j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 1 New York Times issues embarrassing correction after botching story attacking
Trump’s tax plan
The New York Times issued an embarrassing correction after a report that
attacked President Donald Trump’s recently passed tax plan got the numbers
about as wrong as could be.
The lengthy Feb. 23 feature, headlined, “Get to Know the New Tax Code While
Filling Out This Year's 1040,” sought to detail how Trump’s tax plan
would hurt middle-class families. A hypothetical couple -- christened Sam
and Felicity Taxpayer -- would see their tax bill rise by nearly $4,000,
according to the story.
Then came the correction saying the family would actually see taxes go down.
The Wall Street Journal’s James Freeman mocked the Times piece before the
Old Gray Lady issued the correction.
“Even perennial tax-increase advocate Warren Buffett is now acknowledging
the economic benefit of the Trump tax cuts, but The New York Times newsroom
still won’t concede the point,” Freeman wrote on Feb. 27. “Will criticism
from a liberal law professor persuade The Times to reconsider?”
Well, The Times did reconsider -- but it may still not be 100 percent
accurate.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/03/08/new-york-times-issues-embarrassing-correction-after-botching-story-attacking-trump-s-tax-plan.html | r******g
发帖数: 4002 | 2 哪一天不造谣？华盛顿邮报和纽约时报已经成为假新闻的龙头了。 | r**********f
发帖数: 2808 | 3 NYT的小编大编数学不好，或者是反老川反上了瘾。当初到美新版浏览一下大家对新税
法的计算，也不会编出新税法middle-class两口子多交税4000的谎言。 | r*********t
发帖数: 4911 | 4 估计是小编文科生，aa进的nyt,数学不好，而审稿的反老床上瘾，不加修改。
【在 r**********f 的大作中提到】
: NYT的小编大编数学不好，或者是反老川反上了瘾。当初到美新版浏览一下大家对新税
: 法的计算，也不会编出新税法middle-class两口子多交税4000的谎言。
|
|
