T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | 1 Why Trump’s Ban on Transgender Servicepeople Is Flatly Unconstitutional
President Donald Trump’s tweets Wednesday morning proclaiming that no
transgender persons should be allowed “to serve in any capacity in the U.S.
military” do not have the force of law, and maybe nothing like them ever
will. But if the president were to put that edict in an executive order
rather than a tweet, the policy it purported to institute would be flatly
unconstitutional. As stated, a wall-to-wall ban on transgender Americans in
the armed forces could only be understood as rooted in what constitutional
doctrine calls animus: that is, the bare dislike of a group of people. And
as the Supreme Court has held in cases going back at least to the 1970s,
animus is never a constitutionally valid reason for government action.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/26/why-trumps-ban-on-transgender-servicepeople-is-flatly-unconstitutional-215423 |
r*********t
发帖数: 4911 | 2 厉害了，14年才放宽的变性人参军，到现在说违宪了。那军队的征兵医疗标准也是赤裸
裸的违宪了。 |
T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | 3
一个重要问题力薄肉不能回答：gender confused是不是病，认为是病军队给手术治疗
，但征兵条例可以排除病态；如果不是病，就别报销手术费了。
【在 r*********t 的大作中提到】
: 厉害了，14年才放宽的变性人参军，到现在说违宪了。那军队的征兵医疗标准也是赤裸
: 裸的违宪了。
|
y****i
发帖数: 12114 | 4 左棍纷纷表示“征兵条例可以排除病态”这本身就是违宪。
左棍质问：病人就不能参军，为啥？病人有一腔热血和一颗爱国的红心，为啥不让参军
？说！为啥？
军方回应：好的，那么就优先派病人上前线的前线并深入敌后，让他们充分报效祖国，
等病人全部光荣后再派其他军人上前线，以充分体现病人先天下之忧而忧的高风亮节和
鞠躬尽瘁死而后已的爱国情怀。
左棍：尼玛！ |
s*******u
发帖数: 2249 | |
f******k
发帖数: 5329 | 6 真他妈烦拿变性人这点屁事儿扯皮。美国到底一共有多少变性人？有多少想当兵的变性
人？你妈美国现在的问题大了去了，根本没功夫在变性人当兵这种事儿上瞎叨叨。我建
议美国另外选个性事总统，让他一个人专门协调同性恋易性癖人事的上厕所，当兵，结
婚等等国家大事，另一个总统就可以专心治理国家了。 |
T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | 7
这是政治的wedge issue，所谓阶级斗争一抓就灵，小布什当年也是猛玩同性结婚，现
在风水轮流转，猪党用lgbtq要把和党往死里干。
【在 f******k 的大作中提到】
: 真他妈烦拿变性人这点屁事儿扯皮。美国到底一共有多少变性人？有多少想当兵的变性
: 人？你妈美国现在的问题大了去了，根本没功夫在变性人当兵这种事儿上瞎叨叨。我建
: 议美国另外选个性事总统，让他一个人专门协调同性恋易性癖人事的上厕所，当兵，结
: 婚等等国家大事，另一个总统就可以专心治理国家了。
|
y****i
发帖数: 12114 | |
l***o
发帖数: 7937 | 9 主流还是赢了。川桶发个推，搅动一池浑水，没人follow up，殊不知已被无声无息地
阉掉了。
S.
in
【在 T**********e 的大作中提到】
: Why Trump’s Ban on Transgender Servicepeople Is Flatly Unconstitutional
: President Donald Trump’s tweets Wednesday morning proclaiming that no
: transgender persons should be allowed “to serve in any capacity in the U.S.
: military” do not have the force of law, and maybe nothing like them ever
: will. But if the president were to put that edict in an executive order
: rather than a tweet, the policy it purported to institute would be flatly
: unconstitutional. As stated, a wall-to-wall ban on transgender Americans in
: the armed forces could only be understood as rooted in what constitutional
: doctrine calls animus: that is, the bare dislike of a group of people. And
: as the Supreme Court has held in cases going back at least to the 1970s,
|
x**8
发帖数: 1939 | 10 Graham说了，we don't change policy based on tweet.
Trump发那推还不如放个屁，连个响都没有，
【在 l***o 的大作中提到】
: 主流还是赢了。川桶发个推，搅动一池浑水，没人follow up，殊不知已被无声无息地
: 阉掉了。
:
: S.
: in
|
x****d
发帖数: 2239 | 11 你在这儿在说什么？
他的tweet 不如...?
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: Graham说了，we don't change policy based on tweet.
: Trump发那推还不如放个屁，连个响都没有，
|
