T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | 1 这俩有作伪证的嫌疑。
Podesta, Wasserman Schultz told Senate Intel they didn't know of dossier
funding: report
Hillary Clinton’s former campaign manager and the former chairwoman of the
Democratic National Committee (DNC) privately denied to congressional
investigators that they knew about funding for a dossier containing
scandalous allegations about President Trump, CNN reported Thursday.
John Podesta, the former campaign manager, and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
(D-Fla.) each said in separate closed-door interviews with the Senate
Intelligence Committee that they did not know who funded an opposition
dossier on Trump. Podesta’s attorney also sat in on the interview,
according to CNN.
http://thehill.com/homenews/357378-podesta-wasserman-schultz-told-senate-intel-they-didnt-know-of-dossier-funding |
s**********u
发帖数: 2749 | 2 国会听证毛用没有。连那个教授都可以从容应对，别说这些老油条政客
the
Schultz
【在 T**********e 的大作中提到】
: 这俩有作伪证的嫌疑。
: Podesta, Wasserman Schultz told Senate Intel they didn't know of dossier
: funding: report
: Hillary Clinton’s former campaign manager and the former chairwoman of the
: Democratic National Committee (DNC) privately denied to congressional
: investigators that they knew about funding for a dossier containing
: scandalous allegations about President Trump, CNN reported Thursday.
: John Podesta, the former campaign manager, and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
: (D-Fla.) each said in separate closed-door interviews with the Senate
: Intelligence Committee that they did not know who funded an opposition
|
T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | 3
哪个教授？
【在 s**********u 的大作中提到】
: 国会听证毛用没有。连那个教授都可以从容应对，别说这些老油条政客
:
: the
: Schultz
|
G*******h
发帖数: 4091 | 4 我也觉得国会听证没啥用，又不能定罪。
话说，啥人啥情况适用国会听证这种形式？一般有犯罪线索不都是警方先查，查完了再
抓再起诉，然后法院审和判。
国会听证完了，要没听出啥来是不是就不让查了？听出问题了也没法发逮捕令是不是？ |
T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | 5
能证明说谎就可以定罪。
Federal law makes it a crime to "knowingly and willfully" give "materially"
false statements to Congress, even if unsworn -- which is not to be confused
with the more general crime of perjury for lying under oath.
The consequences for either crime are serious: one can face up to five years
in prison.
【在 G*******h 的大作中提到】
: 我也觉得国会听证没啥用，又不能定罪。
: 话说，啥人啥情况适用国会听证这种形式？一般有犯罪线索不都是警方先查，查完了再
: 抓再起诉，然后法院审和判。
: 国会听证完了，要没听出啥来是不是就不让查了？听出问题了也没法发逮捕令是不是？
|
G*******h
发帖数: 4091 | 6 证明撒谎要说容易也容易说难也难，谁来证明？国会还是FBI？
希拉里在收到传票后砸服务器都没事，你说还怎么能证明她撒谎了？
"
confused
years
【在 T**********e 的大作中提到】
:
: 能证明说谎就可以定罪。
: Federal law makes it a crime to "knowingly and willfully" give "materially"
: false statements to Congress, even if unsworn -- which is not to be confused
: with the more general crime of perjury for lying under oath.
: The consequences for either crime are serious: one can face up to five years
: in prison.
|
c*c
发帖数: 2983 | 7 老川说他知情manafort干什么了么？flynn打电话给谁了么？
不知情算伪证么 |
T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | 8
证明说谎确实不容易，所以一般政客被问到关键处都是说“我不记得”，留有余地。但
伪证的确是犯罪。希拉里的传票如果只是传她本人没subpoena服务器她是可以砸。
【在 G*******h 的大作中提到】
: 证明撒谎要说容易也容易说难也难，谁来证明？国会还是FBI？
: 希拉里在收到传票后砸服务器都没事，你说还怎么能证明她撒谎了？
:
: "
: confused
: years
|
s**********u
发帖数: 2749 | 9 就是参与设计08医保，说利用选民傻逼来通过那个
【在 T**********e 的大作中提到】
:
: 证明说谎确实不容易，所以一般政客被问到关键处都是说“我不记得”，留有余地。但
: 伪证的确是犯罪。希拉里的传票如果只是传她本人没subpoena服务器她是可以砸。
|
G*******h
发帖数: 4091 | 10 这话有道理。所以国会发传票的时候如果有意或无意的略过服务器不提的话，那这
个传票反而是个毁灭证据的善意提醒了。
【在 T**********e 的大作中提到】
:
: 证明说谎确实不容易，所以一般政客被问到关键处都是说“我不记得”，留有余地。但
: 伪证的确是犯罪。希拉里的传票如果只是传她本人没subpoena服务器她是可以砸。
|
