boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Uber’s C.E.O. Plays With Fire(ZZ)
相关主题
Uber拒绝跟随NYC出租车罢工抗议床铺被抵制
Uber, SpaceX/Tesla, and PepsiCo execs join Trump business c (转载)
暴徒们围攻uber了
多元化行为艺术
希拉里讨论硅谷的多元化和包容性
包容性和多元化成为Uber优先事务
作弊毁掉Uber的10招
黑人议员要求uber雇更多的非白人到管理层
解释了男女报酬不同的最好研究出炉了
这下Ubert被西雅图搞傻比了
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: mr话题: uber话题: kalanick话题: he话题: his
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
d*2
发帖数: 2053
1
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/23/technology/travis-kalanick-pushes-uber-
and-himself-to-the-precipice.html
Travis Kalanick’s drive to win in life has led to
a pattern of risk-taking that has at times put his
ride-hailing company on the brink of implosion.
By MIKE ISAACAPRIL 23, 2017
SAN FRANCISCO — Travis Kalanick, the chief executive of Uber, visited Apple
’s headquarters in early 2015 to meet with Timothy D. Cook, who runs the
iPhone maker. It was a session that Mr. Kalanick was dreading.
For months, Mr. Kalanick had pulled a fast one on Apple by directing his
employees to help camouflage the ride-hailing app from Apple’s engineers.
The reason? So Apple would not find out that Uber had been secretly
identifying and tagging iPhones even after its app had been deleted and the
devices erased — a fraud detection maneuver that violated Apple’s privacy
guidelines.
But Apple was onto the deception, and when Mr. Kalanick arrived at the
midafternoon meeting sporting his favorite pair of bright red sneakers and
hot-pink socks, Mr. Cook was prepared. “So, I’ve heard you’ve been
breaking some of our rules,” Mr. Cook said in his calm, Southern tone. Stop
the trickery, Mr. Cook then demanded, or Uber’s app would be kicked out of
Apple’s App Store.
For Mr. Kalanick, the moment was fraught with tension. If Uber’s app was
yanked from the App Store, it would lose access to millions of iPhone
customers — essentially destroying the ride-hailing company’s business. So
Mr. Kalanick acceded.
In a quest to build Uber into the world’s dominant ride-hailing entity, Mr.
Kalanick has openly disregarded many rules and norms, backing down only
when caught or cornered. He has flouted transportation and safety
regulations, bucked against entrenched competitors and capitalized on legal
loopholes and gray areas to gain a business advantage. In the process, Mr.
Kalanick has helped create a new transportation industry, with Uber
spreading to more than 70 countries and gaining a valuation of nearly $70
billion, and its business continues to grow.
But the previously unreported encounter with Mr. Cook showed how Mr.
Kalanick was also responsible for risk-taking that pushed Uber beyond the
pale, sometimes to the very brink of implosion.
Crossing that line was not a one-off for Mr. Kalanick. According to
interviews with more than 50 current and former Uber employees, investors
and others with whom the executive had personal relationships, Mr. Kalanick,
40, is driven to the point that he must win at whatever he puts his mind to
and at whatever cost — a trait that has now plunged Uber into its most
sustained set of crises since its founding in 2009.
“Travis’s biggest strength is that he will run through a wall to
accomplish his goals,” said Mark Cuban, the Dallas Mavericks owner and
billionaire investor who has mentored Mr. Kalanick. “Travis’s biggest
weakness is that he will run through a wall to accomplish his goals. That’s
the best way to describe him.”
A blindness to boundaries is not uncommon for Silicon Valley entrepreneurs.
But in Mr. Kalanick, that led to a pattern of repeatedly going too far at
Uber, including the duplicity with Apple, sabotaging competitors and
allowing the company to use a secret tool called Greyball to trick some law
enforcement agencies.
That quality also extended to his personal life, where Mr. Kalanick mixes
with celebrities like Jay Z and businessmen including President Trump’s
chief economic adviser, Gary D. Cohn. But it has alienated some Uber
executives, employees and advisers. Mr. Kalanick, with salt-and-pepper hair,
a fast-paced walk and an iPhone practically embedded in his hand, is
described by friends as more at ease with data and numbers (some consider
him a math savant) than with people.
Uber is grappling with the fallout. For the last few months, the company has
been reeling from allegations of a machismo-fueled workplace where managers
routinely overstepped verbally, physically and sometimes sexually with
employees. Mr. Kalanick compounded that image by engaging in a shouting
match with an Uber driver in February, an incident recorded by the driver
and then leaked online. (Mr. Kalanick now has a private driver.)
