n**e
发帖数: 2026 | 1 首先我要指出你一再回避我对你反驳。你的上一次回帖全文如下：
there are actually many circumstantial evidence for Sun's involvement,
including her own emails years later. on the other hand, there is
no data to prove what you said about her sister's death is true, in fact, it
would be
strange why her parents did not do anything about it if it is.
其中有四点，
1.there are actually many circumstantial evidence for Sun's involvement
2.there is no data to prove what you said about her sister's death is true,
3.including her own emails years later
4.in fact, itwould bestrange why her parents did not do anything about it if
it is.
对你的123点我有针对性驳斥，你不会看不见。我可以再总结一下。第一点是胡编，本
文就是证明你所谓的旁征不成立。第二点是瞎扯，面对这些吴今被杀的旁证，你闭上眼
睛说不存在。第三点是非法非理性。
我不开玩笑，故意不回答你的第四点就是想看看你的反应。你还是不敢涉及任何关于证
据的具体问题。这表明你不是在寻找真相，而是在混淆真相，无法混淆就回避真相。
现在回答你的两个问题。
1.if there are so many suspicious things surrounding
Wu's death, how come her parent didn't say or do
anything? where did you get it in the first place?
2. if Zhu was closing in on her sister's murderer,
how come she didn't say or write anything about it? not even
to her parents?
第一，你不知道吴今父母说什么做什么不等于他们什么也没有说什么也没有做。
第二，即使真的他们没有说也没有做，并不证明吴今就真的是自己掉下去摔死的。可能
因为他们一辈人有隐情，不敢说。也可能因为说什么做什么的也没有用，因为司法调查
的权利在公安手里。公安结论就是结案。
同样的逻辑可以回答你的第二个问题。你不知道朱令说什么写什么不等于她什么也没有
说什么也没有写。即使她什么也没有说什么也没有写，不等于她什么也没有做。如果是
我，我一定会怀疑吴今的死亡原因。一定会去查。 |
|
