S*****S
发帖数: 2 | 1 与其闹哄哄地吵，不如常规途径解决。官方定性以后，违法就追究，不违法大家也可以
散了。不要说什么孤儿寡母，对作恶者的纵容，就是对善良者的残忍。如果有文采好的
同胞能够写一份致捐赠者书，详述此事件来龙去脉，非常感谢。
此邮件可提交FBI，IRS，搜到的charity fraud report的等等部门，比如以下链接：
http://www.ic3.gov/contact/default.aspx
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to inquire about whether an event happened in March, 2013 could
be defined as charity fraud according to the law.
On March 8th, March 9th and March 14th, an ID called lilykang (real name:
Lei Kang) began to post on the biggest Chinese community discussion forum in
United States (www.mitbbs.com), saying that her husband Yin Yu just passed
by because of gastric cancer. She stated that she was a full-time housewife
with three children. She claimed that she had life hardship: her elder son
had autism, and her younger daughter was only two years old. Her posts
aroused a lot of sympathy and bless on the forum at that time. Then she
posted donation information (P.O. Box, paypal and bank account) in one of
her posts, saying that a lot of people sent her messages to ask the donation
information. Later, an organization called American Chinese Culture and
Education Foundation (ACCEF) get involved http://www.accef.net/ to encourage people to donate through their website to save tax. Many kind American Chinese people made donations to this family through different ways in March 2013. Without disclosing her financial situation, she even collected donations from Fudan University Department of Physics in China which raised at least 200000 Chinese RMB (around USD$30000) from alumni and even students.
In April, 2013, the situation turn around sharply. Some insiders disclosed
that Lei Kang's husband Yin Yu is a senior engineer in a big US
telecommunication company (Qualcomm), and she can have over one million
dollars after her husband passed by (company compensation, life insurance,
her husband's stock account, etc). As more and more information was
disclosed, people knew that her son's autism was diagnosed by herself, not
by a medical doctor. In July, 2013, after three months of her husband's
death, Lei Kang purchased a single house in San Diego with full cash $540,
000. Moreover, Lei Kang was found to be a member of the donation
organization ACCEF, and then ACCEF is found to be unregistered. What make
people even angry is, up to now, Lei Kang, as well as ACCEF, refused to make
the total donation amount public, even to the donators.
Could you kindly tell us whether this event can be characterized as charity
fraud? If yes, how could we contact the related people to launch
investigation on both Lei Kang and the organization ACCEF? What kind of
evidence we should collect?
Thanks in advance for your time and information.
Best Regards, |
m****o
发帖数: 1127 | 2 猴妈呢，尿遁了
could
in
【在 S*****S 的大作中提到】
: 与其闹哄哄地吵，不如常规途径解决。官方定性以后，违法就追究，不违法大家也可以
: 散了。不要说什么孤儿寡母，对作恶者的纵容，就是对善良者的残忍。如果有文采好的
: 同胞能够写一份致捐赠者书，详述此事件来龙去脉，非常感谢。
: 此邮件可提交FBI，IRS，搜到的charity fraud report的等等部门，比如以下链接：
: http://www.ic3.gov/contact/default.aspx
: Dear Sir/Madam,
: I am writing to inquire about whether an event happened in March, 2013 could
: be defined as charity fraud according to the law.
: On March 8th, March 9th and March 14th, an ID called lilykang (real name:
: Lei Kang) began to post on the biggest Chinese community discussion forum in
|
l******o
发帖数: 8344 | 3 有一个技术问题，她儿子的自闭症有10来年的IEF 跟踪文件，不是她自己说的
could
in
【在 S*****S 的大作中提到】
: 与其闹哄哄地吵，不如常规途径解决。官方定性以后，违法就追究，不违法大家也可以
: 散了。不要说什么孤儿寡母，对作恶者的纵容，就是对善良者的残忍。如果有文采好的
: 同胞能够写一份致捐赠者书，详述此事件来龙去脉，非常感谢。
: 此邮件可提交FBI，IRS，搜到的charity fraud report的等等部门，比如以下链接：
: http://www.ic3.gov/contact/default.aspx
: Dear Sir/Madam,
: I am writing to inquire about whether an event happened in March, 2013 could
: be defined as charity fraud according to the law.
