F*I
发帖数: 68 | 1 本来所有的人都是Salary based, 最近突然大部分的人改成了Hourly based.
大家能否分析一下会是什么原因? |
d****n
发帖数: 12461 | 2 contractor性质，小时工资开得高，公司不用负责保险和其他福利，税自己报，401k上
面也可能没有match。对于公司来说可能更省钱，开人也容易一点吧。 |
F*I
发帖数: 68 | 3 公司仍然付保险,match401k. 好象也没有省钱.
变成时薪制开人就容易吗?
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: contractor性质，小时工资开得高，公司不用负责保险和其他福利，税自己报，401k上
: 面也可能没有match。对于公司来说可能更省钱，开人也容易一点吧。
|
C********r
发帖数: 124 | 4 No need to surprise. This is quite common. The advantage is that if you work
over-time, you'll get paid at a higher rate. |
Z*****l
发帖数: 14069 | 5 可能对上面的budget比较容易？
【在 F*I 的大作中提到】
: 本来所有的人都是Salary based, 最近突然大部分的人改成了Hourly based.
: 大家能否分析一下会是什么原因?
|
F*I
发帖数: 68 | 6 From employees' side, it doesn't damage any existing benefits, plus it gives
chances to increase income. But for employer, what do they gain by doing
this?
work
【在 C********r 的大作中提到】
: No need to surprise. This is quite common. The advantage is that if you work
: over-time, you'll get paid at a higher rate.
|
F*I
发帖数: 68 | 7 是小公司,就老板说了算.
【在 Z*****l 的大作中提到】
: 可能对上面的budget比较容易？
|
Z*****l
发帖数: 14069 | 8 w2改发1099？
gives
【在 F*I 的大作中提到】
: From employees' side, it doesn't damage any existing benefits, plus it gives
: chances to increase income. But for employer, what do they gain by doing
: this?
:
: work
|
B*****g
发帖数: 34098 | 9 这个是降福利的开始，我猜的
gives
【在 F*I 的大作中提到】
: From employees' side, it doesn't damage any existing benefits, plus it gives
: chances to increase income. But for employer, what do they gain by doing
: this?
:
: work
|
k***a
发帖数: 1104 | 10 salary based 不是只有contractor 才是。 non exempt 也是salary based. 不知道不
要胡扯。 |
k***a
发帖数: 1104 | |
k***a
发帖数: 1104 | 12 hourly based 不是只有contractor 才是。 non exempt 也是hourly based. 不知道不
要胡扯。 |
m****e
发帖数: 139 | 13 was told this by a HR person. not sure if it is true.
if a company expects full workload for the next time period (a year, a few
years, a few months, depending on job type), it is cheaper to "buy out" an
employee's time, i.e., put him/her on salary; otherwise, cheaper to pay by-
the-hour (no work == no pay).
of course this does not apply if there is a dominant pay-type (salary or
hourly) of that particular industry/position. |
g*******2
发帖数: 651 | 14 For salary based employee, the company has to hire you as full time (not
less than 40 hrs/wk).
For hourly based employee, the company does not have that obligation. You
can be hired as part time.
As I know, there is no impact regarding the insurance and 401k, etc. |
