset are two criteria you should consider.
just wondering why you have two sector ETFs in the portfolio. A bit unusual.
. but really nothing wrong with it, as long as you have a reason to
overweight these sectors.
20% bond allocation implies a very long investment time horizon, at least 15
-20 yrs, if not longer, IMO. rule of thumb goes that your bond allo... 阅读全帖 |
|
H******o
发帖数: 30 | 13 刚收到的基金理财建议，据说收益还不错！no-brainer！
Allocations for Conservative Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 17.40%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 17.80%
ARTISAN MID CAP 9.20%
VANG SM GR IDX INST 6.90%
RUSSELL INTL GROWTH 5.55%
RUSSELL INTL VALUE 5.20%
PIMCO TOTAL RETURN 15.17%
VANG ST BD IDX IS PL 22.78%
Total 100.00%
Allocations for Aggressive Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 25.27%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 27.48%
ARTISAN MID CAP 12.04%
VANG SM GR ID... 阅读全帖 |
|
H******o
发帖数: 30 | 14 刚收到的基金理财建议，据说收益还不错！no-brainer！
Allocations for Conservative Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 19.40%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 17.80%
ARTISAN MID CAP 8.30%
VANG SM GR IDX INST 6.90%
RUSSELL INTL GROWTH 4.00%
RUSSELL INTL VALUE 5.20%
PIMCO TOTAL RETURN 15.62%
VANG ST BD IDX IS PL 22.78%
Total 100.00%
Allocations for Aggressive Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 25.27%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 30.67%
ARTISAN MID CAP 11.98%
VANG SM GR ID... 阅读全帖 |
|
H******o
发帖数: 30 | 15 Allocations for Conservative Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 19.40%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 17.10%
ARTISAN MID CAP 6.40%
VANG SM GR IDX INST 6.90%
RUSSELL INTL GROWTH 4.00%
RUSSELL INTL VALUE 4.10%
PIMCO TOTAL RETURN 19.32%
VANG ST BD IDX IS PL 22.78%
Total 100.00%
Allocations for Aggressive Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 26.31%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 30.67%
ARTISAN MID CAP 11.98%
VANG SM GR IDX INST 11.18%
RUSSELL INTL G... 阅读全帖 |
|
H******o
发帖数: 30 | 16 Allocations for Conservative Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 17.60%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 18.70%
ARTISAN MID CAP 6.40%
VANG SM GR IDX INST 8.00%
RUSSELL INTL GROWTH 6.00%
RUSSELL INTL VALUE 4.10%
PIMCO TOTAL RETURN 19.32%
VANG ST BD IDX IS PL 19.88%
Total 100.00%
Allocations for Aggressive Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 26.31%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 29.53%
ARTISAN MID CAP 11.98%
VANG SM GR IDX INST 11.18%
RUSSELL INTL G... 阅读全帖 |
|
H******o
发帖数: 30 | 17 Allocations for Conservative Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 13.00%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 18.70%
ARTISAN MID CAP 6.40%
VANG SM GR IDX INST 11.30%
RUSSELL INTL GROWTH 6.00%
RUSSELL INTL VALUE 4.70%
PIMCO TOTAL RETURN 19.00%
VANG ST BD IDX IS PL 20.90%
Total 100.00%
Allocations for Aggressive Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 26.31%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 22.03%
ARTISAN MID CAP 19.14%
VANG SM GR IDX INST 11.18%
RUSSELL INTL ... 阅读全帖 |
|
H******o
发帖数: 30 | 18 Allocations for Conservative Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 13.00%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 15.60%
ARTISAN MID CAP 9.50%
VANG SM GR IDX INST 11.30%
RUSSELL INTL GROWTH 7.80%
RUSSELL INTL VALUE 4.70%
PIMCO TOTAL RETURN 15.60%
VANG ST BD IDX IS PL 22.50%
Total 100.00%
Allocations for Aggressive Strategy
Fund Name Allocation
VAN VAL INDEX INST 22.24%
VANG INST INDEX PLUS 22.03%
ARTISAN MID CAP 19.14%
VANG SM GR IDX INST 13.17%
RUSSELL INTL ... 阅读全帖 |
|
G***n
发帖数: 877 | 19 Hi,
I have a question using C. I want to
allocate the memory using realloc() or
malloc() inside a function fun(), the
return of this function is the pointer
pointing to the allocated memory. There
is no free() inside fun()， because I
need to grasp the allocated memory in
fun() by its return.