: On March 8th, March 9th and March 14th, an ID called lilykang (real name:
: Lei Kang) began to post on the biggest Chinese community discussion forum in
|
l******o
发帖数: 8344 | 4 另外，信件不够完整， 请吧bbs上康黑们的喷粪加上，律师应该可以追求这些人要求他
们赔康妈精神损失费用 |
l******o
发帖数: 8344 | 5 对了，我怎么能提醒你们这一点呢，我太傻了，要不，你们这个属于诬告，没有身份的
，就可以是Misdemeador, 递解出境了。
【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: 有一个技术问题，她儿子的自闭症有10来年的IEF 跟踪文件，不是她自己说的
:
: could
: in
|
n****m
发帖数: 1283 | 6 I think the key point that whether the charity fund is legal for charity
matching or tax return should be mentioned as well. That is what ACCEF
advertised.
I modified slightly.
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to inquire about whether an event happened in March, 2013 could
be defined as charity fraud according to the law.
On March 8th, March 9th and March 14th, an ID called lilykang (real name:
Lei Kang) began to post on the biggest Chinese community discussion forum in
United States (www.mitbbs.com), saying that her husband Yin Yu just passed
by because of gastric cancer. She stated that she was a full-time housewife
with three children. She claimed that she had life hardship: her elder son
had autism, and her younger daughter was only two years old. Her posts
aroused a lot of sympathy and bless on the forum at that time. Then she
posted donation information (P.O. Box, paypal and bank account) in one of
her posts, saying that a lot of people sent her messages to ask the donation
information. Later, an organization called American Chinese Culture and
Education Foundation (ACCEF) get involved http://www.accef.net/ to encourage people to donate through their website. ACCEF claimed that the donation is qualified for charity match and tax deductible. Many kind American Chinese people made donations to this family through different ways in March 2013. Without disclosing her financial situation, she even collected donations from Fudan University Department of Physics in China which raised at least 2000000 Chinese RMB (around USD$30000) from alumni and even students.
In April, 2013, the situation turn around sharply. It was disclosed
that Lei Kang's husband Yin Yu was a senior engineer in a large US
telecommunication company (Qualcomm), and she will receive over one million
dollars as a survivor (company compensation, life insurance,
her husband's stock account, etc).Moreover,ACCEF is an unregistered charity
fund. What make
people even angry is, up to now, Lei Kang, as well as ACCEF, refused to make
the total donation amount public, not even to the donators.
Could you kindly tell us whether the donation is legal and qualifed for tax
deduction and whether his event can be characterized as charity fraud? If
yes, how could we contact the related people to launch investigation on both
Lei Kang and the organization ACCEF? What kind of evidence we should
collect?
Thanks in advance for your time and information.
Best Regards,
could
in
【在 S*****S 的大作中提到】
: 与其闹哄哄地吵，不如常规途径解决。官方定性以后，违法就追究，不违法大家也可以
: 散了。不要说什么孤儿寡母，对作恶者的纵容，就是对善良者的残忍。如果有文采好的
: 同胞能够写一份致捐赠者书，详述此事件来龙去脉，非常感谢。
: 此邮件可提交FBI，IRS，搜到的charity fraud report的等等部门，比如以下链接：
: http://www.ic3.gov/contact/default.aspx
: Dear Sir/Madam,
: I am writing to inquire about whether an event happened in March, 2013 could
: be defined as charity fraud according to the law.
: On March 8th, March 9th and March 14th, an ID called lilykang (real name:
: Lei Kang) began to post on the biggest Chinese community discussion forum in
|
c*******2
发帖数: 872 | 7 赞态度认真!!!!
could
in
【在 n****m 的大作中提到】
: I think the key point that whether the charity fund is legal for charity
: matching or tax return should be mentioned as well. That is what ACCEF
: advertised.
