m*e
发帖数: 155 | 1 Thanks man. I know you are a better player than I having read some of you
previous
posting. That 1N xfer scheme is interesting/new to me, although I don't get
the idea
of tranfering rather than bidding directly. However, that 1N is a SUITED one,
which
is the key here. What I don't like my p's 1N is his no fit/no suit (and I am
not
defending prec's 1N btw):
1. 6-7hcp, no fit no suit:
very truely indeed opps may well bid and make 1N, but that doesn't
justify that
we have to play 1N, or pla |
|
m*e
发帖数: 155 | 2
14
1N-x or even 1N doesn't need to be a disaster to make 1N an unwise choice---
it suffices if 1N-x or 1N costs more than opp's playing 1N.
Yes you are absolutely right about the MAXIMUM case, but it is the MINIMUM
that
matters here. This is a basic logic seen every where in bridge, for instance:
1. would you systematically direct-raise 1H/1S opening with 2 trumps, just
because 1H/1S doesn't deny 7 cards(MAX)?
2. would you systematically go over 4S to try slam in case your partner is
MAXI |
|
m*e
发帖数: 155 | 3 1H/1S=11-5hcp (precision, but I suppose it is similar with standard sys),
opponent direct takeout doubles, opener's partner(responder) bids 1N.
My partner wants to change the precision definition of such 1N, which is
not very relevant, to "6-8hcp no good suit(we play, after opp's double,
weak 2 over 1 and weak jump) and no good support" hands.
I make very little sense out of such a 1N design. Would like to hear your
opinions... |
|
m*e
发帖数: 155 | 4
1. Yes 1N is hard to defend, but that refers to 1N with roughly equal or
higher
hcps when hands are all balanced. To play NT if you don't have suits you
got
to have hcps. For the combined 17/18 hcp no fit no suit hands, where are
the
trick sources to make? (Note that opener's long suit is known to be 7-
cards
combined and the one has better defense value is sitting behind him)
Yes if opponents make defense mistakes everything can happen, but that
does
not grant that a biddin |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 5
when
yes, but 1n is not direct, it is after intervention if i am correct.
Does
even
1N.
0+hcp,
this
Competely agree with this x and nt. It should be sth 18, 9.
any
wrong.
risk |
|
m*e
发帖数: 155 | 6 1. Yes, it makes all the sense to allow the responder to bid "BOTH
weak hands with a long suit AND good hands with a long suit" through
a sort of transfer. Mike Lawrence recommends a similar variation,
a variation of Capp too. In that sense, 1N would contribute much
more than what is defined by precision (the normal 1H/S-2H/S hands).
2. In terms of giving opps more room, it is not a fatal drawback to me:
Using 1N rather than 2D/H to show direct raise to 2 hand, opps get
free:
|
|
|
|
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 10 if you play 1NT as forcing or semiforcing, it's usually not a good
idea to introduce your 4 card spade suit with about 16-bad 18 HCP,
because partner usually denies spade suit. so you should normally rebid
2C or 2D here. Thus, we have a free bid: 2S. This 2S can be treated as
GF and starts a relay sequence.
1H-1N-2S:
2NT:relay.
3C/D: natural.
3H: 6 card hearts, about 19 HCP, ask partner to place the final contract.
3S: 5-6 in majors.
2NT: 4-5 in majors.
4C/D/H: self splinter in C/D/S, |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 11 1. 1N IS VERY HARD TO DEFEND. 2, OP HAVE TO BID THEIR SUIT AT 2 LEVEL, WHICH
IS NOT WITHOUT RISK【 在 mhe (mhe) 的大作中提到: 】
one,
17hcp
has
so
trying
decision
sys), |
|
m*e
发帖数: 155 | 12 I said 1. "direct-raise", not after intevention
2. "systematically", i.e. not just random/occassionally,
but consistently and convention-like.
it
bridge,
That is DIFFERENT: when I open 1N/2N strong or open 2H/2S preemptive, or even
a regular 1H/1S, of course I am risking parnter's having 0hcp and got set a
lot.