In the main function, I define char
*pStr= fun() to call this function and
then try to free pStr later using
free(pStr). The program runs forever at
free(pStr) there. However, if I do not
use free() function... 阅读全帖 |
|
r*******n
发帖数: 3020 | 20 Problem Statement
You have been given a list of jewelry items that must be split
amongst two people: Frank and Bob. Frank likes very expensive jewelry. Bob
doesn't care how expensive the jewelry is, as long as he gets a lot of
jewelry. Based on these criteria you have devised the following policy:
* 1) Each piece of jewelry given to Frank must be valued greater than or
equal to each piece of jewelry given to Bob. In other words, Frank's least
expensive piece of jewelry must be valued... 阅读全帖 |
|
a******u
发帖数: 239 | 21 I think my answers to Question 7 and 8 are correct, but they said they are
not correct, why?
I already tested the code by Visual C++ (c compiler).
Thank you very much.
Line in file Contents
30 int * someIDs, theFirst, *r;
110 someIDs =GetSomeIDs(); /* defined below */
111 theFirst = someIDs [0];
112 r= ReorderIDs(someIDs);
113-150 /* we want to use ‘theFirst’ and ‘r’ here*/
499 /*-------- GetSomeIDs-----*/
500 int * GetSomeIDs()
501 {
502 int ids[8];
503-5... 阅读全帖 |
|
j******s
发帖数: 48 | 22 好吧，自己回答一下思路，虚心求各路大神拍，给点意见
第一题应该是建立一个binary tree,然后recursive求每一个节点的左右子树的最高高
度,他们和就是在这一位上的largest distance，可以online做，但是需要在每个节点
保存左右子树的高度并且动态更新。
o(n) time + O(n) space
第二题,
Assumption:
1 Log file is typically very small, operations are append, delete and read.
2 Cluster is built on Hadoop, which has a chunk size of 64MB, roughly, and
it might be too large and inefficient if we use this chunk size for the log
file.
3 Log information is typically not very important, less effort is needed for
redundan... 阅读全帖 |
|
W******e
发帖数: 3319 | 23 1. Introduction
My interest in studying creativity was inspired by the frustrations that I
felt as a student, then as a professor. I wanted to know how I could
encourage creativity in myself, my students, and my colleagues.
Politicians, industrial managers, academic administrators, and other leaders
often say that innovation is critical to the future of civilization, our
country, their company, etc. But in practice, these same people often act as
if innovation is an evil that must be suppressed,... 阅读全帖 |
|
t******l
发帖数: 10908 | 24 这个话题还是最近不多见的新话题，而且也很实际，虽然楼主的具体
案例稍微极端一些。
引申开去的话，除了 financial allocation 和 placement 的问题，
还有 minimal expectation on effort & achievement 的问题。
我个人的看法，我觉得 “机会均等” 里面很多归上帝管。所以现实的说，
我多半是选择在初教和中教阶段，自家两娃的 financial allocation
和 human-hour allocation 都是 per-capita-based。而在高教阶段
则是 need-based。
minimal expectation 方面。我觉得对于 minimal expectation on
effort，我个人觉得应该对两娃是 equal 的（相对于 age 或 年级），
这个也 inline with per-capita-based financial & human-hour
allocation。而对于 minimal expectation on achievements，
我个人觉得 justify ... 阅读全帖 |
|
D*w
发帖数: 1011 | 25 发信人: ManOf35 (stocktrader), 信区: Stock
标 题: 一个业余交易员的无限期封刀留言
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jul 22 03:34:56 2007)
也不怕大家笑话，我就是那个放空AMZN后哭了的猥琐男。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/19773192_3.html
不记得是那个诗人说过的，一根经验的荆棘，抵得上忠告的茫茫草原。失败不是失落，
失落的感觉是无力留住一抹红，而失败使人变得更聪明。
也许是天意，在重击后，我似乎对卷土重来失去了兴趣。之后不久我开始了寻找新的工
作。明天我就要开始在新公司上班，按照公司的政策，我已经关闭了所有股票帐户，在
一年半几乎是全职交易之后，我可能不得不向股票交易说白白了，这个曾经让我欢喜让
我忧的地方。种瓜得豆，我面试中相当多的问题都与金融相关，我回答起来亦是得心应
手。
我写这些留言的目的，一是贻笑大方，抛砖引玉；二是让刚出道的人少交点学费。你是
鳄鱼，我是狐狸。我挣不到你的，你也休想从我这儿划走一分钱。我所写得这些东西，
基本上都是关于短线操作的，不要误... 阅读全帖 |
|
p******e
发帖数: 17163 | 26 对于不赌钱的投资者，个人认为，未来三个月的portfolio allocation,下列组合应该
很不错
BUY the following combo.
