k**n
发帖数: 3989 | 1 某成员在微信群贴的.
回信。http://kuow.org/post/trump-win-could-help-china-s-why-banner-flew-over-seattle
Dear Amy,
I'm one of the PR contact for CAFT (Chinese American for Trump)
I read your article today and was shocked by how you derive to your
conclusion.
In your article (see link), you interviewed a student from China who is a
Chinese citizen. To his opinion, if Trump is elected, it is good for China.
You then concluded that we Chinese Americans who are American citizens vote
for Trump was really it's for China's interest.
I really don't understand logic here. Are you saying: how "Chinese citizen"
think = how "Chinese American (USA citizen) think?
I can tell you that for me and many of my friends who are Chinese American,
why we support Trump is because we are American! We love Our country America!
We want to Make America Great Again! It has nothing to do with China.
All I see is the same old stuff " Asian are always alien. " This is clearly
a racism.
I don't know your origin, are your ancestor from Russia? Germany? Italy? Can
I conclude Russian's interest based on your opinion alone? Wait, in this
logic, at least your should interview someone like me who is an American
citizen.
I demand an apology and an correction. And an follow up interview with me. I
will tell you why we support Trump.
Thanks,
Best Regards,
Xxxx XX
Mobile: |
r**********f
发帖数: 2808 | 2 很好的回信。 NPR曲解事实，以服务希拉里为最终目的，真地很恶心。 |
h***n
发帖数: 1600 | 3 信的口气太软了,必须要求fire掉写文章的那位。 |
E********y
发帖数: 293 | 4 说真的，这个信写的很差，好多文法错误。
不说别的，第一人称应该用we, 而不是I。既然代表组织，那就不是以个人的身份写信。 |
m**k
发帖数: 1503 | 5 自己知道写的不好，所以没用组织的名义写，而是用个人的名义，这点事对的
信。
【在 E********y 的大作中提到】
: 说真的，这个信写的很差，好多文法错误。
: 不说别的，第一人称应该用we, 而不是I。既然代表组织，那就不是以个人的身份写信。
|
q***a
发帖数: 3877 | 6 不仅应写给文章作者Amy，而且应该写给NPR的编辑部，表达抗议！ |
l*w
发帖数: 3758 | 7 找个ABC改改文字吧。这个一看就不是native speaker写出来的。找个ABC改写一下，起
码也能更表明你是American啊
某成员在微信群贴的.
.
vote
【在 k**n 的大作中提到】
: 某成员在微信群贴的.
: 回信。http://kuow.org/post/trump-win-could-help-china-s-why-banner-flew-over-seattle
: Dear Amy,
: I'm one of the PR contact for CAFT (Chinese American for Trump)
: I read your article today and was shocked by how you derive to your
: conclusion.
: In your article (see link), you interviewed a student from China who is a
: Chinese citizen. To his opinion, if Trump is elected, it is good for China.
: You then concluded that we Chinese Americans who are American citizens vote
: for Trump was really it's for China's interest.
|
E********y
发帖数: 293 | 8 既然要求再interview，就不是代表个人了把？
anyway，这写的完全不像是在美国接受过高等教育的。太口语化，太多个人情感，用了
太多的定语，使得行文客观性大大折扣。
【在 m**k 的大作中提到】
: 自己知道写的不好，所以没用组织的名义写，而是用个人的名义，这点事对的
:
: 信。
|
h***n
发帖数: 1600 | 9 写不好，就花钱找好一点律师写, 另外一定得找律师咨询一下，这么重要的事怎么不当
一回事？这种信要么不要出, 要出就切中要害。花了那么多金钱和精力, 不希望最后是
个负面结果吧？ |
E********y
发帖数: 293 | 10 没错。空有政治热情，没有政治智慧，好心也会办坏事
【在 h***n 的大作中提到】
: 写不好，就花钱找好一点律师写, 另外一定得找律师咨询一下，这么重要的事怎么不当
: 一回事？这种信要么不要出, 要出就切中要害。花了那么多金钱和精力, 不希望最后是
: 个负面结果吧？
|
|
|
o**y
发帖数: 1466 | 11 文字本身没有那么重要，有语法错误也没有关系，重要的表达自己的观点，把观点正确
地表达出去，这是第一位的，其他的不必纠结
我们群策群力，把观点提出来，同时也把文字润色好
【在 l*w 的大作中提到】
: 找个ABC改改文字吧。这个一看就不是native speaker写出来的。找个ABC改写一下，起
: 码也能更表明你是American啊
:
: 某成员在微信群贴的.
