B********e
发帖数: 397 | 1 你们这帮暴民人肉小孩， 还有讨论谋杀孙和她的同学们！ 你们快赶上俄州的绑架三个
女孩的绑架强奸犯了！ |
z********1
发帖数: 997 | 2 放屁。孙鉈站在权力高处，犯下滔天罪行现在还缩头乌龟，这你不管， 你他妈的倒是
管人肉几个嫌疑人的小孩。 什么居心？ 人肉的小孩在这里根本不是主要矛盾。你不用
来混淆视听了。以为别人和你一样傻。 |
B********e
发帖数: 397 | 3 晒暴民。
【在 z********1 的大作中提到】
: 放屁。孙鉈站在权力高处，犯下滔天罪行现在还缩头乌龟，这你不管， 你他妈的倒是
: 管人肉几个嫌疑人的小孩。 什么居心？ 人肉的小孩在这里根本不是主要矛盾。你不用
: 来混淆视听了。以为别人和你一样傻。
|
H*******g
发帖数: 6997 | 4 你楼上就是。祝他/她出门被鸡奸/强奸。
【在 B********e 的大作中提到】
: 晒暴民。
|
H*******g
发帖数: 6997 | 5 你是什么居心？小孩就不是人？你是人吗？不如我去人肉你，然后把你所有隐私都给曝
光了如何?
【在 z********1 的大作中提到】
: 放屁。孙鉈站在权力高处，犯下滔天罪行现在还缩头乌龟，这你不管， 你他妈的倒是
: 管人肉几个嫌疑人的小孩。 什么居心？ 人肉的小孩在这里根本不是主要矛盾。你不用
: 来混淆视听了。以为别人和你一样傻。
|
y*****y
发帖数: 1208 | 6 Okay, don't blow the sh1t out of proportion. Give the issue some context and
put the debate in perspective - We are talking about - losing someone's
privacy vs. losing someone's 19 years of youth and the rest of decent life.
What's more devastating? |
J*********4
发帖数: 1274 | 7 来，请朱令案被人肉的受害者正式起诉暴民~~~
赶紧的~~~这么人神共愤的罪行~~~我第一个支持哦~~~
^_^ |
t*******e
发帖数: 1511 | 8 人肉小孩是对的，谁也不想自己的孩子和他在一个学校， 自己的孩子太优秀会有危险
的。 |
k****s
发帖数: 7334 | 9 铊妇们毒害朱令父母的女儿就高尚了么..
既然铊妇逃过了, 母债子还也是中国几千年传统呢 |
i******c
发帖数: 9350 | 10 lz's topic is about moral standard. Your statement is saying that innocent
child deserved to be exposed because ZL lost her 19 years, in this case your
moral standard is equally low. I have to question your motive, do you
really care about ZL?
and
.
【在 y*****y 的大作中提到】
: Okay, don't blow the sh1t out of proportion. Give the issue some context and
: put the debate in perspective - We are talking about - losing someone's
: privacy vs. losing someone's 19 years of youth and the rest of decent life.
: What's more devastating?
|
y*****y
发帖数: 1208 | 11 I have already pointed out your logical errors in the other post.
You are stretching your arguments, my friend. I didn't say it's the right
thing to do to expose their child info online. But the harm/damage of losing
their child privacy is no way compared to the loss of 19 years of youth.
Do you agree with this point?
It is not conversely true, as you stated, "because ZL lost 19 years of her
best life, that innocent child must be exposed on the internet to the public
". Your logic is flawed. In fact, based on the damage, if you really insist
to equate the two, then poisoning the child would be equivalent in terms of
the damage, not just losing privacy.
innocent
your
【在 i******c 的大作中提到】
: lz's topic is about moral standard. Your statement is saying that innocent
: child deserved to be exposed because ZL lost her 19 years, in this case your
: moral standard is equally low. I have to question your motive, do you
: really care about ZL?
:
: and
: .
|
d********8
发帖数: 167 | 12 支持人肉,还要人肉铊党全家!大家不要懈怠,电子邮件群发,facebook,qq,扩散扩散再扩
散,让铊党永世不得安身! |