GLD, SH, IEF.
equallly weighted
刚刚翻旧帖，我在今年1/15推荐过这三个，看了三个的平均回报，假设你三个花钱买的
一样多的话是0%。 但是我认为这三个combo同时买应该在未来三至六个月有相当可观的
回报，当然，你不能拿这跟赌钱或者买垃圾股的比，这只是给老实人的401k的
allocation的建议。
具体原因太长了，我就不写了，但这三个combo的呼吁者分别如下
-买gld,推荐者，中国大妈
-买sh,亦即等同于抛售大盘，推荐者我
-买ief,即买中期国债，推荐者，债王bill gross
在我一月份推荐这三剑客的时候，中国大妈，我，以及bill gross, 都被人冷嘲热讽。
我自不用说，本论坛神憎鬼厌，中国大妈排队买金也被人当笑话看，就连过往记录不错
的债王都被人说江郎才尽。
在看现在，债王已经被vindicate了，黄金基本与一月份持平，就是我比较不争气一点
，大盘还没跌多少。
但是我仍然继续... 阅读全帖 |
|
d******8
发帖数: 1972 | 27 非常感谢onceaweek的回答，但我还是不知道怎么选？不知道那个与指数最密切，附上
VOYA可选
的投资：
006 Voya Long-Term Guaranteed Accumulation Account
003 Voya Money Market Portfolio - Class I
005 Guaranteed Accumulation Account (GAA)
Bonds
1001 American Century Investments® Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund -
Investor Class
1003 American Funds The Bond Fund of AmericaSM - Class R-4
7576 Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund - Class M Shares
6571 Nuveen U.S. Infrastructure ... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***r
发帖数: 16594 | 28 ACKMAN 的话，可以解释去年苹果股价的各种不如意。。。。
我早给你们概括了：“ It is dragged down by its own weigh, period.”
细节很复杂，包括什么growth to value呀，index fund buy when price up,index
fund sell when price down. The trend continue until value investors come up.
一句话就是： 老大不好当。
今年应该不一样了，把老大的位置让给GOOGLE就好了。。。
下面是转发。
Index Funds
Index funds and other passive managers have gained increasing market share
in recent years. Investing capital in funds and ETFs that track major market
indexes has recently been what one might call a “one way b... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***r
发帖数: 16594 | 29 ACKMAN 的话，可以解释去年苹果股价的各种不如意。。。。
我早给你们概括了：“ It is dragged down by its own weigh, period.”
细节很复杂，包括什么growth to value呀，index fund buy when price up,index
fund sell when price down. The trend continue until value investors come up.
一句话就是： 老大不好当。
今年应该不一样了，把老大的位置让给GOOGLE就好了。。。
下面是转发。
Index Funds
Index funds and other passive managers have gained increasing market share
in recent years. Investing capital in funds and ETFs that track major market
indexes has recently been what one might call a “one way b... 阅读全帖 |
|
i******r
发帖数: 1175 | 30 4000->2700, you were +1%, now you are 5% up, 100% in A share allocation
since when?
If you can stay 1% up in a down market from 4000->2700, you are mostly not
participating, which does NOT look like so. Now magically, you managed to
allocate 100% recently, what a clown!
