b******n
发帖数: 1269 | 1 How does a manufacturer decide where to put the engine.
Eg, why does F430 have a rear engine while 599 has a front engine? |
x*x
发帖数: 2001 | 2 本来就是两个不同系列的车，
从wiki上看来的，
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrari
【在 b******n 的大作中提到】
: How does a manufacturer decide where to put the engine.
: Eg, why does F430 have a rear engine while 599 has a front engine?
|
y*******n
发帖数: 10103 | |
x*x
发帖数: 2001 | 4 请楼主花钱买碳纤维的字吧，呵呵
【在 y*******n 的大作中提到】
: 这个得让碳纤维牛人来码字。
|
f********m
发帖数: 8397 | 5 我虎说一句，559太重了
【在 b******n 的大作中提到】
: How does a manufacturer decide where to put the engine.
: Eg, why does F430 have a rear engine while 599 has a front engine?
|
y*******n
发帖数: 10103 | 6 恩，跑不过F430，GT车嘛，富人出游用的。
【在 f********m 的大作中提到】
: 我虎说一句，559太重了
|
c*********r
发帖数: 19468 | 7
I think the most important factors here including
1) practicability concern
2) availability of platform
3) heritage
in terms of vehicle dynamics, mid-engine is the best layout, but you have to
keep the above factors in
mind when you design a car.
for example, the 911 must go rear-engine. that's the heritage factor
4 seater GTs (including most 2+2) must go front-engine (including front-mid)
, that's the practicability
factor
hard-top convertibles such as the California must go front-engine, that
【在 b******n 的大作中提到】
: How does a manufacturer decide where to put the engine.
: Eg, why does F430 have a rear engine while 599 has a front engine?
|
b******n
发帖数: 1269 | 8 有道理
to
mid)
【在 c*********r 的大作中提到】
:
: I think the most important factors here including
: 1) practicability concern
: 2) availability of platform
: 3) heritage
: in terms of vehicle dynamics, mid-engine is the best layout, but you have to
: keep the above factors in
: mind when you design a car.
: for example, the 911 must go rear-engine. that's the heritage factor
: 4 seater GTs (including most 2+2) must go front-engine (including front-mid)
|