: I modified slightly.
: Dear Sir/Madam,
: I am writing to inquire about whether an event happened in March, 2013 could
: be defined as charity fraud according to the law.
: On March 8th, March 9th and March 14th, an ID called lilykang (real name:
: Lei Kang) began to post on the biggest Chinese community discussion forum in
: United States (www.mitbbs.com), saying that her husband Yin Yu just passed
|
d*****8
发帖数: 101 | 8 小改了一丁点。把主观情绪拿掉了。发信的同学可自行斟酌。
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to inquire about whether an event happened in March, 2013 could
be defined as charity fraud according to the law.
On March 8th, March 9th and March 14th, an ID called lilykang (real name:
Lei Kang) began to post on the biggest Chinese community discussion forum in
United States (www.mitbbs.com), saying that her husband Yin Yu just passed
away because of gastric cancer. She stated that she was a full-time
housewife with three children. She claimed that she had a financial crisis
and needed rescue: her eldest son had autism, and her newly born daughter
was less than two years old. Her posts aroused a lot of sympathy and
attention on the forum at that time. Shortly afterwards, she
posted donation information (P.O. Box and paypal account) in one of
her posts on www.mitbbs.com, claiming that hundreds of readers of her
previous post had sent her requests for donation methods. Several days later
, an organization called American Chinese Culture and Education Foundation (
ACCEF) got involved http://www.accef.net/ to encourage people to donate through their website to get tax benefit and to qualify for potential dollar-to-dollar matches from QualComm. Many kind American Chinese people made donations to this family through different ways in the following months in 2013. Without disclosing her financial situation, Ms Kang even collected foreign donations from Department of Physics at Fudan University in Shanghai, China. The amount raised abroad at Fudan was later on released to be at least 200,000 Chinese RMB (around USD$30,000). Ms Kang refused to release the total amount collected within the United States.
In April, 2013, some informants disclosed that Ms Kang's husband Yin Yu,
being a senior engineer in one of the biggest telecommunication companies (
Qualcomm), had left Ms Kang over one million dollars (company compensation,
life insurance, stock account, 401K, etc). As
more and more information was disclosed, people started to question whether
her son's autism was diagnosed by a medical doctor. At least the amount of
social security survivor benefit Ms Kang is receiving suggested not. In July
, 2013, after three months of her husband's death, Lei Kang purchased a
single family house, her second property in San Diego County, with a price
of $540,000 and no financing. Moreover, both Lei Kang and her late husband
were found to be members of the donation organization ACCEF. ACCEF is
confirmed to be unregistered with the California government and could be
falsely advertising tax and match benefits for donations to Ms Kang.
Could you kindly tell us whether this combined act of Ms Kang and ACCEF can
be characterized as charity fraud? If yes, how could I contact the
authority or law enforcement to launch investigations on both Lei Kang and
the organization ACCEF? What supporting evidence should I collect?
Thanks in advance for your time and information.
Best Regards, |
d*****8
发帖数: 101 | 9 ls的同学，不能回你短信。你的问题很好。问一下大家怎样想？
Who are "we"? Shall we use "I" instead individually? |
l*****6
发帖数: 332 | 10 楼上的这位改得真好，技术贴要顶！
我也觉得用I比较好，比较specific，不代表任何人，只是一个普通人对此事件的关心。 |
|
|
K**********i
发帖数: 22099 | 11 你咋啥都知道?
铊儿子才12岁，就有10多年的跟踪文件了？ 别告诉我15年的文件？
【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: 有一个技术问题，她儿子的自闭症有10来年的IEF 跟踪文件，不是她自己说的
:
: could
: in
|
c*******2
发帖数: 872 | 12 我觉得应该是I,因为人家会质疑那么这个we是个什么单位呢?
署名可是anonymous.