Even if you just on average dipped 10% position from 4000-2700, you are
still down 3%+, unless you shorted the market. You could argue that you day-
trade against a trend (and somehow managed to miss all these down days), the
cha... 阅读全帖 |
|
i*****r
发帖数: 372 | 31 嗯, 第一句话略过.
七月满足CHINA FB+EB 达到7%是可行的. 五月底就有了CHINA 至五月底的实际批准数据
和六月allocation 数据, 那末剩下的就可以在七月allocate.我们说七月让CHINA FB+
EB 达到7%并不是指全部实批数达到7%, 而是实批数(五月前)加上allocation(六七月)
达到7%. 六月初决定七月排期的时候, CHINA还差多少到7%就应该allocate多少给CHINA
, 至于到七月底CHINA有没有实际上拿到7%, 那就是CIS的事了, 与DOS无关. |
|
e**o
发帖数: 131 | 32 根据老猪以前披露的数据，这算是非常保守的。
FY2010的allocation是
10/2009 549
11/2009 182
12/2009 306
01/2010 120
02/2010 242
03/2010 411
04/2010 354
05/2010 825
06/2010 691
07/2010 534
08/2010 396
同时也可以算出2010年9月份的visa allocation
Employment Third Preference Visa Allocation September 2010
China
Demand prior to 9/22/2003 48
Demand prior to 10/22/2003 338
Allocation 290
批了多少就不晓得了 |
|
d******8
发帖数: 1972 | 33 Today, 05:13 PM
gcwait2007
Given below is the present position:
Comparison of cumulative demand data for EB2 India, since Oct 2010:
Source: EB2-I USCIS Data - Immigration Wiki
Month Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11
CY-2006 13125 13150 13125 13150 13175
CY-2007 22850 22850 22825 22900 22975
CY-2010 22925 23000 22925 23000 23025
The above data can be interpreted that EB3I to EB2I porting happens and that
demand matches or almost over takes the supply/ availability of visas.
The published Visa B... 阅读全帖 |
|
s***r
发帖数: 1121 | 34 在7%提出时的原则是，是尽量保证平均，不让一国独大。而目前剩余名额的分配方法
，没有文件支持按国别平均分，**但也没有文件支持按PD分。但是，后者违背了这个平
均原则，在事实上造成了印度一家独大。这是O的错误。
The 7% principle is set to assure the fairness and diversity among
immigration applicants from various countries. NO single country can
dominate under this principle. Currently, there are no regulations that
specify that the extra quotes should be allocated based on country origin.
However, no such regulations exist that specify the extra quotes should be
allocated based on priority date, ei... 阅读全帖 |
|
i****y
发帖数: 5184 | 35 Currently, there are no regulations that specify that the extra quotes
should be allocated based on country origin. However, no such regulations
exist that specify the extra quotes should be allocated based on priority
date, either.
这段建议改作：
Moreover, by setting forth the 7% rule, Congress intended to allocate the
quotes evenly among countries, rather than based on priority date. Therefore
, although no regulations affirmatively require that the extra quotes be
allocated based on country origin, ... 阅读全帖 |
|
r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 36 从老印网站上看到：奥傻精确计算让PD停在2007年4月，让老中在2012年财政年开始时
需求3200大于2800，这样老中就必须和老印绑在一起，这样老中就不可以交新的485，
只有等到明年暑假才能和老印前进，看来奥傻太他妈的黑了！
Very well said. I agree w you. The dates in 2011 are so cleverly crafted
that USCIS has eliminated a lot of backlog but at the same time kept enough
to ensure they have discretion to make any further movement. EB2C has just
enough backlog that puts them in exactly same fate as EB2I in terms of any
SFM or BTM.
I am not sure why it should have any effect.