The damage has been extensive. Uber’s detractors have started a grass-roots
campaign with the hashtag #deleteUber. Executives have streamed out. Some
Uber investors have openly criticized the company.
Mr. Kalanick’s leadership is at a precarious point. While Uber is financed
by a who’s who of investors including Goldman Sachs and Saudi Arabia’s
Public Investment Fund, Mr. Kalanick controls the majority of the company’s
voting shares with a small handful of other close friends, and has stacked
Uber’s board of directors with many who are invested in his success. Yet
board members have concluded that he must change his management style, and
are pressuring him to do so.
He has publicly apologized for some of his behavior, and for the first time
has said he needs management help. He is interviewing candidates for a chief
operating officer, even as some employees question whether a new addition
will make any difference. He has also been working with senior managers to
reset some of the company’s stated values. Results of an internal
investigation into Uber’s workplace culture are expected next month.
Through an Uber spokesman, Mr. Kalanick declined an interview request. Apple
declined to comment on the meeting with Mr. Cook. Many of the people
interviewed for this article, who revealed previously unreported details of
Mr. Kalanick’s life, asked to remain anonymous because they had signed
nondisclosure agreements with Uber or feared damaging their relationship
with the chief executive.
Mr. Kalanick’s pattern for pushing limits is deeply ingrained. It began
during his childhood in suburban Los Angeles, where he went from being
bullied to being the aggressor, continued through his years taking risks at
two technology start-ups there, and crystallized in his role at Uber.
Selling Efficiency
Mr. Kalanick grew up in the Northridge neighborhood of Los Angeles. His
parents, Bonnie and Donald Kalanick, made sure he and his brother, Cory,
were never left wanting. He was naturally athletic and competitive, and
excelled at running track and playing football.
At Patrick Henry Middle School, he was a wiry student who got good grades —
putting him in the sights of some older kids who picked on him. Mr.
Kalanick later vowed never to be bullied again and turned the tables on his
tormentors.
He also showed signs of entrepreneurialism. One summer, he sold knives door-
to-door for the cutlery company Cutco. At 18, he started New Way Academy,
his own SAT prep business, with a partner.
The start-up life soon called to him. After attending the University of
California, Los Angeles, to major in computer engineering, Mr. Kalanick
dropped out in 1998 to form a start-up with several classmates. The company,
Scour, became a peer-to-peer file exchange similar to Napster, which let
people digitally share music and media files through legally dubious means.
Scour, which was eventually sued for $250 billion for alleged copyright
infringement, filed for bankruptcy in October 2000, a move that protected it
from the suit. The failure did not stop Mr. Kalanick from helping to found
another Los Angeles start-up, Red Swoosh, four months later. Red Swoosh made
a technology to efficiently transfer large files of digital data; one of
its investors was Mr. Cuban.
Sean Stanton, Red Swoosh’s former vice president for sales, said of Mr.
Kalanick: “Scour was about efficiency. Swoosh was about efficiency. It’s
just the way his brain is wired. It’s like the way Uber works right now:
What’s the fastest, cheapest and most efficient way to get from point A to
point B? That consumes him, and all parts of his life.”
With Red Swoosh, Mr. Kalanick started exhibiting his hallmark aggressiveness
. When the company struggled, Mr. Kalanick and a partner took the tax
dollars from employee paychecks — which are supposed to be withheld and
sent to the Internal Revenue Service — and reinvested the money into the
start-up, even as friends and advisers warned him the action was potentially
illegal.
With Mr. Kalanick desperate to keep Red Swoosh afloat, he moved back into
his parents’ house. He staved off bankruptcy for a second time by raising
another round of funding. The wayward tax dollars eventually went to the I.R
.S.
Mr. Kalanick also decamped to Thailand with his software team in April 2006
to save money by living cheaply abroad, while also using the trip as a team-
building exercise.
He was interested not only in business during this time. In 2003 he picked
up a registration form to run for governor of California and registered a
website, travis4gov.com, positioning himself as an independent candidate —
though he never followed through with a campaign. In other personal pursuits
, he once held the world’s second-highest score for the Nintendo Wii Tennis
video game.
In 2007, Mr. Kalanick sold Red Swoosh to Akamai, a cloud services company,
for roughly $19 million. The deal turned the executive, who had headed north
to San Francisco, into a millionaire.
By then, some advisers had soured on him. “The Travis Kalanick I came to
know 17 years ago was relentless in pursuit of his goals at the expense of
those who supported him along the way, deluded by his own embellished
personal narrative, and a serial prevaricator,” said Peter Yorke, a former
Red Swoosh adviser and a longtime tech executive.