【在 d*****8 的大作中提到】
: ls的同学，不能回你短信。你的问题很好。问一下大家怎样想？
: Who are "we"? Shall we use "I" instead individually?
|
n****m
发帖数: 1283 | 13 I would say "I"
For IRS, tax is the key point. Whether ACCEF or the "Yin family fund" is
legal for tax deduction.
For FBI, charity felony is the key point. Keep all the evidence! Keep the
webpages!
【在 d*****8 的大作中提到】
: ls的同学，不能回你短信。你的问题很好。问一下大家怎样想？
: Who are "we"? Shall we use "I" instead individually?
|
l*****6
发帖数: 332 | 14 捐款的信息全都删了，网友保存的，转发的可以算证据吗？最好能找到通过ACCEF捐款
的同胞。 |
K**********i
发帖数: 22099 | |
m****o
发帖数: 1127 | 16 你昨天的退款凭证难道不算？
【在 l*****6 的大作中提到】
: 捐款的信息全都删了，网友保存的，转发的可以算证据吗？最好能找到通过ACCEF捐款
: 的同胞。
|
n****m
发帖数: 1283 | 17 Once the case is established. FBI would make banks to provide transaction
records.
However, if someone has preserved the webpages. It would help to pin them
down.
【在 l*****6 的大作中提到】
: 捐款的信息全都删了，网友保存的，转发的可以算证据吗？最好能找到通过ACCEF捐款
: 的同胞。
|
u****q
发帖数: 24345 | |
n****m
发帖数: 1283 | 19 Have you received the email about how to get company match and tax deduction?
【在 l*****6 的大作中提到】
: 捐款的信息全都删了，网友保存的，转发的可以算证据吗？最好能找到通过ACCEF捐款
: 的同胞。
|
d*****8
发帖数: 101 | 20
至少IRS会。
【在 u****q 的大作中提到】
: 拜托，匿名举报会有人看吗？
|
|
|
l*****6
发帖数: 332 | 21 我没有通过ACCEF捐，是paypal捐的，而且退款了也可以吗？
【在 m****o 的大作中提到】
: 你昨天的退款凭证难道不算？
|
c*******2
发帖数: 872 | 22 看有多少了, 如果有很多信, 不见的不看的.....
【在 u****q 的大作中提到】
: 拜托，匿名举报会有人看吗？
|
l*****6
发帖数: 332 | 23 No, I just saw lilikang's posts on mitbbs, and donate through paypal.
deduction?
【在 n****m 的大作中提到】
: Have you received the email about how to get company match and tax deduction?
|
w*****n
发帖数: 368 | 24 记得署名，不署名人家把你当个P放掉。很简单fbi，irs要找你取证，不留名人找谁去。
小心别扔出去一坨那什么砸到自己头上。去google一下什么叫frivolous lawsuit。fbi
irs你家开的让你玩的？
could
in
【在 S*****S 的大作中提到】
: 与其闹哄哄地吵，不如常规途径解决。官方定性以后，违法就追究，不违法大家也可以
: 散了。不要说什么孤儿寡母，对作恶者的纵容，就是对善良者的残忍。如果有文采好的
: 同胞能够写一份致捐赠者书，详述此事件来龙去脉，非常感谢。
: 此邮件可提交FBI，IRS，搜到的charity fraud report的等等部门，比如以下链接：
: http://www.ic3.gov/contact/default.aspx
: Dear Sir/Madam,
: I am writing to inquire about whether an event happened in March, 2013 could
: be defined as charity fraud according to the law.