At the beginning of FY2012, ... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*e
发帖数: 1987 | 37 The way they interpret the law is correct. Note that it says "under
subsectionS (a) AND (b) of section 203" and "under such subsectionS". 用了
and不是or，用了复数S，而不是单数each subsection。
other sources：
http://migration.ucdavis.edu/mn/cir/Greenwood/combined.htm
"In addition to setting a higher overall limit on admissions, the 1990 Act
altered the per-country limitations used to determine how many immigrants
may enter the United States each year. Previously, the per-country quota was
set at 20,000 visas per... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*e
发帖数: 1987 | 38 The way they interpret the law is correct. Note that it says "under
subsectionS (a) AND (b) of section 203" and "under such subsectionS". 用了
and不是or，用了复数S，而不是单数each subsection。
other sources：
http://migration.ucdavis.edu/mn/cir/Greenwood/combined.htm
"In addition to setting a higher overall limit on admissions, the 1990 Act
altered the per-country limitations used to determine how many immigrants
may enter the United States each year. Previously, the per-country quota was
set at 20,000 visas per... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***e
发帖数: 29053 | 39 12/04/2011: Soon-to-be-Released January 2012 Visa Bulletin and Potential
Impact on Pending H.R. 3012 in the Senate
Senator Grassley is opposing the H.R. 3012 based on his concern for its
impact on future immigration flows. No matter whatever it means, potentially
release of January 2012 and cut-off date movement for China and India may
have some impact on this bill. There are all kinds of rumors going around on
the January 2012 Visa Bulletin but we will have to wait and see. January
visa allocat... 阅读全帖 |
|
H******i
发帖数: 4704 | 40 也是从这个网站，下面这两个原因中的第一个原因真操蛋，大多数人大概都愿意为早交
I-485付两个钱办AP和EAD.只管收费好了。
03/11/2012: Frozen EB-2 Cut-Off Dates for India and China in April 2012 Visa
Bulletin as Predicted by the Department of State in January 2012
Before the April 2012 Visa Bulletin was released day before yesterday, there
had been all sorts of rumors in the Indian and Chinese community websites
including predictions that there would be a progress to "Current" in April
2012 or at least move another six months. These specutions remained ... 阅读全帖 |
|
M***M
发帖数: 319 | 41 1. "The law requires the "otherwise unused" visa numbers to be allocated in
priority date order",
INA 203 (e) 没有说 the visa number should be allocated by prority date. 可以
查看原文。
2。 这篇文章有说，每个国家不能超过140000*%7=9800。印度那到未分配的12000话。
那么印度一个国家就超过了15.58%=(9800+12000)/140000。这一条违反了INA 203(C)
VISA diversity allocation
3. 如果中国的EB1 和 EB3都没有那到2800的话，但是又不能分配给中国的EB2.那么中
国的EB visa 总数就不到7%。
4.本来只有中国和印度受7%的限制，现在剩余的visa一个也部给中国，那么这个7%只适
用中国。这个可以算歧视吗。这么多的visa 只给印度一个国家，这一点也违反了INA
203 (c) Visa diversity allocation. |
|
f********s
发帖数: 526 | 42 今天早上收到的: 好像只是泛泛的解释了一下, 说了一些官话, 实质性的改善是理都没
理吧:
Our fellow petitioners have reported receiving feedback from Visa Office
regarding the EB-3 visa allocation from at least one congressman's office.
We do not believe the response answers all our questions, and we will follow
up on the issue to further explain the situation. Stay tuned!
As FYI, here is information provided by Visa Office regarding the immigrant
visa number allocation for the applicants in the Employment Third Preference
category (EB-3... 阅读全帖 |
|
k******o
发帖数: 550 | 43 really good meat ,感谢！
虽然里面很多是废话，读完后个人理解visa number allocation有两步，第一步是'
check availability'，第二步才是'Get visa number allocated' ，不是很明确每步
时间多长，但看起来第一步貌似是(准)实时的，第二步就不太清楚了，可能会比较久。
如果在IVAMS里面设好一个COUNTRY LIMIT的话是非常容易保证不超发的，但貌似他们并
没这么干，而是rule-based issurance
另外，不懂field office里面关于申请visa number里同时包括'CCD/IVAMS'啥意思，按
照CCD的文档说法，CCD是被动的。
11. Immigrant Visa Allocation
Management System
(IVAMS)
ITAB#: 97
One way Visa Allocation Data.