But it is not what I called "unwise" risk. At opening time, you don't have
info.
about others' hands, you have to assume and act. When you have enough info
later
in biddi |
|
m*e
发帖数: 155 | 13 1N.
0+hcp,
and denies 6+hcp.
this
any |
|
r**********1
发帖数: 1004 | 14 因为穷， 玩不起 leica, 所以不知道leica如何。我先后把玩过的有 Nikon 大 F, FM2
, FM, F3, Canon F-1, NF-1, A-1, AE-1, 电子化后的有， EOS-1n, EOS-3, F100. 但
是要论手感， F-1真是好。 就是你拿到手里， 就感觉像一个tank。因为 F-1是Canon
终于和Nikon抗衡的机器。 当时我淘的是基本新的， 带 28 2.8, 50 1.4, 135 2.8,
大概 $200. 三年前回国， 一哥们看到， 非常想要， 就送他了。 想着回美国再淘，
结果再也没有这么新的了。 倒是， A-1(不过是电子快门， NF-1是混合快门-牛， F-1
是机械快门)， 高了个新的， 但是一个女儿帮她妈卖， 说有很多Parts, 别人问是不
是零件散了， 我当时的想法是肯定是镜头， 结果是一个基本是新的A-1和一堆镜头 |
|
p**p
发帖数: 3386 | 15 我觉得NF-1+AE finder的操作比较方便，样子也最好看。但要说道可靠性，还是得全机
械的F-1n，完全就是个金属疙瘩，非常耐操，而且不怕恶劣环境，现在是我出门最信赖
的机器。 |
|
h*******g
发帖数: 10585 | 16 F-1N是三台鸡鸡中评价最高的一台
也是Canon最后一台机械快门机器 |
|
p**p
发帖数: 3386 | 17 这和我个人使用经验相符，曾经有次出去kayaking，F-1N掉水里了，捡起来，放太阳下
晒干，换了胶卷，几个小时以后就又开始拍照了 |
|
p**p
发帖数: 3386 | 18 我喜欢到处跑，我的F-1N经历过高湿、高温、高海拔、低温、风沙的各种环境，可以说
真是风里来雨里去，是我最信赖的机器 |
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 19 深圳市疾控中心昨日召开新闻通气会，详解甲型H 1N 1季节性流感与H 7 N 9禽流感的
区别，并透露深圳暂未发现人感染H 7 N 9禽流感病例，市民不要恐慌。市疾控中心传
染病防治科主任谢旭说，季节性流感主要包括甲型H 1N 1、甲型H 3 N 2以及乙型流感
等类型，而甲型H 1N 1流感占8 0 %以上，近期流感检测数据与往年同期基本持平，市
民可以采取一般流感预防措施，也可以注射流感疫苗。目前，深圳已成立人感染H 7 N
9禽流感防控专家组，组长为深圳市第三人民医院院长周伯平、深圳市第一人民医院副
院长邱晨，市三院已经指定专用病区应对可能出现的疫情。
深圳目前发现流感80%以上属H 1N 1
此前，深圳排查确诊3例甲型H 1N 1流感病例，分别在市二医院、北大深圳医院治
疗。“昨晚1例不明原因肺炎已检测完毕，并非甲型H 1N 1流感等，也排除H 7N 9禽流
感病毒感染。”昨日上午，市疾控中心传染病防治科主任谢旭介绍，市民很关注深圳发
现甲型H 1N 1流感病例，其实该流感并不陌生，已经是季节性流感，现在深圳发现的流
感中80%以上为H 1N 1。
“我们一般简称甲型H 1N ... 阅读全帖 |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 20 1M 1N:开叫人11-21点，应叫人5-12点。在开叫人做常规再叫后，他的牌力仍可高达18
点（不够跳再叫逼局）。 这样应叫人持7-10点时，是Pass, 维持叫牌，还是邀请呢？
Gazzilli的主要目的就是解决这个问题。
基本想法是在1M-1N后，放弃定约2C, 用其作为一个人工逼叫，除了可以是正常的草花
套，还包括任何均型牌，和17点以上的强牌。于是除2C以外的常规再叫，上限是16点。
（3M以上的再叫，和原来一样）
1. 跳再叫， 1M-1N-3X, 就和精确里一样：上限16点，5-5， 通常5输张。
2. 1M-1N-2N 不是自然叫，通常用做显示6M-4m型，5输张。
3. 1M-1N-2D 自然，11-16点，保证5+-4+。 等等。
1M-1N-2C后续的进程有许多不同的版本。但是基本上是，2D人工再叫，保证8（9？）点
以上。 2H到3C都是示弱，否认8点。 更高的叫牌是逼局。
我建议一个简单易记忆的：
1M-1N
2C-?