Others stuck by him. Michael Robertson, chief executive of MP3.com, an early
digital music sharing service, said that he told Mr. Kalanick, “Sometimes
in business you have to battle the establishment, and it can get brutal and
ugly.”
In San Francisco, Mr. Kalanick and Angie You, his longtime girlfriend,
bought a townhouse nestled in the upper hills of the city’s Castro section.
Though the couple have since split, the two remain close and still speak on
a regular basis.
Uber’s Rise
The idea for Uber came in 2009 from Garrett Camp, a friend of Mr. Kalanick’
s, who became fixated on hailing a private luxury car with a smartphone app
after being unable to catch cabs in San Francisco.
Mr. Camp talked about the idea incessantly, including at Mr. Kalanick’s
townhouse, nicknamed the “Jam Pad.” Entrepreneurs frequently stopped by to
brainstorm there, and the house even had its own Twitter account,
controlled by Mr. Kalanick.
UberCab, as it was called at the time, started its service in San Francisco
in May 2010. Mr. Camp and Mr. Kalanick picked that name to emphasize the
convenience of calling a car on demand from an app. Mr. Kalanick wanted a
break from full-time start-up life after running Red Swoosh, so he and Mr.
Camp named Ryan Graves, who responded to a call for help on Twitter, as
chief executive.
A few months later, Mr. Kalanick changed his mind and took over as UberCab’
s chief. He quickly positioned the start-up as an alternative to the taxi
industry. At the time, taxi companies had iron grips in many towns. City-by-
city regulations required procedures like base stations for cabs, safety
measures and other stipulations.
Mr. Kalanick ignored those rules.
“We’re in a political campaign,” he once said at a technology conference,
and the candidate is Uber. The opponent is named Taxi, he said, adding a
rude descriptive. “Nobody likes him, he’s not a nice character, but he’s
so woven into the political machinery and fabric that a lot of people owe
him favors.”
Mr. Kalanick carried that same level of intensity into Uber’s headquarters,
pacing briskly while working by doing laps around the office. His pacing is
so legendary, his father once said, that he wore a hole in the carpeting.
Mr. Kalanick focused on expanding UberCab quickly. The company typically
sent a small strike team into a new city — say, Seattle — to aggressively
recruit new drivers through Craigslist and other online listings. Then the
team marketed UberCab’s app to increase ridership.
That drew attention from regulators. In October 2010, the company shortened
its name to Uber after receiving a cease-and-desist letter from San
Francisco officials for marketing itself as a taxi company without the
proper licenses and permits.
To influence local legislators to accept Uber, Mr. Kalanick took extra steps
. In 2014, Uber hired Ben Metcalfe, an engineer who described his job on
LinkedIn as building “custom tools to support citizen engagement across
legislative matters” to drive “social good and social change.”
In practice, Mr. Metcalfe and his team created an email-based system to aid
Uber users and drivers to directly contact local legislators to lobby for
allowing Uber in their cities. The system was similar to Change.org, a
website that pushes social change through online petitions. City and state
officials were soon deluged with emails supporting Uber.
In some places, Uber employees were also told to create computer programs
known as scripts that would automatically vote for the ride-hailing service
in city-administered surveys.
Such tactics were effective. In 2015 when New York’s mayor, Bill de Blasio,
tried capping the number of Uber cars, Uber added a “de Blasio” tab in
its app to show lengthy waiting times for rides if legislation against Uber
was allowed to go forward. People could easily send a form email to the
mayor and the City Council supporting Uber by pressing a button in the app.
Mr. de Blasio capitulated, and the cap did not take place.
Taking Center Stage
As Uber gained momentum, Mr. Kalanick moved into the spotlight.
It did not come naturally. One friend recalled a night out with a group of
married couples at the Gold Club, a San Francisco strip club, a few years
ago. Mr. Kalanick, who was single, pulled out a laptop to work on a
spreadsheet, crunching Uber’s numbers while friends watched the dancers
onstage.
Another friend called Mr. Kalanick a “tech world rock star,” which means
something different in Silicon Valley than in the music world.
“To work with and around one requires a different kind of mentality and
skill,” said Andy Abramson, an early adviser to Mr. Kalanick. Mr. Abramson
likened the chief executive to other idiosyncratic founders like Jeff Bezos
of Amazon.
Mr. Kalanick was eventually coaxed more into the limelight by others.
Shervin Pishevar, an Uber investor, sometimes took Mr. Kalanick to clubs in
Los Angeles on the weekend, providing a car and a change of “club clothes.
