由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
shopping版 - LCD厂家正在CLEAR INVENTORY
相关主题
Shopping 版的都是购物达人,问一个HDTV 的问题,谢谢!Dell Vostro 220s Core 2 Duo 2.93GHz Desktop PC w/ 20" LCD 399
3D电视出来了,还有LED的夹击,那LCD还要活吗?你弄我的cost down也很明显
LCD和LED的电视机差别有多大啊?很负责地告诉大家,黑五没有电视机deal (转载)
Sony 55'' LED LCD液晶跟等离子hdtv如何取舍?
Thinkpad W520: LED or LCD?新蛋有什么可以买的?
Dell's SHARP 42TV懂行的讲讲为什么三星的LCD TV比SONY的薄很多?
Best Buy $899的那个三星LCD 46 120Hz如何?LCD LED 哪个看上去更舒服些呢? thanks
Samsung 电视太鸡肋还是有别的解决方案?一定要用LED屏吗?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: lcd话题: led话题: dimming话题: picture话题: leds
进入shopping版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
g***l
发帖数: 18555
1
LCD厂家正在CLEAR INVENTORY,主要是老的PLASMA,60HZ LCD,明年估计就全淘汰了,
120HZ BLACKLIT LED明年是低端货,240HZ TRUE LOCA DIMM LED将是主流
d****n
发帖数: 12461
2
我觉得不可能。低端永远会有市场的。full array虽然效果好,但是耗电,edge lit仍
然可以以省电和超薄来占据低端市场。
越做越差也不是没可能。像现在笔记本屏幕一样,以后可能都采用低端tn屏幕了。

【在 g***l 的大作中提到】
: LCD厂家正在CLEAR INVENTORY,主要是老的PLASMA,60HZ LCD,明年估计就全淘汰了,
: 120HZ BLACKLIT LED明年是低端货,240HZ TRUE LOCA DIMM LED将是主流

g***l
发帖数: 18555
3
到底是LOCAL DIMMING的费电还是EDGE LIT费电啊,LOCAL的不是可以控制的更黑么,应
该省电啊

【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得不可能。低端永远会有市场的。full array虽然效果好,但是耗电,edge lit仍
: 然可以以省电和超薄来占据低端市场。
: 越做越差也不是没可能。像现在笔记本屏幕一样,以后可能都采用低端tn屏幕了。

g***l
发帖数: 18555
4
Unfortunately for TV shoppers, the confusion just increases from there. To
help cut through the clutter we're going to lengthen our descriptions beyond
the "LED TV" shorthand, and tell you how picture quality generally compares
with standard LCD. More details are available in our LED TVs: 10 things you
need to know companion piece as well as the individual reviews.
Full-array without local dimming: The rarest of the bunch but the most
familiar in concept. These models are just like standard LCD-based TVs aside
from the fact that the CCFL backlight is replaced by LEDs. The "full-array"
means that the LEDs themselves are arranged behind the entire LCD panel,
not just along the edge.
Picture quality impact: No difference compared with standard LCD.
Example below: Sharp LC-46LE700UN
Edge-lit without local dimming: The most common today. Chances are if you
see an "LED TV" advertised, it's this variety, which was first widely
introduced by Samsung in 2009, then imitated in 2010 by just about everyone
else. It's characterized by thin cabinet designs--around just an inch or
even less in depth--that lead to decreased weight in shipping and wall-
mounting, along with increased bragging rights (although we fail to see much
practical appeal versus a standard, 3-to-5-inch-deep flat-panel TV). Unlike
full-array models, the LEDs on these sets are arranged only along the edge
of the LCD panel, and can illuminate the center and other areas of the
screen using so-called "light guides."
Picture quality impact: No major advantage over standard LCD, and can have
even more uniformity problems, such as brighter edges compared with the
middle.
Example below: Samsung UNC6500 series
Full-array with local dimming: The original and still the best. There are
exceptions, but in general, TVs with this LED backlight configuration are
the best-performing LCDs you can buy. They're similar to full-array models,
but the individual zones of LEDs can be dimmed or brightened independently.
Picture quality impact: Can have significantly better black levels and
uniformity than normal LCD, but will also exhibit "blooming," or stray
illumination, to some extent.
Examples below: Vizio XVT3 series, Sony XBR-HX909 series
Edge-lit with local dimming: A new innovation for 2010, currently available
on select models from Samsung, LG and Sony. The idea is to allow some
dimming of the screen in independent areas without having to place LEDs
behind the LCD panel, just along the edge.
Picture quality impact: In our tests, the Samsung preformed relatively well
and the LG did not, although neither matched the picture quality of full-
array with local dimming and both exhibited more blooming.
Examples below: Samsung UNC8000 series, LG LE5500 series
g***l
发帖数: 18555
5
看了这个介绍,越发的不明白LED的差别了,到底谁更省电,谁的画面更好看?
d****n
发帖数: 12461
6
full array+local dimming的好吧。要不然效果比不过plasma。

【在 g***l 的大作中提到】
: 看了这个介绍,越发的不明白LED的差别了,到底谁更省电,谁的画面更好看?
e**s
发帖数: 4638
7
哪里是cut INVENTORY, 那些低端的PLASMA,60HZ LCD 都是BBY/Walmart/Target/Sears
为今年没钱但又想过节的老美量身定制的 。。。。。。lol
c*********7
发帖数: 7607
8

re,明年240HZ主流基本不可能啊
同搞不懂笔记本都搞TN屏。

【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得不可能。低端永远会有市场的。full array虽然效果好,但是耗电,edge lit仍
: 然可以以省电和超薄来占据低端市场。
: 越做越差也不是没可能。像现在笔记本屏幕一样,以后可能都采用低端tn屏幕了。

1 (共1页)
进入shopping版参与讨论
相关主题
一定要用LED屏吗?Thinkpad W520: LED or LCD?
Sharp 60" LCD HDTV $1650 怎么样?Dell's SHARP 42TV
老金请问怎么看LCD是不是LED backlight的?Best Buy $899的那个三星LCD 46 120Hz如何?
Just bought X301, but...Samsung 电视太鸡肋还是有别的解决方案?
Shopping 版的都是购物达人,问一个HDTV 的问题,谢谢!Dell Vostro 220s Core 2 Duo 2.93GHz Desktop PC w/ 20" LCD 399
3D电视出来了,还有LED的夹击,那LCD还要活吗?你弄我的cost down也很明显
LCD和LED的电视机差别有多大啊?很负责地告诉大家,黑五没有电视机deal (转载)
Sony 55'' LED LCD液晶跟等离子hdtv如何取舍?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: lcd话题: led话题: dimming话题: picture话题: leds