2D 8P+ any
2M signoff
2S over 1H, signoff C+D, short H.
2N ... 阅读全帖 |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 21 1M 1N:开叫人11-21点，应叫人5-12点。在开叫人做常规再叫后，他的牌力仍可高达18
点（不够跳再叫逼局）。 这样应叫人持7-10点时，是Pass, 维持叫牌，还是邀请呢？
Gazzilli的主要目的就是解决这个问题。
基本想法是在1M-1N后，放弃定约2C, 用其作为一个人工逼叫，除了可以是正常的草花
套，还包括任何均型牌，和17点以上的强牌。于是除2C以外的常规再叫，上限是16点。
（3M以上的再叫，和原来一样）
1. 跳再叫， 1M-1N-3X, 就和精确里一样：上限16点，5-5， 通常5输张。
2. 1M-1N-2N 不是自然叫，通常用做显示6M-4m型，5输张。
3. 1M-1N-2D 自然，11-16点，保证5+-4+。 等等。
1M-1N-2C后续的进程有许多不同的版本。但是基本上是，2D人工再叫，保证8（9？）点
以上。 2H到3C都是示弱，否认8点。 更高的叫牌是逼局。
我建议一个简单易记忆的：
1M-1N
2C-?
2D 8P+ any
2M signoff
2S over 1H, signoff C+D, short H.
2N ... 阅读全帖 |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 22 1. 必要性：尽量用不同的序列区分不同的牌情。
1N-2D-2H-4H 和 1N-4D-4H-？当然应该显示不同的牌情。
2. 合理性：叫品的安排应该合乎逻辑。
1N-2D-2H-4H: 将主动权交给开叫人，有询问的意味，所以是满贯邀请。
1N-4D-4H：主动权仍在应叫人，有命令的意味，所以不是满贯邀请。
1N-2D-2H-4N：如果满贯与否仅仅在于关键张，应该明确地用命令式的叫牌：1N-4D-4H-
4N。并且在高阶转移，应该暗示已有8张以上将牌配合。在低阶转移，只是一种探查，
暗示还没有确认将牌配合。所以1N-2D-2H-4N应该是5张红心均型的满贯邀请。
倒过来也似乎可行，但是我认为这样不合逻辑。 |
|
v**e
发帖数: 8422 | 23 美海军陆战队换装两型直升机大幅提升作战能力
来源：中国网 作者：知远
2008年8月，海军陆战队第3飞机联队第39飞机大队第303轻型攻击直升机训练中队的
飞行员，在加利福尼亚州彭德尔顿营的一次限制性区域着陆训练中驾驶1架UH-1Y“美国
佬”直升机着陆。这个中队是海军陆战队中第一个为UH-1Y培训机组人员和维护人员的
中队。
美国海军陆战队正大力推进航空兵装备的现代化，直升机的升级只是其中一个组成
部分。海军陆战队目前装备的UH-1N “休伊”通用直升机和AH-1W “眼镜蛇”攻击直升
机是早在越南战争时代就投入作战行动的两型直升机。海军陆战队准备对它们实施大幅
度的升级改造，希望可以获得21世纪的作战能力。
海军陆战队直升机升级计划名为“H-1升级”计划，主要内容是大幅提高UH-1N“休
伊”通用直升机和AH-1W“眼镜蛇”攻击直升机的飞行时速、最大航程、飞行高度、负
载、态势感知和安全能力。
“休伊”直升机经过升级后编号改为UH-1Y，或者说“美国佬（Yankee）”直升机
。目前这种直升机在阿富汗已经进行了2次部署，和MV-22“鱼鹰”倾转翼飞机一起参与
了海军陆战队在诺扎德地... 阅读全帖 |
|
o*******n
发帖数: 6500 | 24 就是叫品是
1x-1y-1z之后之后怎么叫的约定
包括
1c-1d-1h
1c-1d-1s
1c-1d-1n
1c-1h-1s
1c-1h-1n
1c-1s-1n
1d-1h-1s
1d-1h-1n
1d-1s-1n
1h-1s-1n |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 25 分析非常透彻，有条有理。
如果是用Texas Transfer的话，那么1N-2D-2H-4H是温和的满贯试探，1N-2D-2H-4N是5
张红心均型的满贯邀请。
现在再讲一些更基本的，但BBO上经常看到的错误。