” Mr. Pishevar, who did not respond to a request for comment, was the Uber
chief’s entryway into Los Angeles’s world of celebrity.
Hollywood stars were eager to buy into Uber, which they had started using to
get around. Actors like Edward Norton, Olivia Munn and Sophia Bush took
small stakes in the company. Mr. Kalanick and a top lieutenant, Emil Michael
, sometimes hung out with Leonardo DiCaprio, who is also an investor, and
Jay Z, whose wife, Beyoncé, performed for Uber employees at a poolside
party in Las Vegas in 2015.
Jay Z once wired money to Mr. Michael in an attempt to invest even more in
Uber. Mr. Michael and Mr. Kalanick, giddy at rebuffing a celebrity, wired
some of the money back, saying they already had too many interested
investors. Representatives for Jay Z did not respond to requests for comment.
Mr. Kalanick also dreamed of luring celebrities into advisory roles at Uber.
One aim was persuading Oprah Winfrey to join the board — something Uber
executives believed could happen after Mr. Kalanick met Ms. Winfrey at a
party on the Spanish island of Ibiza — but the idea never jelled. A
spokeswoman for Ms. Winfrey declined to comment.
Mr. Kalanick began mixing with elite business executives. He developed a
close relationship with Mr. Cohn, then a top-ranking executive at Goldman
Sachs. At one point, the two men spoke on a near daily basis. Mr. Cohn and a
White House spokeswoman did not return requests for comment.
Leadership Principles
Inside Uber, Mr. Kalanick began codifying the pillars of the company’s
culture. He particularly admired Amazon, the e-commerce company that
espouses 14 leadership principles including “learn and be curious” and “
insist on the highest standards.” So he created 14 values for Uber, with
tenets such as being “super pumped” and “always be hustlin’.”
Some employees admired Mr. Kalanick’s deep involvement in Uber. “TK was
hands-on and in the product weeds,” said Chris Messina, who left Uber in
January, using Mr. Kalanick’s nickname. “He cared deeply about the product
and the people building it.”
Mr. Kalanick’s main mantra was “growth above all else.”
That meant Uber’s top performers were often promoted and protected. When
one general manager, a title for a city-level chief, threw a coffee mug at a
subordinate in a fit of rage, the incident was reported to human resources
— but there was no follow-up. At the time, Uber’s business in the general
manager’s city was strong.
Other complaints also fell on deaf ears.
After a backlash over Uber’s use of “surge pricing” (raising ride prices
when demand is high) amid an East Coast snowstorm in 2013, Mr. Kalanick’s
response to upset riders was a torrent of economics and math.
“We did more trips because of our approach, not fewer,” he said in an
interview with Wired at the time. “We gave people more options to get
around, and that is the whole frickin’ goal.”
Friends and employees told Mr. Kalanick that he should at least pretend to
care about how it looked to take such a hostile stance with Uber’s users.
Several described him as “emotionally unintelligent.”
Mr. Kalanick made other missteps. In 2014, he and his then-girlfriend, Gabi
Holzwarth, went out in South Korea with Mr. Michael and other Uber employees
to drink and sing karaoke. The establishment was an escort bar, where
customers may pay for the company of women, and some members of the party
picked out dates for the evening. The incident, reported by The Information,
resulted in a human resources complaint from an employee who attended.
The same year, Mr. Kalanick discussed how Uber had boosted his desirability
with women in an interview with GQ, calling the company “boob-er.”
And just days after a former employee published a blog post in February
detailing sexual harassment at Uber, Mr. Kalanick attended Vanity Fair’s
Academy Awards party in Hollywood, stunning some colleagues with his
perceived insensitivity.
His desire for growth also knew few limits. Uber plunged into China in 2013,
and Mr. Kalanick spent billions of dollars to outgun the local incumbent
Didi Chuxing — only to have to retreat last year, partly because of heavy
losses. Mr. Kalanick is now spending heavily in India to win there, even
offering to become an Indian citizen if it will help Uber’s prospects. The
company has said that it lost $2.8 billion in 2016, excluding China.
For the Win
With Mr. Kalanick setting the tone at Uber, employees acted to ensure the
ride-hailing service would win no matter what.
They spent much of their energy one-upping rivals like Lyft. Uber devoted
teams to so-called competitive intelligence, purchasing data from an
analytics service called Slice Intelligence. Using an email digest service
it owns named Unroll.me, Slice collected its customers’ emailed Lyft
receipts from their inboxes and sold the anonymized data to Uber. Uber used
the data as a proxy for the health of Lyft’s business. (Lyft, too, operates
a competitive intelligence team.)