IVAMS production data is replicated to CCD. |
|
y******0
发帖数: 8807 | 44 他没想多，如果你看看老排期的第一句话或者还有新排期的第三段话。他一般会等
USCIS给他数据后再算排期
上个月排期：3月9日收到USCIS数据
Allocations in the charts below were made, to the extent possible, in
chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by March
9th.
2015年9月排期：8月11日收到USCIS数据
Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of
reported priority dates, for demand received by August 11th.
https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/law-and-policy/bullet
bulletin-for-september-2015.html
2015年8月排期：7月10日收到US... 阅读全帖 |
|
y******0
发帖数: 8807 | 45 Visa Bulletin Predictions and Updates from Charles Oppenheim (May 18, 2016)
Our office just came back from a discussion session here in Washington, DC
with Charles Oppenheim. Mr. Oppenheim is the Chief of the Visa Control and
Reporting Division at the U.S. Department of State. For many, he is simply
known as the person responsible for the monthly and annual visa number
allocations for family- and employment-based green cards. He is also the
person who prepares and publishes the monthly visa bull... 阅读全帖 |
|
r*****e
发帖数: 12 | 46 这位校友，不知道您是不是在科大混得不咋地把，怎么说话这么没有底气。
我来说一说您指的01级信院学生出路吧。我们系，110人，12人出国，
76人考上/保送研究生，4人没有考上研究生，18人找工作/并找到。
去工作的，上海平均工资4000~5000/月，
深圳平均工资4000~5000/月。
最高工资，年薪7万（税前）
不知道怎么叫出路不好？
，
方
然
喜
比
上
[08/17 22:37:47 3886 1] guest ENTER [email protected] (ALLOC 19105) [www]
[08/17 22:37:47 20570 1] guest ENTER [email protected] (ALLOC 257) [www]
[08/17 22:37:48 5311 1] guest ENTER [email protected] (ALLOC 576) [www]
[08/17 22:37:48 5302 1] guest ENTER [email protected] (ALLOC 22113) |
|
a****2
发帖数: 85 | 47 The oracle database 10.2 report the following error message:
ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 254488 bytes (QERGH
hash-agg,kllcqas:kllsltba)
**********************
but all the parameters don't give any evidence to support the lack of memory
, anyone can help?
Environment:
Window OS 2003, Oracle 10.2, 24G total RAM, 20G sga, 15G pga aggregate.
sga:
lock_sga boolean FALSE
pre_page_sga boolean FALSE
sga_max_size ... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 48 谁叫自己上了嵌入式的贼船，工资低呢。。。C看多了，也不能刷题转码搞互联网
为什么摄像头领域不能有像开源openwrt一样的项目呢？
把海康的dmesg贴出来，大家可以参考，他们用安霸S3L，https://www.ambarella.com/
products/security-ip-cameras/security-ip-camera-products#S3L
[ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
[ 0.000000] Linux version 3.10.73+ ([email protected]) (gcc version 5
.2.1 20151005 (Linaro GCC 5.2-2015.11-2) ) #1 PREEMPT Mon Jan 23 10:38:22
CST 2017
[ 0.000000] CPU: ARMv7 Processor [414fc091] revision 1 (ARMv7), cr=
10c53c7d
[ 0.000000] CPU: PIPT / ... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*****o
发帖数: 473 | 49 I am trying to answer your questions. However, it is involved in some
complicated mechanism which I can't explain easily.
what happens to kernel when it tries to allocate a
block?
--If you are asking for a block of physical memory, then kernel will
allocate it from its buddy manager.
it seems that it is never a problem when you request large blocks
that are bigger than several pages, right?
---Sure, kernel can allocate a large block, but maybe less than 1024 pages.
This mechanism may change with... 阅读全帖 |
|
a***f
发帖数: 45 | 50 I think an pair of overloaded new and delete functions could be pretty helpful
in many cases. It records each allocated/deallocated memory block and
the statement allocating/deleting it. After the main program is ended, it could
output the memory blocks which have not been released yet and the corresponding
statements allocating them.
Besides, we could cache the memory blocks if your program allocate/deallocate
small memory blocks frequently, and the performance fo the program could be
improved |
|