BBO上很多牌手没有认识到，类似1N-2D-2H-4H的序列，不管你是否采用Texas Transfer
，这个序列本身应该保证至少6张红心。其中的内在逻辑是：2D是迫叫，同伴的2H并不
保证红心支持，可能只有两张。一般情况下你不愿在高阶去打5-2配的将牌，除非是不
得已。所以直接叫4H，显示你确信红心作为将牌是正确的，你方至少有8张配合；推论
就是，你手里至少要有6张红心。
不晓得为什么，这一点看似浅显，但不少牌手并未掌握。与此相对应的是，开叫方也经
常没有意识到：同伴的转换叫并不显示任何牌力，也许是白皮。如果同伴有额
外牌力，会在转移叫之后进一步澄清，开叫方绝不应当在此之前对于同伴的牌力作任何
假设。我经常看到类似1N-2D-2H-3N的序列，开叫方拿的是两张红心的17点牌。不论结
果如何，这个叫牌本身是错误的。
应叫方如果只有5张红心，但持有进局牌力，现在我们已经知道，... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*******e
发帖数: 394 | 26 NWS-WCATWC Tsunami Advisory
WEPA41 PAAQ 280653
TSUWCA
BULLETIN
TSUNAMI MESSAGE NUMBER 8
NWS WEST COAST/ALASKA TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER PALMER AK
1153 PM PDT SAT OCT 27 2012
THE ADVISORY REGIONS ARE KEPT THE SAME.
NEW OBSERVATIONS ARE ADDED BELOW
...THE TSUNAMI ADVISORY CONTINUES IN EFFECT FOR THE COASTAL
AREAS OF CALIFORNIA AND OREGON FROM GUALALA POINT
CALIFORNIA/LOCATED 80 MILES NW OF SAN FRANCISCO/ TO
DOUGLAS-LANE COUNTY LINE OREGON/10 MILES SW OF FLORENCE/...
...THE TSUNAMI ADVISORY C... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 27 I would bid 2H.
The point is that your hand is not balanced.
you aren't sure where you belong to.
if pd has
Sxxx HQx DQxxx CAxxx
you should play 5D.
if pd has:
Sxxx Hxx DQxx CAQxxx, you should have reasonable play in 3NT.
if pd has a minimum hand, you should play 2NT.
if pd has:
Sxxx HAQJ DQx Cxxxxx, the right contract can even be 4H.
if you bid 2H, you can find all the reasonable spot.
for the first hand:
1D 1N
2H 3D
3S 4C
5D
for the second hand,
1D 1N
2H 3C
3NT
for the 3rd hand:
1D 1N
2H 3H
3S |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 28 This case is irrelevant as a 1N response from a passed hand is only
semi-forcing.
Really, all you lose is the possibility to play 1N after a major opening, but
that almost never happens -- either two of the major will make anyway, or
opponents will balance.