Slice confirmed that it sells anonymized data (meaning that customers’
names are not attached) based on ride receipts from Uber and Lyft, but
declined to disclose who buys the information.
Uber also tried to win over Lyft’s drivers. Uber’s “driver satisfaction
rating,” an internal metric, has dropped since February 2016, and roughly a
quarter of its drivers turn over on average every three months. According
to an internal slide deck on driver income levels viewed by The New York
Times, Uber considered Lyft and McDonald’s its main competition for
attracting new drivers.
To frustrate Lyft drivers, Uber dispatched some employees to order and
cancel Lyft rides en masse. Others hailed Lyfts and spent the rides
persuading drivers to switch to Uber full time.
After Mr. Kalanick heard that Lyft was working on a car-pooling feature,
Uber created and started its own car-pooling option, UberPool, in 2014, two
days before Lyft unveiled its project.
That year, Uber came close to buying Lyft. At a meeting at Mr. Kalanick’s
house, and over cartons of Chinese food, he and Mr. Michael hosted Lyft’s
president, John Zimmer, who asked for 15 percent of Uber in exchange for
selling Lyft. Over the next hour, Mr. Kalanick and Mr. Michael repeatedly
laughed at Mr. Zimmer’s audacious request. No deal was reached. Lyft
declined to comment.
The rivalry remains in force. In 2016, Uber held a summit meeting in Mexico
City for some top managers, where it distributed a playbook on how to cut
into Lyft’s business and had sessions on how to damage its competitor.
To develop its own business, Uber sidestepped the authorities. Some
employees started using a tool called Greyball to deceive officials trying
to shut down Uber’s service. The tool, developed to aid driver safety and
to trick fraudsters, essentially showed a fake version of Uber’s app to
some people to disguise the locations of cars and drivers. It soon became a
way for Uber drivers to evade capture by law enforcement in places where the
service was deemed illegal.
After The Times reported on Greyball in March, Uber said it would prohibit
employees from using the tool against law enforcement.
The idea of fooling Apple, the main distributor of Uber’s app, began in
2014.
At the time, Uber was dealing with widespread account fraud in places like
China, where tricksters bought stolen iPhones that were erased and resold.
Some Uber drivers there would then create dozens of fake email addresses to
sign up for new Uber rider accounts attached to each phone, and request
rides from those phones, which they would then accept. Since Uber was
handing out incentives to drivers to take more rides, the drivers could earn
more money this way.
To halt the activity, Uber engineers assigned a persistent identity to
iPhones with a small piece of code, a practice called “fingerprinting.”
Uber could then identify an iPhone and prevent itself from being fooled even
after the device was erased of its contents.
There was one problem: Fingerprinting iPhones broke Apple’s rules. Mr. Cook
believed that wiping an iPhone should ensure that no trace of the owner’s
identity remained on the device.
So Mr. Kalanick told his engineers to “geofence” Apple’s headquarters in
Cupertino, Calif., a way to digitally identify people reviewing Uber’s
software in a specific location. Uber would then obfuscate its code for
people within that geofenced area, essentially drawing a digital lasso
around those it wanted to keep in the dark. Apple employees at its
headquarters were unable to see Uber’s fingerprinting.
The ruse did not last. Apple engineers outside of Cupertino caught on to
Uber’s methods, prompting Mr. Cook to call Mr. Kalanick to his office.
Mr. Kalanick was shaken by Mr. Cook’s scolding, according to a person who
saw him after the meeting.
But only momentarily. After all, Mr. Kalanick had faced off against Apple,
and Uber had survived. He had lived to fight another day.
Doris Burke contributed research.
Follow Mike Isaac on Twitter @MikeIsaac.
A version of this article appears in print on April 24, 2017, on Page A1 of
the New York edition with the headline: Uber Tallies the Costs of Its Leader
’s Drive to Win at Any Price. Order Reprints| Today's Paper|Subscribe
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
这下Ubert被西雅图搞傻比了
公开贿赂选民是犯罪吧
川普的蜜月期已经结束
#DeleteUber和#BoycottStarbucks,看Trump是个灾星
Google在旧金山推出拼车服务,但是司机、乘客一天只能用两次
IT业又一次站到了美国人民和国家安全的对立面
Lyft发布第一份员工多样性报告
uber将被多元化玩死
3/4纽约女性曾在公共交通遭性骚扰,有目击者吗
视频:特朗普跟13位硅谷大佬开了场尴尬的和解大会
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: mr话题: uber话题: kalanick话题: he话题: his