w****a
发帖数: 12 | 1 We found a paper published on Plos pathogens (IF: 9.4), all the data were
photoshoped, I have no idea who is Tan Jinquan, but he has several good
papers such as J Immunol and cancer research, now I have to suspect all the
data are real or fraud, please discuss what do you think (see below) and if
it is true, we should kick out him from Wuhan University
EBV Promotes Human CD8+ NKT Cell Development
He Yuling, Xiao Ruijing, Ji Xiang, Li Li, Chen Lang, Xiong Jie, Xiao Wei,
Wang Yujuan, Zhang Lijun, | t**s
发帖数: 4026 | 2 would u give some evidence? thx
the
if
【在 w****a 的大作中提到】
: We found a paper published on Plos pathogens (IF: 9.4), all the data were
: photoshoped, I have no idea who is Tan Jinquan, but he has several good
: papers such as J Immunol and cancer research, now I have to suspect all the
: data are real or fraud, please discuss what do you think (see below) and if
: it is true, we should kick out him from Wuhan University
: EBV Promotes Human CD8+ NKT Cell Development
: He Yuling, Xiao Ruijing, Ji Xiang, Li Li, Chen Lang, Xiong Jie, Xiao Wei,
: Wang Yujuan, Zhang Lijun,
| w****a
发帖数: 12 | 3 Look at Fig 8 carefully, every single FACS would be defferent theoretically,
however, many dots from different FACS so identical, it cannot be true.
what I believe is that they add more dots in some, and erase some from
others, but unfortunatelly was not well done. Fig 7 has same problem, other
figures however didnot show the raw data then cannot tell.
take a look at following link, and tell me what is your opinions
http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.ppat.100091 | B*******t
发帖数: 403 | | t**s
发帖数: 4026 | 5 不太懂,等懂得来说
theoretically,
other
【在 w****a 的大作中提到】
: Look at Fig 8 carefully, every single FACS would be defferent theoretically,
: however, many dots from different FACS so identical, it cannot be true.
: what I believe is that they add more dots in some, and erase some from
: others, but unfortunatelly was not well done. Fig 7 has same problem, other
: figures however didnot show the raw data then cannot tell.
: take a look at following link, and tell me what is your opinions
: http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.ppat.100091
| w***a
发帖数: 4361 | 6 agree,看来得普及和提高photoshop技术。
theoretically,
other
【在 w****a 的大作中提到】
: Look at Fig 8 carefully, every single FACS would be defferent theoretically,
: however, many dots from different FACS so identical, it cannot be true.
: what I believe is that they add more dots in some, and erase some from
: others, but unfortunatelly was not well done. Fig 7 has same problem, other
: figures however didnot show the raw data then cannot tell.
: take a look at following link, and tell me what is your opinions
: http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.ppat.100091
| w******d
发帖数: 46 | 7 I agree with LZ. Although figure 7 is just to show the gating so it's OK to
be similar, the dots in figure 8 shouldn't be in same pattern if they are
from different FACS.
I would recommend LZ to write to Plos pathogen and ask about it.
It looks like the journal have noticed the problem |
|