Notice forcing 1N also brings garbage raise. Now you can stick a 1NT response
with a garbage 3-3-4-3 shape and 4 points when pd opens 1H, for example,
preparing to take preference back to H (treating it as doubleton), this tends
to make it ha |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 29 the problem is that you might not always hear partner responds 2C
when you open 1D. you often have no good rebid if partner bids 1H/S/NT,
well, arrows suggests a 3C rebid, usually it shows at least 4 clubs, but now
... I am just wondering this might happen sometimes:
1D 1N
3C ?
wow, 7C is possible when I hold:
SKQx Hxxx D- CAxxxxxx
but I don't know how to ask for key cards,
ok, let's try 6C only,
1D 1N
3C 6C
oops, I'd rather bid 6D,
1D 1N
3C 6C
6D ?
can I correct it to 7C? perhaps may not have |
|
C*****9
发帖数: 147 | 30 常见叫牌需要琢磨透，同伴间探讨也重要。下面几个牌例中你准备如何处理,队式比赛
，你和同伴打2/1，1NT逼叫没有其它特别约定，叫牌:
1. Sxx HKxxx DAQxx CJxx
1S (pd) - 1N - 2D - ?
2. SAx HQxx DKxxx Cxxxx
1S (pd) - 1N - 2H - ?
3. SAx HQxxx DQxxx Cxxx
1S (pd) - 1N - 2H - ? |
|
C*****9
发帖数: 147 | 31 前2题都是实战题，第3是第2题的改型，更难抉择。
我本意是1，2是不能Pass的(发生在牌桌上)，须防同伴15-17的中限牌力(如果1N不能有
5张高花的话，就更不该Pass了)，而且还可能有S6。但这2手牌去2N邀叫也勉强(考虑同
伴14-15HCP进局，打成可能很小)，只能诸害相权取其轻，叫2S。
2/1体系1N逼叫中，回2S基本含义大致是6-7HCP，S3或6-9HCP，S2，应该是大体符合对
牌的描述的。
这3题实际更需要同伴之间讨论的是1M - 1N -2x - ?邀叫的低限是什么。 |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 32 双无，序分赛
S J972
H KJ98
D ---
C AQ983
(1S) P （1N） ?
假定你不叫，叫牌进程：
(1S) P (1N) P
(2D) P (3D) ?
是否加入竞叫呢？
假定你加倍：
(1S) P (1N) P
(2D) P (3D) DBL
(P) 3H (4D) ?
现在怎么办？ |
|
p**p
发帖数: 3386 | 33 我的印象F-1N其实就是过片扳手改了一下，减小了高速快门
以前有个老F-1，现在记不起来为什么就很快出了，倒是留了若干台F-1N
NF-1的快门是机械电子混合快门，我的使用经验是没有F-1N可靠 |
|
t****g
发帖数: 35582 | 34 EOS-1n/v是数码机？
从EOS-1n开始，Nikon在旗舰机身就不行了，后来E0S-1v出来，更是落后了一代半，一
点脾气也没有。
C+的白炮开始统治运动场就是从EOS-1n以后的时代开始的。Nikon一直到D3才算是推出
了真正意义上能和Canon抗衡的旗舰机身，中间差不多被压了近20年。 |
|
c****t
发帖数: 19049 | 35 第九集：这就是宇宙！第三章：进发与审判
“……之后的数天里，我们进行了十几场会议，通过各种仪器观察到的结果，在那处废
墟已经不存在任何完好的宇宙战舰了，而且通过那处战舰废墟带的信号分析，并没有任
何非规律ìn的信号存在，所有的信号都是依照时间进行规律ìn的外放，有些类似急救
或者求救广播。”
姚源边推着张恒，边给他介绍道：“所以了，我们在经过了各种验证与讨论后，决定向
着战舰废墟带前进，到目前为止，已经飞行了半个多月时间，事实上，早在十天前就有
民众现了那处外星战舰废墟带，毕竟已经过去三天时间还没有进行任何跃迁，而那处外
星战舰废墟带还会不停出闪烁的光芒来，只要用望远镜就可以看到大概，直到现在为止
，用r眼也可以看到大概了，所以保密条例已经失效，现在全希望号的人都在热烈讨论
那处外星战舰废墟带。”
张恒好长时间都没回过神来，他傻傻的用力扭头看向身后的窗户，直到姚源重重拍了他
肩膀一下，他这才惊醒过来，然后立刻便惊喜的大叫起来道：“啊！外星文明，外星战
舰，哇！这是真的吗？莫不是像海市蜃楼那样的幻影吧？”
姚源失笑的说道：“宇宙那里来什么海市蜃楼，这肯定是真实的……或者说，以我们人
类科... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****t
发帖数: 19049 | 36 第九集：这就是宇宙！第三章：进发与审判