: .
: vote
|
w****h
发帖数: 1344 | 12 Abosolutely. Besides, the formal letter should be sent by the lawye of CAFT
or review by a lawyer. Basically, NPR has to make formal apology/
correction on their radio program(which is not rare). If CAFT do not have
the money for hiring a lawyer, tens of thousands people will donate for the
fund for justice, I personally could donate $300.
: 不仅应写给文章作者Amy，而且应该写给NPR的编辑部，表达抗议！
【在 q***a 的大作中提到】
: 不仅应写给文章作者Amy，而且应该写给NPR的编辑部，表达抗议！
|
E*****5
发帖数: 1068 | 13 谢谢CAFT义工的及时跟进。不过，作为一组织的公开发言，措辞和格式如果更正式一点
就更好。建议群里有关法律人士一起介入商谈。 |
g****y
发帖数: 2810 | 14 还跟中国切割呢，你家白人主子看了都能笑出声
某成员在微信群贴的.
.
vote
【在 k**n 的大作中提到】
: 某成员在微信群贴的.
: 回信。http://kuow.org/post/trump-win-could-help-china-s-why-banner-flew-over-seattle
: Dear Amy,
: I'm one of the PR contact for CAFT (Chinese American for Trump)
: I read your article today and was shocked by how you derive to your
: conclusion.
: In your article (see link), you interviewed a student from China who is a
: Chinese citizen. To his opinion, if Trump is elected, it is good for China.
: You then concluded that we Chinese Americans who are American citizens vote
: for Trump was really it's for China's interest.
|
P********y
发帖数: 4195 | |
E********y
发帖数: 293 | 16 表达个人观点可以，但是然并卵。人家直接忽略掉。
这种文件书信，哪怕是不具有法律效应的，也要正式规范，这样才能让对方感到有实质
性的威胁。
【在 o**y 的大作中提到】
: 文字本身没有那么重要，有语法错误也没有关系，重要的表达自己的观点，把观点正确
: 地表达出去，这是第一位的，其他的不必纠结
: 我们群策群力，把观点提出来，同时也把文字润色好
|
M*****l
发帖数: 4478 | 17 问题是观点和逻辑。。。也弱了点
【在 o**y 的大作中提到】
: 文字本身没有那么重要，有语法错误也没有关系，重要的表达自己的观点，把观点正确
: 地表达出去，这是第一位的，其他的不必纠结
: 我们群策群力，把观点提出来，同时也把文字润色好
|
M****x
发帖数: 12 | 18 Please get a lawyer to draft the letter. Just a few hundred bucks. It will
make big difference.
某成员在微信群贴的.
.
vote
【在 k**n 的大作中提到】
: 某成员在微信群贴的.
: 回信。http://kuow.org/post/trump-win-could-help-china-s-why-banner-flew-over-seattle
: Dear Amy,
: I'm one of the PR contact for CAFT (Chinese American for Trump)
: I read your article today and was shocked by how you derive to your
: conclusion.
: In your article (see link), you interviewed a student from China who is a
: Chinese citizen. To his opinion, if Trump is elected, it is good for China.
: You then concluded that we Chinese Americans who are American citizens vote
: for Trump was really it's for China's interest.
|