: On March 8th, March 9th and March 14th, an ID called lilykang (real name:
: Lei Kang) began to post on the biggest Chinese community discussion forum in
|
z****l
发帖数: 5282 | 25 找人proof read你的英文吧。
比如 pass by -> pass away
许多地方应该用过去时。一些地方应该用第三人称。
Single House -> Single Family House
...
could
in
passed
housewife
donation
make
charity
【在 S*****S 的大作中提到】
: 与其闹哄哄地吵，不如常规途径解决。官方定性以后，违法就追究，不违法大家也可以
: 散了。不要说什么孤儿寡母，对作恶者的纵容，就是对善良者的残忍。如果有文采好的
: 同胞能够写一份致捐赠者书，详述此事件来龙去脉，非常感谢。
: 此邮件可提交FBI，IRS，搜到的charity fraud report的等等部门，比如以下链接：
: http://www.ic3.gov/contact/default.aspx
: Dear Sir/Madam,
: I am writing to inquire about whether an event happened in March, 2013 could
: be defined as charity fraud according to the law.
: On March 8th, March 9th and March 14th, an ID called lilykang (real name:
: Lei Kang) began to post on the biggest Chinese community discussion forum in
|
m****o
发帖数: 1127 | 26 应该可以，结合Email就是最有力的证据
btw我只是灌水的，对于法律，募捐都不懂
【在 l*****6 的大作中提到】
: No, I just saw lilikang's posts on mitbbs, and donate through paypal.
:
: deduction?
|
K**********i
发帖数: 22099 | 27 围观法盲~~~~
我是非法移民，我都报过案，匿名的。
去。
fbi
【在 w*****n 的大作中提到】
: 记得署名，不署名人家把你当个P放掉。很简单fbi，irs要找你取证，不留名人找谁去。
: 小心别扔出去一坨那什么砸到自己头上。去google一下什么叫frivolous lawsuit。fbi
: irs你家开的让你玩的？
:
: could
: in
|
l*****6
发帖数: 332 | 28 这个好像还没上升到lawsuit吧，只是定性一下他们那么做是否违规。
去。
fbi
【在 w*****n 的大作中提到】
: 记得署名，不署名人家把你当个P放掉。很简单fbi，irs要找你取证，不留名人找谁去。
: 小心别扔出去一坨那什么砸到自己头上。去google一下什么叫frivolous lawsuit。fbi
: irs你家开的让你玩的？
:
: could
: in
|
w********o
发帖数: 155 | 29 虽然文章写的没什么错，但是还是不要把km逼地太狠了，毕竟人家要带三个娃，还是km
出来认个错吧，大家就散了 |
H**J
发帖数: 690 | 30 别听他的，不用署名，匿名举报就可以了，加州政府受理这一类fraud都是不要求实名
的。
去。
fbi
【在 w*****n 的大作中提到】
: 记得署名，不署名人家把你当个P放掉。很简单fbi，irs要找你取证，不留名人找谁去。
: 小心别扔出去一坨那什么砸到自己头上。去google一下什么叫frivolous lawsuit。fbi
: irs你家开的让你玩的？
:
: could
: in
|
|
|
t****r
发帖数: 203 | 31 威胁？
【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: 对了，我怎么能提醒你们这一点呢，我太傻了，要不，你们这个属于诬告，没有身份的
: ，就可以是Misdemeador, 递解出境了。
|
w*****n
发帖数: 368 | 32 你懂JBM。匿名理论上可以。可是人执法机构人都给没事干的匿名SB消遣的吗？你不暑
名不show一点sincerity谁当你个P？你提议你不举证谁来帮你？要给人耍了执法机构找
谁算帐去？所以你这种信人直接recycle。
都麻痹象那什么会叫不敢咬，还只敢在网上叫。祖宗的脸都给你们丢尽了。
【在 H**J 的大作中提到】
: 别听他的，不用署名，匿名举报就可以了，加州政府受理这一类fraud都是不要求实名
: 的。
:
: 去。
: fbi
|
l*****6
发帖数: 332 | 33 我身边已经有两位朋友实名询问了，呵呵。
【在 w*****n 的大作中提到】
: 你懂JBM。匿名理论上可以。可是人执法机构人都给没事干的匿名SB消遣的吗？你不暑
: 名不show一点sincerity谁当你个P？你提议你不举证谁来帮你？要给人耍了执法机构找
: 谁算帐去？所以你这种信人直接recycle。
: 都麻痹象那什么会叫不敢咬，还只敢在网上叫。祖宗的脸都给你们丢尽了。
|
w*****n
发帖数: 368 | 34 强力欢迎提供follow－up。
【在 l*****6 的大作中提到】
: 我身边已经有两位朋友实名询问了，呵呵。
|
w****r
发帖数: 17566 | 35 single family house, not single house
could
in
【在 S*****S 的大作中提到】
: 与其闹哄哄地吵，不如常规途径解决。官方定性以后，违法就追究，不违法大家也可以
: 散了。不要说什么孤儿寡母，对作恶者的纵容，就是对善良者的残忍。如果有文采好的
: 同胞能够写一份致捐赠者书，详述此事件来龙去脉，非常感谢。
: 此邮件可提交FBI，IRS，搜到的charity fraud report的等等部门，比如以下链接：
: http://www.ic3.gov/contact/default.aspx
: Dear Sir/Madam,
: I am writing to inquire about whether an event happened in March, 2013 could
: be defined as charity fraud according to the law.