“……之后的数天里，我们进行了十几场会议，通过各种仪器观察到的结果，在那处废
墟已经不存在任何完好的宇宙战舰了，而且通过那处战舰废墟带的信号分析，并没有任
何非规律ìn的信号存在，所有的信号都是依照时间进行规律ìn的外放，有些类似急救
或者求救广播。”
姚源边推着张恒，边给他介绍道：“所以了，我们在经过了各种验证与讨论后，决定向
着战舰废墟带前进，到目前为止，已经飞行了半个多月时间，事实上，早在十天前就有
民众现了那处外星战舰废墟带，毕竟已经过去三天时间还没有进行任何跃迁，而那处外
星战舰废墟带还会不停出闪烁的光芒来，只要用望远镜就可以看到大概，直到现在为止
，用r眼也可以看到大概了，所以保密条例已经失效，现在全希望号的人都在热烈讨论
那处外星战舰废墟带。”
张恒好长时间都没回过神来，他傻傻的用力扭头看向身后的窗户，直到姚源重重拍了他
肩膀一下，他这才惊醒过来，然后立刻便惊喜的大叫起来道：“啊！外星文明，外星战
舰，哇！这是真的吗？莫不是像海市蜃楼那样的幻影吧？”
姚源失笑的说道：“宇宙那里来什么海市蜃楼，这肯定是真实的……或者说，以我们人
类科... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*****c
发帖数: 5202 | 37 读不懂英文？
比如说，你一单买了n刀的东西，他给你的点数就是n+0.1n+10=1.1n+10点
就是说小面额的消费就用这张卡
乎再用Chase的Checking账户，或
是再详细的信息就没有了…… |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 38 1. Vul vs not. hold
xx Axxxx AJT9x x
RHO opens 1S. The vul made you a coward and, say, you pass. LHO bids a forcing
1NT, RHO bid 2C.
(a) do you double this?
(b) if you pass, LHO takes preference to 2S, and two passes to you. Do you
balance?
2. All white. Hold
x AQJ9xxx Jx Jxx
Partner opens 3D, RHO overcalls 3S, what now?
3. All white. Hold
Kx Kxx AQT9x Jxx, bidding went
LHO CHO RHO YOU
1N - 2D x
- - xx -
- -
1N's 15-17, 2D's transfer.
you lead a club, and dummy comes down to
Axxx Ax K |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 39 just play a hand with a claimed advanced player from israel. the bidding is
extremely funny.
pd holds
S: KX
H: AK
D: AJTXX
C: ATXX
I HOLD;
S: JT9XXXX
H: TXX
D: X
C: QX
OP DID NOT INTERVENE, my pd opened 1N, I BID 2H, TRANSFER, PLAN TO ADD TO 4S
AFTER THAT. THEN THE AUCTION GOES;
1N-2H(!)-3N-4S-6S.
OP lead sa so that i can drop sq, but still -1. |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 40 I sit south, hold:
S: AKXX
H: XX
D: AJ9XX
C: AC
I opened 1d, pd 1h, i rebid 1s, pd 1n, i leap to 3n.
question: what is the scope of 1n in this sequence? I think my 1s is at most
semi forcing, pd keep bidding, so his hand should be 8-10, so i bid 3n. but it
turned out that his hand is:
S: QXX
H: JXXX
D: QT
C: QXXX
i think pd should pass my 1s. any comments?
|
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 41 Hehe, after we down 1 in this board. Folllows right away another very similar
hand:
Opp pass throughout, I opened with 1C with:
S: KXXX
H: A
D: KTXX
C: AQXX
Pd responded with 1N, again i think this 1n should be 8-10, coz he did not
raise my c, neither bid d,h or s. Again I leap to 3n. Pd holds:
S: JTX
H: QXX
D: AQXX
C: JXX
This time it works, coz my Rho lead J from H JT9XX.
