c******n
发帖数: 4965 | 1 this is the thing I don't like about rangefinders
when you change to non-50mm lens, you have to put on a new view finder,
every time you buy a new lens, supposedly you need a new finder.
the universal finder is simply ugly and huge and defeats the purpose of
rangefinder |
a***a
发帖数: 40617 | 2 。。。那要看你用的是啥机身了。。。
至少我用的G2可以从28mm到90mm
【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: this is the thing I don't like about rangefinders
: when you change to non-50mm lens, you have to put on a new view finder,
: every time you buy a new lens, supposedly you need a new finder.
: the universal finder is simply ugly and huge and defeats the purpose of
: rangefinder
|
h*****e
发帖数: 439 | 3 you RF only has 50mm framelines?
【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: this is the thing I don't like about rangefinders
: when you change to non-50mm lens, you have to put on a new view finder,
: every time you buy a new lens, supposedly you need a new finder.
: the universal finder is simply ugly and huge and defeats the purpose of
: rangefinder
|
c******s
发帖数: 5583 | |
c******n
发帖数: 4965 | 5 zorki (and I guess Leica IIIa too ) has only a very small RF,
no frameline at all.
I guess I could "imagine" a frame line for lenses > 50mm
that's easy
but for < 50mm, I had to approximate the actual view space by extending
the current view from center. the ratio is easily calculated from simple
trigonomy
【在 h*****e 的大作中提到】
: you RF only has 50mm framelines?
|
h*****e
发帖数: 439 | 6 OK,that's the problem for a specific RF(s) then.
【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: zorki (and I guess Leica IIIa too ) has only a very small RF,
: no frameline at all.
: I guess I could "imagine" a frame line for lenses > 50mm
: that's easy
: but for < 50mm, I had to approximate the actual view space by extending
: the current view from center. the ratio is easily calculated from simple
: trigonomy
|