: On March 8th, March 9th and March 14th, an ID called lilykang (real name:
: Lei Kang) began to post on the biggest Chinese community discussion forum in
|
l*****6
发帖数: 332 | 36 他们是通过BBB这个链接里面“report it to BBB Report a Scam.”投诉的，follow-
up可能要下周才有。
http://www.bbb.org/us/article/bbb-warns-of-charity-scams-offers
【在 w*****n 的大作中提到】
: 强力欢迎提供follow－up。
|
K**********i
发帖数: 22099 | 37 啊丫丫丫丫丫丫
我好怕怕呀
【在 t****r 的大作中提到】
: 威胁？
|
l*****6
发帖数: 332 | 38 下面dnmt008改写的版本要好很多。
【在 w****r 的大作中提到】
: single family house, not single house
:
: could
: in
|
d******a
发帖数: 150 | 39 昨天还被你写的东西感动，看来他妈的都是假的。你比那些康黑更坏。
【在 l*****6 的大作中提到】
: 我身边已经有两位朋友实名询问了，呵呵。
|
S*****S
发帖数: 2 | 40 已经重新贴模板了，谢谢。
【在 w****r 的大作中提到】
: single family house, not single house
:
: could
: in
|
|
|
d******a
发帖数: 150 | 41 娶了你这样的老婆，怪不得你老公只能做一辈子博后。
【在 l*****6 的大作中提到】
: 下面dnmt008改写的版本要好很多。
|
J****S
发帖数: 1591 | 42 曾经的捐款网站，各种捐款方式，鼓励长期捐款，供参考，以前存的截图
【在 l*****6 的大作中提到】
: 捐款的信息全都删了，网友保存的，转发的可以算证据吗？最好能找到通过ACCEF捐款
: 的同胞。
|
d******a
发帖数: 150 | 43 劝你们别盯着尹的照片看， 晚上要做噩梦的。。。。。。 |
l*****6
发帖数: 332 | |
J****S
发帖数: 1591 | 45 吓唬谁啊，医生世家，再说康粉的标准套路早就见识过了
【在 d******a 的大作中提到】
: 劝你们别盯着尹的照片看， 晚上要做噩梦的。。。。。。
|
A********e
发帖数: 535 | 46 I have that
I just found it by chance. In the way I would like to say thanks to the
those people who are keeping their eyes on me. Without you I could not find
those.
deduction?
【在 n****m 的大作中提到】
: Have you received the email about how to get company match and tax deduction?
|
l*****6
发帖数: 332 | |
x****o
发帖数: 29677 | 48 FBI都上来了，牛鼻，支持康黑去白宫门口抗议请愿 |
C**********r
发帖数: 8189 | 49 支持转华人。
【在 l*****6 的大作中提到】
: 这个帖子好啊，信息量大，有人帮忙转华人了吗？
|