Comparing these two hands, you will find that my hand is more or less same. My
question is how to distingu |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 42 So 2c then 2S doesnt guarantee 4 card hearts? what about xfer to heart suit?
If you have 5 card hearts and invitational hands, how to bid it?
1N 2D
2H 2N?
1N 2C
2S 3H?【 在 cozofu (但为君故) 的大作中提到: 】 |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 43 i think 1n is the right bid, 2c should promise 6cards, rebid 1n shows 18-19,
Qx should be enough. since pd passed 1h, 2h cant be cuebid, must be real
suit.【 在 gloomyturkey (一只郁闷的火鸡) 的大作中提到: 】
路
大 |
|
g********d
发帖数: 89 | 44 Dealer E
Vul: N-S
you are south, holding
Ax Axx AQTx QJxx
N E S W
- 1c ?1
What is your bid?
Suppose you bid 1nt
N E S W
- 1c 1n p
2c 3c ?2
What is your bid again
Suppose you pass
N E S W
- 1c 1n p
2c 3c p p
3s p ?3
your bid again?
it is a random partner, assume sayc,
15-17 1nt, stayman, major transfer |
|
g********d
发帖数: 89 | 45 u dealer, vul forgot, but think doesnt matter. opps are silent.
play 2/1
hold:
Q Axx KQxx AQxxx
open 1c(?), p bid 1s, what is ur rebid? can this hand bid 2d reverse?
1n? 2n(stretch 1 point)?
and p had AJxxxx KQx - Jxxx
what happen is:
1c-1s-1n-4s-all pass
place the blame if u want. |
|
b****s
发帖数: 472 | 46 I play 1n direct overcall shows 2 stoppers. S Kx and 2245 shape
don't seem right for 1n.
the ideal bidding would be:
(1s) X - 2H
- 3C - 4C
- ...
what would you bid with N or S's hands? |
|
o*******n
发帖数: 6500 | 47 我个人不会叫1NT
不过现在很多人的风格，这个牌叫1N也正常
如果叫了1N，我觉得还是正常完成transfer，
5-1是你歪曲的结果，
in |
|
o*******n
发帖数: 6500 | 48 看看孙铭的这副牌
S: K52
H: AKJx
D: 642
C: AT5
她是dealer, both vul
孙/王 14-16的1N
孙 奥肯 王 阿尼姆
1N - 2C 2D
- - x -
2H - 2S -
3D - 3H -
?
你怎么叫？ |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 49 You still didn't realize how dangerous 2C can be.
Suppose the bidding goes like: 1D 2C 2H 2S:
Now you show 4S +5C, you partner holds Ax xxxx AQJx QJx
so he bids 3C to set up trumps. Now you have a problem, your 3D only shows 3
+D.
Anyway, you bid 3D. Now your partner knows that his H holding is weak. So he
bids 3S as a cuebid.
Now what? 4C is waiting. 4D is RKC in C, you are endplayed. Still, you are
smart, so you just bid 6D to end this nonsense. However, your partner is
also smart. You jump to... 阅读全帖 |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 50 In a knockout, you start the last set down by 46 IMPs. Now 11 board done, 5
to go and it seems you have picked up 20 something IMPs so far.
vulnerable, you pick up:
S AKTxx H Kxx D AQ C AJx
Open 1C (strong), partner 1N(balanced 8-10 HCP), you rebid natural 2S,
partner 2N.
This hand is an Ace more than a minimum (17P+ balanced) and you decide to
give another push: 3C, partner raises to 4C.
Partner is likely to have 5 clubs, because otherwise he may rather bid 3 new
suit to imply club fit than rai... 阅读全帖 |
|
