S********n
发帖数: 107 | | n*****n
发帖数: 1634 | 2 朝正确的方向努力不会错的，你不知道20年以后什么政治气候，
再说不定过几天他老公就把她办了
【在 S********n 的大作中提到】
: 土共又没能力在外国对外国公民执法
| n****d
发帖数: 2241 | | g**g
发帖数: 1121 | 4 当然有用，查清真相，民事案就告到她倾家荡产。所有和中国有引渡协议的国家和地区
都不能去。而且，查清真相，知会美国移民局，她的公民身份就可能被撤销，然后不用
我说了吧。
The Immigration and Naturalization Service has authority to
institute either administrative or judicial proceedings to denaturalize
citizens whose criminal convictions disqualified them from citizenship as a
matter of law. Whether the proceedings are administrative or judicial, the
INS must establish the allegations in its complaint by clear, unequivocal,
and convincing evidence.
The INS has no authority to seek denaturalization if the INS examiner
had discretion to find that an applicant was of good moral character, and in
fact did exercise that discretion so as to find that the applicant was of
good moral character, unless the INS establishes in its complaint by clear,
unequivocal, and convincing evidence either that the applicant gave false
testimony with the intention of obtaining an immigration benefit or that the
examiner's decision resulted from the applicant's willful misrepresentation
or concealment of a material fact.
The INS may seek denaturalization if the applicant made a false oral
statement under oath (regardless of whether the testimony is material) with
the subjective intent of obtaining immigration benefits. Alternatively, the
INS may seek denaturalization if the applicant procured naturalization by
concealment or willful misrepresentation of a material fact. In either case,
the INS must prove its complaint by clear, unequivocal, and convincing
evidence.
【在 S********n 的大作中提到】
: 土共又没能力在外国对外国公民执法
|
|
